Surgical management of testicular cancer with limited retroperitoneal disease.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Current Opinion in Urology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1097/MOU.0000000000001253
Silvan Sigg, Christian Rothermundt, Christian Daniel Fankhauser
{"title":"Surgical management of testicular cancer with limited retroperitoneal disease.","authors":"Silvan Sigg, Christian Rothermundt, Christian Daniel Fankhauser","doi":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Chemotherapy offers excellent long-term survival rates for men with clinical stage II germ cell tumours. However, in this predominantly younger population, chemotherapy is associated with long-term adverse effects. Primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) may serve as an alternative treatment option, preserving oncological safety while potentially reducing adverse effects in men with limited retroperitoneal disease.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The rate of negative surgical specimens (pN0) in primary RPLND series varies between 4% and 16% in seminoma and 12-29% in nonseminoma, respectively. This suggests that early restaging, novel biomarkers, and/or percutaneous biopsies should be considered to minimize overtreatment. In stage II seminoma, three prospective RPLND series with follow-up periods ranging from 22 to 51 months report recurrence rates between 6% and 30%. In contrast, only retrospective data are available for stage II nonseminoma, with follow-up periods and recurrence rates yet to be fully defined. Following primary RPLND with confirmed viable cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy reduces recurrence risk. In cases of recurrence after primary RPLND, first-line chemotherapy remains a highly effective salvage option. Ongoing research is needed to identify risk factors for contralateral retroperitoneal disease to refine surgical templates and to determine predictors of recurrence, allowing for more personalized decisions regarding the use of adjuvant chemotherapy and follow-up strategies.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Men with clinical stage II germ cell tumours may benefit from RPLND due to its lower risk of long-term side effects. Chemotherapy is an effective salvage treatment if needed. Although RPLND is a safe and promising option, further studies are required to better understand relapse risks and to tailor treatment plans based on individual patient factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":11093,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Urology","volume":" ","pages":"178-188"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000001253","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Chemotherapy offers excellent long-term survival rates for men with clinical stage II germ cell tumours. However, in this predominantly younger population, chemotherapy is associated with long-term adverse effects. Primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) may serve as an alternative treatment option, preserving oncological safety while potentially reducing adverse effects in men with limited retroperitoneal disease.

Recent findings: The rate of negative surgical specimens (pN0) in primary RPLND series varies between 4% and 16% in seminoma and 12-29% in nonseminoma, respectively. This suggests that early restaging, novel biomarkers, and/or percutaneous biopsies should be considered to minimize overtreatment. In stage II seminoma, three prospective RPLND series with follow-up periods ranging from 22 to 51 months report recurrence rates between 6% and 30%. In contrast, only retrospective data are available for stage II nonseminoma, with follow-up periods and recurrence rates yet to be fully defined. Following primary RPLND with confirmed viable cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy reduces recurrence risk. In cases of recurrence after primary RPLND, first-line chemotherapy remains a highly effective salvage option. Ongoing research is needed to identify risk factors for contralateral retroperitoneal disease to refine surgical templates and to determine predictors of recurrence, allowing for more personalized decisions regarding the use of adjuvant chemotherapy and follow-up strategies.

Summary: Men with clinical stage II germ cell tumours may benefit from RPLND due to its lower risk of long-term side effects. Chemotherapy is an effective salvage treatment if needed. Although RPLND is a safe and promising option, further studies are required to better understand relapse risks and to tailor treatment plans based on individual patient factors.

局限性腹膜后病变睾丸癌的手术治疗。
回顾目的:化疗为临床II期生殖细胞肿瘤患者提供了极好的长期生存率。然而,在以年轻人群为主的人群中,化疗与长期不良反应有关。原发性腹膜后淋巴结清扫术(RPLND)可以作为一种替代治疗方案,在保留肿瘤安全性的同时潜在地减少局限性腹膜后疾病男性的不良反应。近期发现:原发RPLND系列的手术标本阴性率(pN0)在精原细胞瘤和非精原细胞瘤中分别为4% - 16%和12-29%。这表明应考虑早期重新分期、新的生物标志物和/或经皮活检来减少过度治疗。在II期精原细胞瘤中,随访22至51个月的三个前瞻性RPLND系列报告复发率在6%至30%之间。相比之下,只有II期非精原细胞瘤的回顾性数据,随访期和复发率尚未完全确定。原发性RPLND确诊存活后,辅助化疗可降低复发风险。在原发性RPLND后复发的病例中,一线化疗仍然是一种非常有效的挽救选择。需要进行研究来确定对侧腹膜后疾病的危险因素,以完善手术模板并确定复发预测因素,从而在使用辅助化疗和随访策略方面做出更个性化的决定。总结:临床II期生殖细胞肿瘤的男性可能受益于RPLND,因为其长期副作用的风险较低。如果需要,化疗是一种有效的救助性治疗。尽管RPLND是一种安全且有前景的选择,但需要进一步的研究来更好地了解复发风险,并根据患者的个体因素制定治疗计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Urology
Current Opinion in Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
140
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Urology delivers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and most exciting developments in urology from across the world. Published bimonthly and featuring ten key topics – including focuses on prostate cancer, bladder cancer and minimally invasive urology – the journal’s renowned team of guest editors ensure a balanced, expert assessment of the recently published literature in each respective field with insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信