Maintenance of normothermia in the out-of-hospital setting: A pilot comparative crossover study of a foil blanket versus self-warming blanket.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Kathleen M O'Leary, Rebecca Henderson, Joanne N Caldwell Odgers, Benjamin N Meadley
{"title":"Maintenance of normothermia in the out-of-hospital setting: A pilot comparative crossover study of a foil blanket versus self-warming blanket.","authors":"Kathleen M O'Leary, Rebecca Henderson, Joanne N Caldwell Odgers, Benjamin N Meadley","doi":"10.1016/j.auec.2024.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hypothermia can increase mortality in certain patients. Paramedics apply cotton and foil \"space\" blankets for warming, yet their effectiveness remains uncertain. This pilot study aimed to evaluate combining cotton blankets with a self-warming blanket versus a combination of cotton blankets and a foil blanket in an out-of-hospital simulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight participants were allocated to warming with either two cotton blankets and one foil blanket, or two cotton blankets and one self-warming blanket, with the alternate method applied in a subsequent session. Participants were cooled using an ice-vest and fan until shivering onset, after which the warming method was applied. Simulation involved transitioning through three environments: baseline (22 °C), cooling/warming (16 °C), and \"ambulance\" (27 °C). Core temperature was monitored via oesophageal probe, skin temperature via thermistors (recorded every minute), and tympanic temperature and thermal sensation and comfort were recorded five minutely.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were minor differences in thermal sensation. For the primary outcome there was no significant difference between blanket methods (core: foil 36.98 ± 0.08 °C vs. self-warming 36.95 ± 0.10 °C, P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of cotton and self-warming blankets did not exhibit superiority compared to cotton and foil blankets in out-of-hospital simulation. Future research should explore alternative warming methodologies to optimise normothermia maintenance.</p>","PeriodicalId":55979,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.auec.2024.12.001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Hypothermia can increase mortality in certain patients. Paramedics apply cotton and foil "space" blankets for warming, yet their effectiveness remains uncertain. This pilot study aimed to evaluate combining cotton blankets with a self-warming blanket versus a combination of cotton blankets and a foil blanket in an out-of-hospital simulation.

Methods: Eight participants were allocated to warming with either two cotton blankets and one foil blanket, or two cotton blankets and one self-warming blanket, with the alternate method applied in a subsequent session. Participants were cooled using an ice-vest and fan until shivering onset, after which the warming method was applied. Simulation involved transitioning through three environments: baseline (22 °C), cooling/warming (16 °C), and "ambulance" (27 °C). Core temperature was monitored via oesophageal probe, skin temperature via thermistors (recorded every minute), and tympanic temperature and thermal sensation and comfort were recorded five minutely.

Results: There were minor differences in thermal sensation. For the primary outcome there was no significant difference between blanket methods (core: foil 36.98 ± 0.08 °C vs. self-warming 36.95 ± 0.10 °C, P > 0.05).

Conclusion: The combination of cotton and self-warming blankets did not exhibit superiority compared to cotton and foil blankets in out-of-hospital simulation. Future research should explore alternative warming methodologies to optimise normothermia maintenance.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Emergency Care
Australasian Emergency Care Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
82
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Australasian Emergency Care is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to supporting emergency nurses, physicians, paramedics and other professionals in advancing the science and practice of emergency care, wherever it is delivered. As the official journal of the College of Emergency Nursing Australasia (CENA), Australasian Emergency Care is a conduit for clinical, applied, and theoretical research and knowledge that advances the science and practice of emergency care in original, innovative and challenging ways. The journal serves as a leading voice for the emergency care community, reflecting its inter-professional diversity, and the importance of collaboration and shared decision-making to achieve quality patient outcomes. It is strongly focussed on advancing the patient experience and quality of care across the emergency care continuum, spanning the pre-hospital, hospital and post-hospital settings within Australasia and beyond.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信