An open-label, randomized phase III study of early switch maintenance vs delayed second-line nivolumab in advanced stage squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients after standard first-line platinum-based chemotherapy-EDEN trial GOIRC 04-2016.
Francesco Gelsomino, Luca Boni, Marcello Tiseo, Serena Ricciardi, Danilo Rocco, Diego L Cortinovis, Manuela Proietto, Alessio Cogoni, Giulia Pasello, Andrea Camerini, Francesca Sperandi, Ida Colantonio, Giulio Metro, Francesca Mazzoni, Editta Baldini, Antonello Veccia, Elisa Bennicelli, Anna Cecilia Bettini, Michele Tognetto, Andrea Ardizzoni
{"title":"An open-label, randomized phase III study of early switch maintenance vs delayed second-line nivolumab in advanced stage squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients after standard first-line platinum-based chemotherapy-EDEN trial GOIRC 04-2016.","authors":"Francesco Gelsomino, Luca Boni, Marcello Tiseo, Serena Ricciardi, Danilo Rocco, Diego L Cortinovis, Manuela Proietto, Alessio Cogoni, Giulia Pasello, Andrea Camerini, Francesca Sperandi, Ida Colantonio, Giulio Metro, Francesca Mazzoni, Editta Baldini, Antonello Veccia, Elisa Bennicelli, Anna Cecilia Bettini, Michele Tognetto, Andrea Ardizzoni","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.108059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As for squamous (Sq)-NSCLC, Checkmate-017 trial showed a significant overall survival (OS) improvement in favor of Nivolumab (Nivo) over Docetaxel in 2nd-line. We hypothesized that anticipating Nivo use, as early switch maintenance after 1st-line chemotherapy (CHT), might have improved survival as compared to delayed 2nd-line treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>EDEN was an open-label, 2-arm, phase III study which randomized (1:1) stage IIIB/IV Sq-NSCLC pts non-progressive after 1st-line platinum-based CHT, to receive early Nivo as switch maintenance (Arm A) or standard best supportive care followed by 2nd-line Nivo at disease progression (Arm B). In both arms, Nivo was administered at the dose of 240 mg i.v. every 2 weeks until progressive disease, intolerable toxicity, or for a maximum of 2 years. The primary endpoint was OS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From Sep 2017 to Aug 2020 125 patients (62 Arm A vs 63 Arm B) were randomized from 32 Italian centers. Accrual was stopped early, before the planned sample size (388 pts) was reached, because of registration of ICPIs in 1st-line. Most patients were male (79.2 %), current/former smokers (93.6 %), had stage IV (74.4 %), performance status 0-1 (98.4 %). mOS (95 % CI) was 14.9 (10.4-18.6) months in arm A vs 18.8 (14.4-21.1) months in arm B (HR 1.09, 95 %CI 0.74-1.62, p = 0.659).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In advanced Sq-NSCLC, the use of Nivo as switch maintenance after 1st-line CHT, does not improve OS compared to its use as 2nd-line. Although the optimal use of ICPIs remains in 1st-line, its role as maintenance has to be better investigated.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov: registration number: NCT03542461.</p>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"199 ","pages":"108059"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.108059","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: As for squamous (Sq)-NSCLC, Checkmate-017 trial showed a significant overall survival (OS) improvement in favor of Nivolumab (Nivo) over Docetaxel in 2nd-line. We hypothesized that anticipating Nivo use, as early switch maintenance after 1st-line chemotherapy (CHT), might have improved survival as compared to delayed 2nd-line treatment.
Methods: EDEN was an open-label, 2-arm, phase III study which randomized (1:1) stage IIIB/IV Sq-NSCLC pts non-progressive after 1st-line platinum-based CHT, to receive early Nivo as switch maintenance (Arm A) or standard best supportive care followed by 2nd-line Nivo at disease progression (Arm B). In both arms, Nivo was administered at the dose of 240 mg i.v. every 2 weeks until progressive disease, intolerable toxicity, or for a maximum of 2 years. The primary endpoint was OS.
Results: From Sep 2017 to Aug 2020 125 patients (62 Arm A vs 63 Arm B) were randomized from 32 Italian centers. Accrual was stopped early, before the planned sample size (388 pts) was reached, because of registration of ICPIs in 1st-line. Most patients were male (79.2 %), current/former smokers (93.6 %), had stage IV (74.4 %), performance status 0-1 (98.4 %). mOS (95 % CI) was 14.9 (10.4-18.6) months in arm A vs 18.8 (14.4-21.1) months in arm B (HR 1.09, 95 %CI 0.74-1.62, p = 0.659).
Conclusions: In advanced Sq-NSCLC, the use of Nivo as switch maintenance after 1st-line CHT, does not improve OS compared to its use as 2nd-line. Although the optimal use of ICPIs remains in 1st-line, its role as maintenance has to be better investigated.
期刊介绍：
Lung Cancer is an international publication covering the clinical, translational and basic science of malignancies of the lung and chest region.Original research articles, early reports, review articles, editorials and correspondence covering the prevention, epidemiology and etiology, basic biology, pathology, clinical assessment, surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, combined treatment modalities, other treatment modalities and outcomes of lung cancer are welcome.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
