Effect of acetic acid shockwave phonophoresis on spur morphology, foot pain and function in patients with calcaneal spur: A randomised controlled trial.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Clinical Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1177/02692155241306072
Nabil Mahmoud Abdel-Aal, Fatma Seddek Amen, Ahmad Hamdi Azzam, Mostafa Ali Elwan
{"title":"Effect of acetic acid shockwave phonophoresis on spur morphology, foot pain and function in patients with calcaneal spur: A randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Nabil Mahmoud Abdel-Aal, Fatma Seddek Amen, Ahmad Hamdi Azzam, Mostafa Ali Elwan","doi":"10.1177/02692155241306072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effect of acetic acid shockwave phonophoresis on spur morphology, foot pain, and function in patients with calcaneal spurs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A double-blinded, randomised clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Outpatients physical therapy clinics.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>One hundred forty-seven patients with calcaneal spurs, 18-65 years old, were randomly allocated to three equal groups.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The study group (A) received acetic acid shockwave phonophoresis plus conventional physical therapy. The study group (B) received shockwave therapy plus conventional physical therapy. The control group received conventional physical therapy programme only. Interventions were applied twice a week for 3 weeks.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Calcaneal spur width, calcaneal spur length, pain intensity level, pain pressure threshold and foot and ankle ability measure activities of daily living subscale were measured at baseline, after 3 weeks of interventions and after 4 weeks of follow-up with no intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between-group differences were observed for calcaneal spur width and length, pain intensity, pain pressure threshold and function after 3 weeks favouring Group A (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Mean differences (95% CI) between study groups were -1.11 mm (-1.46, -0.77) for spur width; -1.34 mm (-1.67, -1.01) for spur length; -20.71 mm (-24.66, -16.77) for pain; 1.45 kg/cm<sup>2</sup> (1.05, 1.85) for pain pressure threshold; and 12.16 points (9.24, 15.09) for function after 3 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Acetic acid shockwave phonophoresis combined with exercise clinically and statistically improves calcaneal spur width, length, pain intensity, pain pressure threshold and foot function more than shockwave therapy alone or conventional physical therapy. This method might be considered an effective, feasible, safe, non-invasive and locally applicable treatment for heel spurs.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"187-201"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241306072","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effect of acetic acid shockwave phonophoresis on spur morphology, foot pain, and function in patients with calcaneal spurs.

Design: A double-blinded, randomised clinical trial.

Setting: Outpatients physical therapy clinics.

Participants: One hundred forty-seven patients with calcaneal spurs, 18-65 years old, were randomly allocated to three equal groups.

Intervention: The study group (A) received acetic acid shockwave phonophoresis plus conventional physical therapy. The study group (B) received shockwave therapy plus conventional physical therapy. The control group received conventional physical therapy programme only. Interventions were applied twice a week for 3 weeks.

Outcome measures: Calcaneal spur width, calcaneal spur length, pain intensity level, pain pressure threshold and foot and ankle ability measure activities of daily living subscale were measured at baseline, after 3 weeks of interventions and after 4 weeks of follow-up with no intervention.

Results: Between-group differences were observed for calcaneal spur width and length, pain intensity, pain pressure threshold and function after 3 weeks favouring Group A (p < 0.001). Mean differences (95% CI) between study groups were -1.11 mm (-1.46, -0.77) for spur width; -1.34 mm (-1.67, -1.01) for spur length; -20.71 mm (-24.66, -16.77) for pain; 1.45 kg/cm2 (1.05, 1.85) for pain pressure threshold; and 12.16 points (9.24, 15.09) for function after 3 weeks.

Conclusions: Acetic acid shockwave phonophoresis combined with exercise clinically and statistically improves calcaneal spur width, length, pain intensity, pain pressure threshold and foot function more than shockwave therapy alone or conventional physical therapy. This method might be considered an effective, feasible, safe, non-invasive and locally applicable treatment for heel spurs.

醋酸冲击波语音电泳对跟骨刺患者骨刺形态、足部疼痛和功能的影响:一项随机对照试验。
目的:探讨乙酸冲击波声泳对跟骨刺患者足部形态、足部疼痛及功能的影响。设计:双盲随机临床试验。单位:门诊物理治疗诊所。参与者:147名18-65岁的跟骨刺患者被随机分为三组。干预:实验组(A组)采用醋酸冲击波声泳术加常规物理治疗。B组采用冲击波治疗加常规物理治疗。对照组仅接受常规物理治疗方案。干预措施每周两次,持续3周。结果测量:分别在基线、干预3周后和无干预随访4周后测量跟骨刺宽度、跟骨刺长度、疼痛强度水平、痛压阈值和足踝能力测量日常生活活动亚量表。结果:3周后跟骨刺宽度和长度、疼痛强度、痛压阈值和功能组间差异优于A组(p < 2 (1.05, 1.85);3周后功能评分12.16分(9.24分,15.09分)。结论:醋酸冲击波声泳联合运动治疗对跟骨刺宽度、长度、疼痛强度、痛压阈值及足部功能的改善在临床和统计学上均优于单纯冲击波治疗或常规物理治疗。该方法是一种有效、可行、安全、无创、局部适用的治疗足跟骨刺的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信