AI-assisted research collaboration with open data for fair and effective response to call for proposals

IF 2.5 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Ai Magazine Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1002/aaai.12203
Siva Likitha Valluru, Michael Widener, Biplav Srivastava, Sriraam Natarajan, Sugata Gangopadhyay
{"title":"AI-assisted research collaboration with open data for fair and effective response to call for proposals","authors":"Siva Likitha Valluru,&nbsp;Michael Widener,&nbsp;Biplav Srivastava,&nbsp;Sriraam Natarajan,&nbsp;Sugata Gangopadhyay","doi":"10.1002/aaai.12203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Building teams and promoting collaboration are two very common business activities. An example of these are seen in the <i>TeamingForFunding</i> problem, where research institutions and researchers are interested to identify collaborative opportunities when applying to funding agencies in response to latter's calls for proposals. We describe a novel <i>deployed</i> system to recommend teams using a variety of Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods, such that (1) each team achieves the highest possible skill coverage that is demanded by the opportunity, and (2) the workload of distributing the opportunities is balanced among the candidate members. We address these questions by extracting skills latent in open data of proposal calls (demand) and researcher profiles (supply), normalizing them using taxonomies, and creating efficient algorithms that match demand to supply. We create teams to maximize goodness along a novel metric balancing short- and long-term objectives. We evaluate our system in two diverse settings in US and India of researchers and proposal calls, at two different time instants about 1 year apart (total 4 settings), to establish generality of our approach, and deploy it at a major US university. We validate the effectiveness of our algorithms (1) quantitatively, by evaluating the recommended teams using a goodness score and find that more informed methods lead to recommendations of smaller number of teams and higher goodness, and (2) qualitatively, by conducting a large-scale user study at a college-wide level, and demonstrate that users overall found the tool very useful and relevant.</p>","PeriodicalId":7854,"journal":{"name":"Ai Magazine","volume":"45 4","pages":"457-471"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aaai.12203","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ai Magazine","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aaai.12203","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Building teams and promoting collaboration are two very common business activities. An example of these are seen in the TeamingForFunding problem, where research institutions and researchers are interested to identify collaborative opportunities when applying to funding agencies in response to latter's calls for proposals. We describe a novel deployed system to recommend teams using a variety of Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods, such that (1) each team achieves the highest possible skill coverage that is demanded by the opportunity, and (2) the workload of distributing the opportunities is balanced among the candidate members. We address these questions by extracting skills latent in open data of proposal calls (demand) and researcher profiles (supply), normalizing them using taxonomies, and creating efficient algorithms that match demand to supply. We create teams to maximize goodness along a novel metric balancing short- and long-term objectives. We evaluate our system in two diverse settings in US and India of researchers and proposal calls, at two different time instants about 1 year apart (total 4 settings), to establish generality of our approach, and deploy it at a major US university. We validate the effectiveness of our algorithms (1) quantitatively, by evaluating the recommended teams using a goodness score and find that more informed methods lead to recommendations of smaller number of teams and higher goodness, and (2) qualitatively, by conducting a large-scale user study at a college-wide level, and demonstrate that users overall found the tool very useful and relevant.

Abstract Image

利用开放数据进行人工智能辅助研究合作,以公平有效地响应提案征集
构建团队和促进协作是两个非常常见的业务活动。在TeamingForFunding问题中可以看到一个例子,研究机构和研究人员在向资助机构申请提案时,有兴趣确定合作机会。我们描述了一个新的部署系统,使用各种人工智能(AI)方法来推荐团队,这样(1)每个团队都达到了机会所需的最高技能覆盖率,(2)分配机会的工作量在候选成员之间是平衡的。我们通过提取提案呼叫(需求)和研究人员简介(供应)的公开数据中潜在的技能来解决这些问题,使用分类法对它们进行规范化,并创建匹配需求与供应的有效算法。我们创建团队,沿着平衡短期和长期目标的新度量最大化优秀。我们在美国和印度的两个不同的研究人员和提案电话环境中评估了我们的系统,在两个不同的时间点,大约相隔1年(总共4个环境),以建立我们方法的通用性,并在美国一所主要大学部署它。我们验证了我们的算法的有效性(1)定量地,通过使用优度评分评估推荐的团队,发现更明智的方法导致推荐的团队数量更少,优度更高;(2)定性地,通过在大学范围内进行大规模的用户研究,并证明用户总体上认为该工具非常有用和相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ai Magazine
Ai Magazine 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
61
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: AI Magazine publishes original articles that are reasonably self-contained and aimed at a broad spectrum of the AI community. Technical content should be kept to a minimum. In general, the magazine does not publish articles that have been published elsewhere in whole or in part. The magazine welcomes the contribution of articles on the theory and practice of AI as well as general survey articles, tutorial articles on timely topics, conference or symposia or workshop reports, and timely columns on topics of interest to AI scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信