Patterns of Extraocular Muscle Enlargement in Graves' Orbitopathy and Acromegaly.

IF 5.8 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Thyroid Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1089/thy.2024.0438
Chris Zajner, Nikhil Patil, Rachel McInnis, Stan Van Uum, Alexander Fraser, Pavlo Ohorodnyk, Lulu L C D Bursztyn
{"title":"Patterns of Extraocular Muscle Enlargement in Graves' Orbitopathy and Acromegaly.","authors":"Chris Zajner, Nikhil Patil, Rachel McInnis, Stan Van Uum, Alexander Fraser, Pavlo Ohorodnyk, Lulu L C D Bursztyn","doi":"10.1089/thy.2024.0438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> Extraocular muscle (EOM) enlargement occurs in both acromegaly and Graves' disease, but the degree and pattern of enlargement have not been directly compared in these patient groups. This study investigated whether acromegaly and Graves' orbitopathy (GO) are associated with different patterns of EOM enlargement at the time of diagnosis. <b><i>Study Design:</i></b> Retrospective cohort. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> All new patients with a diagnosis of acromegaly or GO who presented to St Joseph's Health Care in London, Ontario, between January 1, 2015, and July 1, 2020, and who underwent computed tomography (CT) scanning with adequate orbital imaging were considered for inclusion. We included age- and sex-matched control patients with pituitary macroadenomas without thyroid or growth hormone abnormalities. Orbital CT scans were analyzed by a single neuroradiologist, who measured the maximum diameter and cross-sectional area of each EOM. The relative likelihood of involvement of each rectus EOM was analyzed separately using an analysis of variance test. <b><i>Results:</i></b> We included 16 patients with GO, 17 with acromegaly, and 18 controls. Ages (mean ± standard deviation) of groups were 55.6 ± 18.0, 50.2 ± 15.7, and 49.3 ± 14.0 years. The mean maximum diameter of EOMs in GO, acromegaly, and controls was inferior rectus (IR) = 4.77 ± 1.53, 4.66 ± 0.61, and 3.68 ± 0.61 mm; medial rectus (MR) = 5.35 ± 2.23, 4.84 ± 0.81, and 3.65 ± 0.42 mm; superior rectus (SR) = 4.94 ± 1.84, 4.88 ± 0.91, and 3.68 ± 0.61 mm; and lateral rectus (LR) = 3.91 ± 1.59, 4.55 ± 0.60, and 3.20 ± 0.43 mm. The IR, MR, and SR muscles were significantly larger in the GO group compared with controls (IR, <i>p</i> = 0.020; SR, <i>p</i> = 0.004; MR, <i>p</i> < 0.001; and LR, <i>p</i> = 0.166), and all four EOMs were larger in acromegaly compared with controls (IR, <i>p</i> = 0.039; SR, <i>p</i> = 0.006; MR, <i>p</i> = 0.006; and LR, <i>p</i> = 0.001). There was no significant difference between the GO and acromegaly groups (IR, <i>p</i> = 0.959; SR, <i>p</i> = 0.987; MR, <i>p</i> = 0.408; and LR, <i>p</i> = 0.250). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> GO and acromegaly groups demonstrated the enlargement of the IR, MR, and SR muscles when compared with controls. The GO group did not show significantly larger EOM sizes compared with the acromegaly group. In the GO group, the IR, MR, and SR were similarly affected and did not follow previously described patterns of enlargement in GO.</p>","PeriodicalId":23016,"journal":{"name":"Thyroid","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thyroid","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2024.0438","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Extraocular muscle (EOM) enlargement occurs in both acromegaly and Graves' disease, but the degree and pattern of enlargement have not been directly compared in these patient groups. This study investigated whether acromegaly and Graves' orbitopathy (GO) are associated with different patterns of EOM enlargement at the time of diagnosis. Study Design: Retrospective cohort. Methods: All new patients with a diagnosis of acromegaly or GO who presented to St Joseph's Health Care in London, Ontario, between January 1, 2015, and July 1, 2020, and who underwent computed tomography (CT) scanning with adequate orbital imaging were considered for inclusion. We included age- and sex-matched control patients with pituitary macroadenomas without thyroid or growth hormone abnormalities. Orbital CT scans were analyzed by a single neuroradiologist, who measured the maximum diameter and cross-sectional area of each EOM. The relative likelihood of involvement of each rectus EOM was analyzed separately using an analysis of variance test. Results: We included 16 patients with GO, 17 with acromegaly, and 18 controls. Ages (mean ± standard deviation) of groups were 55.6 ± 18.0, 50.2 ± 15.7, and 49.3 ± 14.0 years. The mean maximum diameter of EOMs in GO, acromegaly, and controls was inferior rectus (IR) = 4.77 ± 1.53, 4.66 ± 0.61, and 3.68 ± 0.61 mm; medial rectus (MR) = 5.35 ± 2.23, 4.84 ± 0.81, and 3.65 ± 0.42 mm; superior rectus (SR) = 4.94 ± 1.84, 4.88 ± 0.91, and 3.68 ± 0.61 mm; and lateral rectus (LR) = 3.91 ± 1.59, 4.55 ± 0.60, and 3.20 ± 0.43 mm. The IR, MR, and SR muscles were significantly larger in the GO group compared with controls (IR, p = 0.020; SR, p = 0.004; MR, p < 0.001; and LR, p = 0.166), and all four EOMs were larger in acromegaly compared with controls (IR, p = 0.039; SR, p = 0.006; MR, p = 0.006; and LR, p = 0.001). There was no significant difference between the GO and acromegaly groups (IR, p = 0.959; SR, p = 0.987; MR, p = 0.408; and LR, p = 0.250). Conclusions: GO and acromegaly groups demonstrated the enlargement of the IR, MR, and SR muscles when compared with controls. The GO group did not show significantly larger EOM sizes compared with the acromegaly group. In the GO group, the IR, MR, and SR were similarly affected and did not follow previously described patterns of enlargement in GO.

Graves眼病和肢端肥大症的眼外肌扩张模式。
目的:眼外肌(EOM)肿大发生于肢端肥大症和Graves病,但其程度和模式在这两组患者中没有直接比较。本研究探讨了肢端肥大症和Graves眼病(GO)在诊断时是否与不同类型的EOM增大有关。研究设计:回顾性队列。方法:纳入2015年1月1日至2020年7月1日期间在安大略省伦敦St Joseph's Health Care就诊的所有新诊断为肢端肥大症或GO的患者,并进行了计算机断层扫描(CT),并进行了足够的眼眶成像。我们纳入了年龄和性别匹配的无甲状腺或生长激素异常的垂体大腺瘤患者作为对照。眼眶CT扫描由一名神经放射学家分析,他测量了每个眼窝的最大直径和横截面积。采用方差分析检验,分别分析各直肌EOM受累的相对可能性。结果:我们纳入了16例GO患者,17例肢端肥大症患者和18例对照组。各组年龄(平均±标准差)分别为55.6±18.0岁、50.2±15.7岁和49.3±14.0岁。GO、肢端肥大症和对照组的EOMs平均最大直径为下直肌(IR) = 4.77±1.53、4.66±0.61和3.68±0.61 mm;内侧直肌(MR) = 5.35±2.23、4.84±0.81、3.65±0.42 mm;上直肌(SR) = 4.94±1.84、4.88±0.91、3.68±0.61 mm;侧直肌(LR) = 3.91±1.59、4.55±0.60、3.20±0.43 mm。氧化石墨烯组IR、MR和SR肌肉明显大于对照组(IR, p = 0.020;SR, p = 0.004;MR, p < 0.001;和LR, p = 0.166),肢端肥大症患者的4个eom均大于对照组(IR, p = 0.039;SR, p = 0.006;MR, p = 0.006;LR, p = 0.001)。GO组与肢端肥大症组间差异无统计学意义(IR, p = 0.959;SR, p = 0.987;MR, p = 0.408;LR, p = 0.250)。结论:与对照组相比,GO和肢端肥大症组表现出IR、MR和SR肌肉的扩大。与肢端肥大症组相比,氧化石墨烯组的EOM大小没有明显增加。在氧化石墨烯组中,IR、MR和SR同样受到影响,并且没有遵循先前描述的氧化石墨烯增大模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thyroid
Thyroid 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
195
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: This authoritative journal program, including the monthly flagship journal Thyroid, Clinical Thyroidology® (monthly), and VideoEndocrinology™ (quarterly), delivers in-depth coverage on topics from clinical application and primary care, to the latest advances in diagnostic imaging and surgical techniques and technologies, designed to optimize patient care and outcomes. Thyroid is the leading, peer-reviewed resource for original articles, patient-focused reports, and translational research on thyroid cancer and all thyroid related diseases. The Journal delivers the latest findings on topics from primary care to clinical application, and is the exclusive source for the authoritative and updated American Thyroid Association (ATA) Guidelines for Managing Thyroid Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信