Evaluation of the effect of essential oil aromatherapy on anxiety and pain during administration of local anesthesia in children: a randomized clinical trial.

Aarti Yadav, Sandeep A Bailwad, Akash Bhatnagar, Medha Roy
{"title":"Evaluation of the effect of essential oil aromatherapy on anxiety and pain during administration of local anesthesia in children: a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Aarti Yadav, Sandeep A Bailwad, Akash Bhatnagar, Medha Roy","doi":"10.17245/jdapm.2024.24.6.395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The key to a child's treatment success in a pediatric dental setting is to control discomfort and anxiety. The proposed method supports the execution of a non-aversive behavior management scheme. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of essential oil aromatherapy on anxiety and pain associated with the administration of local anesthesia (LA) in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 176 children (87 girls and 89 boys) aged 6-9 years, who were randomly divided into two groups. Group 1 received aromatherapy with essential oil using a nebulizer for 2 min with a 10-min induction period before the administration of LA. Group 2 (control group) was managed using non-pharmacological behavioral techniques. Baseline anxiety levels were recorded for all children before the intervention. LA was administered according to a standard protocol. Postprocedural pain and anxiety were assessed using the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (WBFPRS); Visual Analog Scale (VAS); Sound, Eye, Motor (SEM) scale; and Modified Child Dental Anxiety Scale (MCDAS)(f). Data were analyzed using SPSS version 21.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Mann-Whitney U test revealed a statistically significant difference in anxiety MCDAS(f) scores between the groups at both baseline (P = 0.022) and post-procedure (P = 0.001). The Wilcoxon signed-rank test also indicated a statistically significant change in anxiety scores within each group from baseline to post-procedure (P = 0.001). Furthermore, VAS, analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test, demonstrated a significant difference between the groups (P = 0.001). Pain scores measured using WBFPRS and SEM scales were significantly lower in the aromatherapy group, as determined using the chi-square test.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prior use of essential oil aromatherapy can effectively reduce anxiety and pain in children during the administration of LA.</p>","PeriodicalId":94330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":"24 6","pages":"395-406"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11650454/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2024.24.6.395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The key to a child's treatment success in a pediatric dental setting is to control discomfort and anxiety. The proposed method supports the execution of a non-aversive behavior management scheme. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of essential oil aromatherapy on anxiety and pain associated with the administration of local anesthesia (LA) in children.

Methods: This study included 176 children (87 girls and 89 boys) aged 6-9 years, who were randomly divided into two groups. Group 1 received aromatherapy with essential oil using a nebulizer for 2 min with a 10-min induction period before the administration of LA. Group 2 (control group) was managed using non-pharmacological behavioral techniques. Baseline anxiety levels were recorded for all children before the intervention. LA was administered according to a standard protocol. Postprocedural pain and anxiety were assessed using the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (WBFPRS); Visual Analog Scale (VAS); Sound, Eye, Motor (SEM) scale; and Modified Child Dental Anxiety Scale (MCDAS)(f). Data were analyzed using SPSS version 21.0.

Results: The Mann-Whitney U test revealed a statistically significant difference in anxiety MCDAS(f) scores between the groups at both baseline (P = 0.022) and post-procedure (P = 0.001). The Wilcoxon signed-rank test also indicated a statistically significant change in anxiety scores within each group from baseline to post-procedure (P = 0.001). Furthermore, VAS, analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test, demonstrated a significant difference between the groups (P = 0.001). Pain scores measured using WBFPRS and SEM scales were significantly lower in the aromatherapy group, as determined using the chi-square test.

Conclusion: Prior use of essential oil aromatherapy can effectively reduce anxiety and pain in children during the administration of LA.

评估精油芳香疗法对儿童局部麻醉期间焦虑和疼痛的影响:一项随机临床试验。
背景:儿童牙科治疗成功的关键是控制不适和焦虑。所提出的方法支持非厌恶行为管理方案的执行。本研究旨在评估精油芳香疗法对儿童局部麻醉(LA)相关焦虑和疼痛的影响。方法:选取176名6 ~ 9岁的儿童(女孩87例,男孩89例),随机分为两组。组1在给药前使用喷雾器进行香薰精油治疗2分钟,诱导期10分钟。第二组(对照组)采用非药物行为技术。在干预前记录所有儿童的基线焦虑水平。根据标准方案给药。术后疼痛和焦虑采用Wong-Baker面部疼痛评定量表(WBFPRS)进行评估;视觉模拟量表;声、眼、动(SEM)量表;修订儿童牙科焦虑量表(MCDAS)(f)。数据分析采用SPSS 21.0版。结果:Mann-Whitney U检验显示,两组在基线(P = 0.022)和术后(P = 0.001)的焦虑MCDAS(f)评分有统计学显著差异。Wilcoxon符号秩检验还显示,从基线到手术后,每组的焦虑评分都有统计学上显著的变化(P = 0.001)。此外,使用Mann-Whitney U检验进行VAS分析,显示组间存在显著差异(P = 0.001)。使用WBFPRS和SEM量表测量的疼痛评分在芳香疗法组中显着降低,使用卡方检验确定。结论:事先使用精油芳香疗法可有效减轻儿童在给药期间的焦虑和疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信