A Meta-Analysis of Levofloxacin for Contacts of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis.

NEJM evidence Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1056/EVIDoa2400190
Trinh Duong, Joanna Brigden, H Simon Schaaf, Frances Garden, Ben J Marais, Thu Anh Nguyen, Ian R White, Diana M Gibb, Nguyen Viet Nhung, Neil A Martinson, Lee Fairlie, Leonardo Martinez, Charlotte Layton, Andrea Benedetti, Guy B Marks, Rebecca M Turner, James A Seddon, Anneke C Hesseling, Greg J Fox
{"title":"A Meta-Analysis of Levofloxacin for Contacts of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis.","authors":"Trinh Duong, Joanna Brigden, H Simon Schaaf, Frances Garden, Ben J Marais, Thu Anh Nguyen, Ian R White, Diana M Gibb, Nguyen Viet Nhung, Neil A Martinson, Lee Fairlie, Leonardo Martinez, Charlotte Layton, Andrea Benedetti, Guy B Marks, Rebecca M Turner, James A Seddon, Anneke C Hesseling, Greg J Fox","doi":"10.1056/EVIDoa2400190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data from randomized trials evaluating the effectiveness of tuberculosis (TB) preventive treatment for contacts of multidrug-resistant (MDR)-TB are lacking. Two recently published randomized trials that did not achieve statistical significance provide the opportunity for a meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted combined analyses of two phase 3 trials of levofloxacin MDR-TB preventive treatment - Levofloxacin for the Prevention of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis (VQUIN) trial and the Levofloxacin preventive treatment in children exposed to MDR-TB (TB-CHAMP) trial. Following MDR-TB household exposure, VQUIN enrolled mainly adults in Vietnam; TB-CHAMP enrolled mainly young children in South Africa. Random assignment in both trials was 1:1 at the household level to daily levofloxacin or placebo for 6 months. The primary outcome was incident TB by 54 weeks. We estimated the treatment effect overall using individual participant data meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The VQUIN trial (n=2041) randomly assigned 1023 participants to levofloxacin and 1018 participants to placebo; TB-CHAMP (n=922) assigned 453 participants to levofloxacin and 469 participants to placebo. Median age was 40 years (interquartile range 28 to 52 years) in VQUIN and 2.8 years (interquartile range 1.3 to 4.2 years) in TB-CHAMP. Overall, 8 levofloxacin-group participants developed TB by 54 weeks versus 21 placebo-group participants; the relative difference in cumulative incidence was 0.41 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.18 to 0.92; P=0.03). No association was observed between levofloxacin and grade 3 or above adverse events (risk ratio 1.07, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.65). Musculoskeletal events of any grade occurred more frequently in the levofloxacin group (risk ratio 6.36, 95% CI 4.30 to 9.42), but not among children under 10 years of age. Overall, four levofloxacin-group participants and three placebo-group participants had grade 3 events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this meta-analysis of two randomized trials, levofloxacin was associated with a 60% relative reduction in TB incidence among adult and child household MDR-TB contacts, but with an increased risk of musculoskeletal adverse events. (Funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, UNITAID, and others.).</p>","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":" ","pages":"EVIDoa2400190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEJM evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDoa2400190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Data from randomized trials evaluating the effectiveness of tuberculosis (TB) preventive treatment for contacts of multidrug-resistant (MDR)-TB are lacking. Two recently published randomized trials that did not achieve statistical significance provide the opportunity for a meta-analysis.

Methods: We conducted combined analyses of two phase 3 trials of levofloxacin MDR-TB preventive treatment - Levofloxacin for the Prevention of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis (VQUIN) trial and the Levofloxacin preventive treatment in children exposed to MDR-TB (TB-CHAMP) trial. Following MDR-TB household exposure, VQUIN enrolled mainly adults in Vietnam; TB-CHAMP enrolled mainly young children in South Africa. Random assignment in both trials was 1:1 at the household level to daily levofloxacin or placebo for 6 months. The primary outcome was incident TB by 54 weeks. We estimated the treatment effect overall using individual participant data meta-analysis.

Results: The VQUIN trial (n=2041) randomly assigned 1023 participants to levofloxacin and 1018 participants to placebo; TB-CHAMP (n=922) assigned 453 participants to levofloxacin and 469 participants to placebo. Median age was 40 years (interquartile range 28 to 52 years) in VQUIN and 2.8 years (interquartile range 1.3 to 4.2 years) in TB-CHAMP. Overall, 8 levofloxacin-group participants developed TB by 54 weeks versus 21 placebo-group participants; the relative difference in cumulative incidence was 0.41 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.18 to 0.92; P=0.03). No association was observed between levofloxacin and grade 3 or above adverse events (risk ratio 1.07, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.65). Musculoskeletal events of any grade occurred more frequently in the levofloxacin group (risk ratio 6.36, 95% CI 4.30 to 9.42), but not among children under 10 years of age. Overall, four levofloxacin-group participants and three placebo-group participants had grade 3 events.

Conclusions: In this meta-analysis of two randomized trials, levofloxacin was associated with a 60% relative reduction in TB incidence among adult and child household MDR-TB contacts, but with an increased risk of musculoskeletal adverse events. (Funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, UNITAID, and others.).

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信