Wearable smart glasses for first-person video analysis to evaluate nursing skills: A pilot study with a mixed method design

IF 5.1 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Sun Kyung Kim, Youngho Lee, Hye Ri Hwang, Oe Nam Kim
{"title":"Wearable smart glasses for first-person video analysis to evaluate nursing skills: A pilot study with a mixed method design","authors":"Sun Kyung Kim,&nbsp;Youngho Lee,&nbsp;Hye Ri Hwang,&nbsp;Oe Nam Kim","doi":"10.1111/jcal.13080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Comprehensive assessment of skills and performance are necessary to improve the quality of care in nursing education. Various factors pose challenges to accurate assessments, including high student–teacher ratio and observer bias.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To establish an assessment system based on first-person video of smart glasses and validate its usability and feasibility.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We used two cameras (smart glasses for first-person perspective and a web cam) to perform video analysis for skill and performance assessments. Usability tests were conducted using quantitative and qualitative questionnaires for the usefulness and acceptability of the current assessment system. Data from standardised checklists for three clinical nursing skills (intramuscular injection, endotracheal suction, and Levin tube feeding) were used to analyse the inter-rater reliability in addition to Fleiss' Kappa coefficient analysis. A total of 22 participants (18 students and 4 reviewers) were recruited. They completed the study. Apart from physical discomfort component, the proposed smart glasses-based first-person video assessment system achieved good usability scores from both students and reviewers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results and Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Fleiss' Kappa values for individual items ranged from 0.450 to 0.808, with an overall average value of 0.592. Results of this study validated the potential of smart glasses-based assessment system where a set of beneficial mechanisms may meaningfully support the formative learning process. However, issues regarding upgrading the device and need for guidelines for roles of raters and students still remain.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcal.13080","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Comprehensive assessment of skills and performance are necessary to improve the quality of care in nursing education. Various factors pose challenges to accurate assessments, including high student–teacher ratio and observer bias.

Objectives

To establish an assessment system based on first-person video of smart glasses and validate its usability and feasibility.

Methods

We used two cameras (smart glasses for first-person perspective and a web cam) to perform video analysis for skill and performance assessments. Usability tests were conducted using quantitative and qualitative questionnaires for the usefulness and acceptability of the current assessment system. Data from standardised checklists for three clinical nursing skills (intramuscular injection, endotracheal suction, and Levin tube feeding) were used to analyse the inter-rater reliability in addition to Fleiss' Kappa coefficient analysis. A total of 22 participants (18 students and 4 reviewers) were recruited. They completed the study. Apart from physical discomfort component, the proposed smart glasses-based first-person video assessment system achieved good usability scores from both students and reviewers.

Results and Conclusions

Fleiss' Kappa values for individual items ranged from 0.450 to 0.808, with an overall average value of 0.592. Results of this study validated the potential of smart glasses-based assessment system where a set of beneficial mechanisms may meaningfully support the formative learning process. However, issues regarding upgrading the device and need for guidelines for roles of raters and students still remain.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.00%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: The Journal of Computer Assisted Learning is an international peer-reviewed journal which covers the whole range of uses of information and communication technology to support learning and knowledge exchange. It aims to provide a medium for communication among researchers as well as a channel linking researchers, practitioners, and policy makers. JCAL is also a rich source of material for master and PhD students in areas such as educational psychology, the learning sciences, instructional technology, instructional design, collaborative learning, intelligent learning systems, learning analytics, open, distance and networked learning, and educational evaluation and assessment. This is the case for formal (e.g., schools), non-formal (e.g., workplace learning) and informal learning (e.g., museums and libraries) situations and environments. Volumes often include one Special Issue which these provides readers with a broad and in-depth perspective on a specific topic. First published in 1985, JCAL continues to have the aim of making the outcomes of contemporary research and experience accessible. During this period there have been major technological advances offering new opportunities and approaches in the use of a wide range of technologies to support learning and knowledge transfer more generally. There is currently much emphasis on the use of network functionality and the challenges its appropriate uses pose to teachers/tutors working with students locally and at a distance. JCAL welcomes: -Empirical reports, single studies or programmatic series of studies on the use of computers and information technologies in learning and assessment -Critical and original meta-reviews of literature on the use of computers for learning -Empirical studies on the design and development of innovative technology-based systems for learning -Conceptual articles on issues relating to the Aims and Scope
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信