Prescribing deprescribing for polypharmacy in Aotearoa New Zealand; experiences of a medication review activity in final year medical students on a general practice module.

IF 1.1 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Samantha A Murton, Lynn McBain, Caroline Morris, Estelle Jaine, Lesley Gray
{"title":"Prescribing deprescribing for polypharmacy in Aotearoa New Zealand; experiences of a medication review activity in final year medical students on a general practice module.","authors":"Samantha A Murton, Lynn McBain, Caroline Morris, Estelle Jaine, Lesley Gray","doi":"10.1071/HC23169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction This study explored the experiences of students and their supervisors undertaking a medication review activity during a 6-week general practice module in their final year of medical school at University of Otago, Wellington, Aotearoa New Zealand. Aim The study sought the self-reported value of the activity in learning about prescribing, reflecting on polypharmacy, deprescribing, and changes to future practice for both student and supervisor. Methods All students in the final year general practice module were invited to complete a survey over a 12-month period, as were their supervisors. An abductive thematic analysis of survey results was performed. Results Fifty-eight percent (48/87) of students and 30% (10/33) of supervisors completed surveys. Five themes were identified in the analysis of qualitative data: value of the medication review, complexities of medicines, importance of monitoring, value of resources, and supervisor reflections on value to the student. Student and supervisor responses reflected on prescribing practice beyond what medication to give when. All responses described benefit to patients and the majority expressed thoughts on how it would change their future prescribing. Discussion The medication review activity in the final year general practice module provides learning opportunities for both student and general practitioner supervisor. This activity emphasises the risks of polypharmacy and how to deprescribe. This study underlines the value of medication reviews as intraprofessional communication activities, allowing reflection beyond what medication to prescribe and for what condition. The results underline the importance of reflecting on practice and aids quality improvement benefit to patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":"16 4","pages":"357-363"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of primary health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/HC23169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction This study explored the experiences of students and their supervisors undertaking a medication review activity during a 6-week general practice module in their final year of medical school at University of Otago, Wellington, Aotearoa New Zealand. Aim The study sought the self-reported value of the activity in learning about prescribing, reflecting on polypharmacy, deprescribing, and changes to future practice for both student and supervisor. Methods All students in the final year general practice module were invited to complete a survey over a 12-month period, as were their supervisors. An abductive thematic analysis of survey results was performed. Results Fifty-eight percent (48/87) of students and 30% (10/33) of supervisors completed surveys. Five themes were identified in the analysis of qualitative data: value of the medication review, complexities of medicines, importance of monitoring, value of resources, and supervisor reflections on value to the student. Student and supervisor responses reflected on prescribing practice beyond what medication to give when. All responses described benefit to patients and the majority expressed thoughts on how it would change their future prescribing. Discussion The medication review activity in the final year general practice module provides learning opportunities for both student and general practitioner supervisor. This activity emphasises the risks of polypharmacy and how to deprescribe. This study underlines the value of medication reviews as intraprofessional communication activities, allowing reflection beyond what medication to prescribe and for what condition. The results underline the importance of reflecting on practice and aids quality improvement benefit to patients.

新西兰奥特罗阿综合药房的处方解方医学生最后一年全科实践单元的药物回顾活动的经验。
本研究探讨了在新西兰奥塔哥大学医学院最后一年为期6周的全科实践模块中进行药物审查活动的学生及其导师的经验。目的本研究旨在探讨学生和导师在学习处方、反思多药、开处方以及对未来实践的改变等方面的自我报告价值。方法邀请全科实践模块最后一年的所有学生和他们的导师一起完成为期12个月的调查。对调查结果进行了诱导性专题分析。结果58%(48/87)的学生和30%(10/33)的导师完成了问卷调查。在定性数据分析中确定了五个主题:药物审查的价值、药物的复杂性、监测的重要性、资源的价值和主管对学生价值的反思。学生和导师的反应反映了处方实践,而不是什么时候给什么药。所有的回答都描述了对患者的好处,大多数人表达了对它将如何改变他们未来处方的想法。最后一年全科医学模块的药物复习活动为学生和全科医生导师提供了学习机会。这一活动强调了多种药物的风险以及如何解除处方。这项研究强调了药物审查作为专业内部交流活动的价值,允许反思开什么药和针对什么情况。结果强调了反思实践的重要性,有助于提高质量,使患者受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of primary health care
Journal of primary health care PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
79
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信