Consumer Understanding of Prescription Drug Indications in Direct-to-Consumer Television Advertisements.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Helen W Sullivan, Kathryn J Aikin, Mihaela Johnson, Kate Ferriola-Bruckenstein
{"title":"Consumer Understanding of Prescription Drug Indications in Direct-to-Consumer Television Advertisements.","authors":"Helen W Sullivan, Kathryn J Aikin, Mihaela Johnson, Kate Ferriola-Bruckenstein","doi":"10.1007/s43441-024-00732-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prescription drugs may be indicated to treat more than one medical condition, and companies may promote more than one indication in the same direct-to-consumer (DTC) ad. This study examined how presenting multiple prescription drug indications in one DTC television ad affects consumers' processing of drug information.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted two studies with adults diagnosed with diabetes (Study 1, N = 408) or rheumatoid arthritis (Study 2, N = 411). We randomly assigned participants to view one of three television ads: primary indication only (Study 1: diabetic peripheral neuropathy; Study 2: rheumatoid arthritis), primary plus a similar secondary indication (Study 1: fibromyalgia; Study 2: psoriatic arthritis), or primary plus a dissimilar secondary indication (Study 1: generalized anxiety disorder; Study 2: ulcerative colitis).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Remembering and understanding the primary indication was not significantly affected by the presence of a secondary indication (similar or dissimilar). Higher health literacy participants remembered and understood secondary indications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Including a second indication in DTC television ads does not appear to have detrimental effects and can increase awareness of the second indication for some participants. Industry and regulators should continue to ensure DTC promotion is truthful and non-misleading, irrespective of the number of indications presented.</p>","PeriodicalId":23084,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-024-00732-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prescription drugs may be indicated to treat more than one medical condition, and companies may promote more than one indication in the same direct-to-consumer (DTC) ad. This study examined how presenting multiple prescription drug indications in one DTC television ad affects consumers' processing of drug information.

Methods: We conducted two studies with adults diagnosed with diabetes (Study 1, N = 408) or rheumatoid arthritis (Study 2, N = 411). We randomly assigned participants to view one of three television ads: primary indication only (Study 1: diabetic peripheral neuropathy; Study 2: rheumatoid arthritis), primary plus a similar secondary indication (Study 1: fibromyalgia; Study 2: psoriatic arthritis), or primary plus a dissimilar secondary indication (Study 1: generalized anxiety disorder; Study 2: ulcerative colitis).

Results: Remembering and understanding the primary indication was not significantly affected by the presence of a secondary indication (similar or dissimilar). Higher health literacy participants remembered and understood secondary indications.

Conclusions: Including a second indication in DTC television ads does not appear to have detrimental effects and can increase awareness of the second indication for some participants. Industry and regulators should continue to ensure DTC promotion is truthful and non-misleading, irrespective of the number of indications presented.

背景:处方药可能适用于治疗一种以上的病症,公司可能会在同一则直接面向消费者(DTC)的广告中宣传一种以上的适应症。本研究探讨了在一则 DTC 电视广告中介绍多种处方药适应症如何影响消费者对药物信息的处理:我们对确诊患有糖尿病(研究 1,408 人)或类风湿性关节炎(研究 2,411 人)的成年人进行了两项研究。我们随机分配参与者观看三种电视广告中的一种:仅主要适应症(研究 1:糖尿病周围神经病变;研究 2:类风湿性关节炎)、主要适应症加类似的次要适应症(研究 1:纤维肌痛;研究 2:银屑病关节炎)或主要适应症加不同的次要适应症(研究 1:广泛性焦虑症;研究 2:溃疡性结肠炎):结果:主要适应症的记忆和理解并没有受到次要适应症(相似或不相似)的显著影响。健康素养较高的参与者能够记住并理解第二适应症:结论:在 DTC 电视广告中加入第二适应症似乎不会产生不利影响,而且可以提高一些参与者对第二适应症的认识。行业和监管机构应继续确保 DTC 宣传真实且不具误导性,无论广告中出现多少适应症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science MEDICAL INFORMATICS-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science (TIRS) is the official scientific journal of DIA that strives to advance medical product discovery, development, regulation, and use through the publication of peer-reviewed original and review articles, commentaries, and letters to the editor across the spectrum of converting biomedical science into practical solutions to advance human health. The focus areas of the journal are as follows: Biostatistics Clinical Trials Product Development and Innovation Global Perspectives Policy Regulatory Science Product Safety Special Populations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信