Mixed-methods multicenter assessment of healthcare workers' knowledge, perceptions, and practices related to blood culture utilization in hospitalized adults.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Valeria Fabre, Sara E Cosgrove, Aaron M Milstone, Alejandra B Salinas, Kathleen O Degnan, Erin B Gettler, Laurel J Glaser, J Kristie Johnson, Rebekah W Moehring, George E Nelson, Barry Rittmann, Guillermo Rodriguez-Nava, Jonathan H Ryder, Jorge L Salinas, Gregory M Schrank, Thomas T Talbot, Trevor C Van Schooneveld, Anastasia Wasylyshyn, Anping Xie
{"title":"Mixed-methods multicenter assessment of healthcare workers' knowledge, perceptions, and practices related to blood culture utilization in hospitalized adults.","authors":"Valeria Fabre, Sara E Cosgrove, Aaron M Milstone, Alejandra B Salinas, Kathleen O Degnan, Erin B Gettler, Laurel J Glaser, J Kristie Johnson, Rebekah W Moehring, George E Nelson, Barry Rittmann, Guillermo Rodriguez-Nava, Jonathan H Ryder, Jorge L Salinas, Gregory M Schrank, Thomas T Talbot, Trevor C Van Schooneveld, Anastasia Wasylyshyn, Anping Xie","doi":"10.1017/ice.2024.208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand healthcare workers' (HCWs) beliefs and practices toward blood culture (BCx) use.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional electronic survey and semi-structured interviews.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic hospitals in the United States.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>HCWs involved in BCx ordering and collection in adult intensive care units (ICU) and wards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We administered an anonymous electronic survey to HCWs and conducted semi-structured interviews with unit staff and quality improvement (QI) leaders in these institutions to understand their perspectives regarding BCx stewardship between February and November 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 314 HCWs who responded to the survey, most (67.4%) were physicians and were involved in BCx ordering (82.3%). Most survey respondents reported that clinicians had a low threshold to culture patients for fever (84.4%) and agreed they could safely reduce the number of BCx obtained in their units (65%). However, only half of them believed BCx was overused. Although most made BCx decisions as a team (74.1%), a minority reported these team discussions occurred daily (42.4%). A third of respondents reported not usually collecting the correct volume per BCx bottle, half were unaware of the improved sensitivity of 2 BCx sets, and most were unsure of the nationally recommended BCx contamination threshold (87.5%). Knowledge regarding the utility of BCx for common infections was limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HCWs' understanding of best collection practices and yield of BCx was limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2024.208","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To understand healthcare workers' (HCWs) beliefs and practices toward blood culture (BCx) use.

Design: Cross-sectional electronic survey and semi-structured interviews.

Setting: Academic hospitals in the United States.

Participants: HCWs involved in BCx ordering and collection in adult intensive care units (ICU) and wards.

Methods: We administered an anonymous electronic survey to HCWs and conducted semi-structured interviews with unit staff and quality improvement (QI) leaders in these institutions to understand their perspectives regarding BCx stewardship between February and November 2023.

Results: Of 314 HCWs who responded to the survey, most (67.4%) were physicians and were involved in BCx ordering (82.3%). Most survey respondents reported that clinicians had a low threshold to culture patients for fever (84.4%) and agreed they could safely reduce the number of BCx obtained in their units (65%). However, only half of them believed BCx was overused. Although most made BCx decisions as a team (74.1%), a minority reported these team discussions occurred daily (42.4%). A third of respondents reported not usually collecting the correct volume per BCx bottle, half were unaware of the improved sensitivity of 2 BCx sets, and most were unsure of the nationally recommended BCx contamination threshold (87.5%). Knowledge regarding the utility of BCx for common infections was limited.

Conclusions: HCWs' understanding of best collection practices and yield of BCx was limited.

对住院成人血培养利用相关医护人员的知识、认知和实践的混合方法多中心评估
目的:了解卫生保健工作者(HCWs)对血培养(BCx)使用的信念和做法。设计:横断面电子调查和半结构化访谈。环境:美国的学术医院。参与者:参与成人重症监护病房(ICU)和病房BCx订购和收集的医护人员。方法:我们对卫生保健工作者进行了匿名电子调查,并对这些机构的单位工作人员和质量改进(QI)负责人进行了半结构化访谈,以了解他们在2023年2月至11月期间对BCx管理的看法。结果:参与调查的314名卫生保健员中,医生占67.4%,参与BCx点单的占82.3%。大多数调查应答者报告说,临床医生对患者进行发热培养的门槛较低(84.4%),并同意他们可以安全地减少在其单位获得的BCx数量(65%)。然而,只有一半的人认为BCx被过度使用了。尽管大多数人是作为一个团队做出BCx决策(74.1%),但少数人报告说这些团队讨论每天都会发生(42.4%)。三分之一的受访者报告说,通常不收集每瓶BCx的正确体积,一半人不知道2套BCx的灵敏度提高了,大多数人不确定国家推荐的BCx污染阈值(87.5%)。关于BCx治疗常见感染的知识有限。结论:卫生保健工作者对BCx的最佳收集方法和产率的了解有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology provides original, peer-reviewed scientific articles for anyone involved with an infection control or epidemiology program in a hospital or healthcare facility. Written by infection control practitioners and epidemiologists and guided by an editorial board composed of the nation''s leaders in the field, ICHE provides a critical forum for this vital information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信