Kathleen M O'Leary, Rebecca Henderson, Joanne N Caldwell Odgers, Benjamin N Meadley
{"title":"Maintenance of normothermia in the out-of-hospital setting: A pilot comparative crossover study of a foil blanket versus self-warming blanket.","authors":"Kathleen M O'Leary, Rebecca Henderson, Joanne N Caldwell Odgers, Benjamin N Meadley","doi":"10.1016/j.auec.2024.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hypothermia can increase mortality in certain patients. Paramedics apply cotton and foil \"space\" blankets for warming, yet their effectiveness remains uncertain. This pilot study aimed to evaluate combining cotton blankets with a self-warming blanket versus a combination of cotton blankets and a foil blanket in an out-of-hospital simulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight participants were allocated to warming with either two cotton blankets and one foil blanket, or two cotton blankets and one self-warming blanket, with the alternate method applied in a subsequent session. Participants were cooled using an ice-vest and fan until shivering onset, after which the warming method was applied. Simulation involved transitioning through three environments: baseline (22 °C), cooling/warming (16 °C), and \"ambulance\" (27 °C). Core temperature was monitored via oesophageal probe, skin temperature via thermistors (recorded every minute), and tympanic temperature and thermal sensation and comfort were recorded five minutely.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were minor differences in thermal sensation. For the primary outcome there was no significant difference between blanket methods (core: foil 36.98 ± 0.08 °C vs. self-warming 36.95 ± 0.10 °C, P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of cotton and self-warming blankets did not exhibit superiority compared to cotton and foil blankets in out-of-hospital simulation. Future research should explore alternative warming methodologies to optimise normothermia maintenance.</p>","PeriodicalId":55979,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.auec.2024.12.001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Hypothermia can increase mortality in certain patients. Paramedics apply cotton and foil "space" blankets for warming, yet their effectiveness remains uncertain. This pilot study aimed to evaluate combining cotton blankets with a self-warming blanket versus a combination of cotton blankets and a foil blanket in an out-of-hospital simulation.
Methods: Eight participants were allocated to warming with either two cotton blankets and one foil blanket, or two cotton blankets and one self-warming blanket, with the alternate method applied in a subsequent session. Participants were cooled using an ice-vest and fan until shivering onset, after which the warming method was applied. Simulation involved transitioning through three environments: baseline (22 °C), cooling/warming (16 °C), and "ambulance" (27 °C). Core temperature was monitored via oesophageal probe, skin temperature via thermistors (recorded every minute), and tympanic temperature and thermal sensation and comfort were recorded five minutely.
Results: There were minor differences in thermal sensation. For the primary outcome there was no significant difference between blanket methods (core: foil 36.98 ± 0.08 °C vs. self-warming 36.95 ± 0.10 °C, P > 0.05).
Conclusion: The combination of cotton and self-warming blankets did not exhibit superiority compared to cotton and foil blankets in out-of-hospital simulation. Future research should explore alternative warming methodologies to optimise normothermia maintenance.
期刊介绍:
Australasian Emergency Care is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to supporting emergency nurses, physicians, paramedics and other professionals in advancing the science and practice of emergency care, wherever it is delivered. As the official journal of the College of Emergency Nursing Australasia (CENA), Australasian Emergency Care is a conduit for clinical, applied, and theoretical research and knowledge that advances the science and practice of emergency care in original, innovative and challenging ways. The journal serves as a leading voice for the emergency care community, reflecting its inter-professional diversity, and the importance of collaboration and shared decision-making to achieve quality patient outcomes. It is strongly focussed on advancing the patient experience and quality of care across the emergency care continuum, spanning the pre-hospital, hospital and post-hospital settings within Australasia and beyond.