A Monitoring Tool for the Evaluation of Program Outcomes in Engineering Education

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Muhammet Yorulmaz, Barış Keçeci, Yusuf Tansel İç, Mehmet Gülşen, Berna Dengiz
{"title":"A Monitoring Tool for the Evaluation of Program Outcomes in Engineering Education","authors":"Muhammet Yorulmaz,&nbsp;Barış Keçeci,&nbsp;Yusuf Tansel İç,&nbsp;Mehmet Gülşen,&nbsp;Berna Dengiz","doi":"10.1002/cae.22812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>During the evaluation process, organizations that accredit engineering programs determine whether a program meets a list of predetermined criteria. One criterion on the list is Program Outcomes (POs). The most common weakness statement is found in this criterion. First, we aim to develop a model that can support program evaluation during the accreditation process. Second, the proposed approach can be used as a feedback tool in the continuous improvement of teaching in engineering programs. The course instructor runs the first module, which predefined learning outcomes and the POs are linked together using an Excel-based software for each activity performed in the course. The second module calculates the scores that reflect the achievement levels of the POs for the whole program. The scores from individual courses are simultaneously transferred to the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution module that determines the rating scores of the POs in the program. The proposed system shows which POs are at a satisfactory level and which are lagging behind and need attention. It helps the course administrators to manage the course material proactively. The proposed system is a powerful tool for monitoring and tracking POs, and it is the primary tool used by program administrators to improve the program continuously. It is particularly useful in identifying the weak spots of the program. The successful implementation of the system in our department since 2012 makes us confident that the system could be adopted by other engineering programs.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50643,"journal":{"name":"Computer Applications in Engineering Education","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Applications in Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cae.22812","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the evaluation process, organizations that accredit engineering programs determine whether a program meets a list of predetermined criteria. One criterion on the list is Program Outcomes (POs). The most common weakness statement is found in this criterion. First, we aim to develop a model that can support program evaluation during the accreditation process. Second, the proposed approach can be used as a feedback tool in the continuous improvement of teaching in engineering programs. The course instructor runs the first module, which predefined learning outcomes and the POs are linked together using an Excel-based software for each activity performed in the course. The second module calculates the scores that reflect the achievement levels of the POs for the whole program. The scores from individual courses are simultaneously transferred to the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution module that determines the rating scores of the POs in the program. The proposed system shows which POs are at a satisfactory level and which are lagging behind and need attention. It helps the course administrators to manage the course material proactively. The proposed system is a powerful tool for monitoring and tracking POs, and it is the primary tool used by program administrators to improve the program continuously. It is particularly useful in identifying the weak spots of the program. The successful implementation of the system in our department since 2012 makes us confident that the system could be adopted by other engineering programs.

工程教育项目成果评估监测工具
在评估过程中,认证工程项目的组织确定项目是否符合预定的标准列表。清单上的一个标准是项目成果(POs)。最常见的缺点陈述出现在这个标准中。首先,我们的目标是开发一个可以在认证过程中支持项目评估的模型。其次,该方法可作为工程专业教学持续改进的反馈工具。课程讲师运行第一个模块,其中预定义的学习成果和POs使用基于excel的软件将课程中执行的每个活动链接在一起。第二个模块计算反映整个程序的POs的成就水平的分数。单个课程的分数同时被转移到“理想解决方案相似性排序偏好技术”模块,该模块确定项目中POs的评分分数。拟议的系统显示了哪些POs处于令人满意的水平,哪些是落后的,需要注意。它可以帮助课程管理员主动管理课程资料。该系统是监测和跟踪POs的有力工具,也是项目管理员持续改进项目的主要工具。它在识别程序的弱点方面特别有用。该系统自2012年以来在我系的成功实施,使我们有信心该系统可以被其他工程项目采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computer Applications in Engineering Education
Computer Applications in Engineering Education 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
100
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Computer Applications in Engineering Education provides a forum for publishing peer-reviewed timely information on the innovative uses of computers, Internet, and software tools in engineering education. Besides new courses and software tools, the CAE journal covers areas that support the integration of technology-based modules in the engineering curriculum and promotes discussion of the assessment and dissemination issues associated with these new implementation methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信