Medications for Opioid Use Disorder Among Transition Age Youth Compared to Adults 26 or Older in Rural Settings

José M. Flores MD, PhD , Emily Kan PhD , Larissa J. Mooney MD , Huyen Pham PhD , Yuhui Zhu PhD , Kate Wolitzky-Taylor PhD , Yih-Ing Hser PhD
{"title":"Medications for Opioid Use Disorder Among Transition Age Youth Compared to Adults 26 or Older in Rural Settings","authors":"José M. Flores MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Emily Kan PhD ,&nbsp;Larissa J. Mooney MD ,&nbsp;Huyen Pham PhD ,&nbsp;Yuhui Zhu PhD ,&nbsp;Kate Wolitzky-Taylor PhD ,&nbsp;Yih-Ing Hser PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jaacop.2024.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Transition age youth (TAY), aged 18 to 25 years, face barriers to medication treatment for opioid use disorder (MOUD), resulting in lower retention. We evaluated OUD prevalence and MOUD receipt comparing TAY to adults aged 26 or older residing in rural settings.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Electronic health records (October 2019 to January 2021) for 36,762 patients across 6 primary care clinics involved in a large feasibility trial in US rural communities were analyzed. All clinics implemented a standardized intervention. Mixed effects logistic/linear regression estimated the odds of OUD diagnosis among all patients, and, among those with OUD, the odds of receiving MOUD and days prescribed MOUD during the 15-month study period, comparing age categories (TAY aged 18-25 years vs adults 26 years or older). Covariates included gender, race, ethnicity, mental health comorbidities, and insurance status.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>OUD prevalence was 2.82% among TAY (n = 3,122) and 3.24% among adults aged 26 or older (n = 33,208). After adjusting for covariates and clustering, TAY had significantly lower odds of OUD diagnosis compared to adults 26 years or older (odds ratio = 0.58, 95% CI 0.45-0.73). There were no significant differences in MOUD receipt between age groups. Compared to adults aged 26 or older, TAY with OUD had significantly fewer MOUD days during the study, −43.81 days (−76.85 to −10.77).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Although no differences were observed in MOUD prescription receipt between TAY and adults aged 26 or older, TAY with OUD had fewer total days prescribed MOUD, indicating lower retention. Further research generalizable to rural communities is needed to assess retention among rural TAY with OUD.</div></div><div><h3>Plain language summary</h3><div>This study used data from the electronic health records of 6 rural primary care clinics across three states to compare the diagnostic rates of opioid use disorder (OUD) and the prescription of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) between 3,122 transition age youths (aged 18-25) and 33,208 adults aged 26 or older. The study found that the rates of OUD were lower in youths under age 25 compared to adults 26 or older. However, among participants diagnosed with OUD, youths under age 25 received 43 to 63 fewer days of prescribed MOUD compared to adults 26 years or older. These findings indicate possible inconsistencies in care such as lower retention or lower adherence affecting transition age youths compared to adults 26 or older. These findings highlight the need for age-appropriate interventions to improve treatment among youths with opioid use disorder in rural settings.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical trial registration information</h3><div>Rural MOUD Telemedicine in Primary Care Phase 1 (Feasibility); <span><span>https://clinicaltrials.gov/</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>; NCT04418453.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73525,"journal":{"name":"JAACAP open","volume":"2 4","pages":"Pages 231-238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11650659/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAACAP open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949732924000152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Transition age youth (TAY), aged 18 to 25 years, face barriers to medication treatment for opioid use disorder (MOUD), resulting in lower retention. We evaluated OUD prevalence and MOUD receipt comparing TAY to adults aged 26 or older residing in rural settings.

Method

Electronic health records (October 2019 to January 2021) for 36,762 patients across 6 primary care clinics involved in a large feasibility trial in US rural communities were analyzed. All clinics implemented a standardized intervention. Mixed effects logistic/linear regression estimated the odds of OUD diagnosis among all patients, and, among those with OUD, the odds of receiving MOUD and days prescribed MOUD during the 15-month study period, comparing age categories (TAY aged 18-25 years vs adults 26 years or older). Covariates included gender, race, ethnicity, mental health comorbidities, and insurance status.

Results

OUD prevalence was 2.82% among TAY (n = 3,122) and 3.24% among adults aged 26 or older (n = 33,208). After adjusting for covariates and clustering, TAY had significantly lower odds of OUD diagnosis compared to adults 26 years or older (odds ratio = 0.58, 95% CI 0.45-0.73). There were no significant differences in MOUD receipt between age groups. Compared to adults aged 26 or older, TAY with OUD had significantly fewer MOUD days during the study, −43.81 days (−76.85 to −10.77).

Conclusion

Although no differences were observed in MOUD prescription receipt between TAY and adults aged 26 or older, TAY with OUD had fewer total days prescribed MOUD, indicating lower retention. Further research generalizable to rural communities is needed to assess retention among rural TAY with OUD.

Plain language summary

This study used data from the electronic health records of 6 rural primary care clinics across three states to compare the diagnostic rates of opioid use disorder (OUD) and the prescription of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) between 3,122 transition age youths (aged 18-25) and 33,208 adults aged 26 or older. The study found that the rates of OUD were lower in youths under age 25 compared to adults 26 or older. However, among participants diagnosed with OUD, youths under age 25 received 43 to 63 fewer days of prescribed MOUD compared to adults 26 years or older. These findings indicate possible inconsistencies in care such as lower retention or lower adherence affecting transition age youths compared to adults 26 or older. These findings highlight the need for age-appropriate interventions to improve treatment among youths with opioid use disorder in rural settings.

Clinical trial registration information

Rural MOUD Telemedicine in Primary Care Phase 1 (Feasibility); https://clinicaltrials.gov/; NCT04418453.
与农村地区26岁或以上的成年人相比,过渡年龄青年阿片类药物使用障碍的药物治疗
目的:过渡年龄青年(TAY),年龄在18 ~ 25岁之间,面临阿片类药物使用障碍(mod)的药物治疗障碍,导致保留率较低。我们比较了居住在农村地区的26岁或以上的TAY成年人的OUD患病率和mod接收情况。方法:分析参与美国农村社区大型可行性试验的6家初级保健诊所36,762名患者的电子健康记录(2019年10月至2021年1月)。所有诊所都实施了标准化的干预措施。混合效应logistic/线性回归估计了所有患者中OUD诊断的几率,并且在15个月的研究期间,在患有OUD的患者中,接受mod的几率和处方mod的天数,比较了年龄类别(18-25岁的TAY与26岁或以上的成年人)。协变量包括性别、种族、民族、精神健康合并症和保险状况。结果:TAY人群患病率为2.82% (n = 3122), 26岁及以上人群患病率为3.24% (n = 33208)。在调整协变量和聚类后,与26岁或以上的成年人相比,TAY诊断OUD的几率显著降低(优势比= 0.58,95% CI 0.45-0.73)。不同年龄组间的mod接收量无显著差异。与26岁及以上的成年人相比,患有OUD的TAY在研究期间的mod天数明显减少,为-43.81天(-76.85至-10.77)。结论:尽管TAY和26岁及以上的成年人在服用mod处方方面没有差异,但患有OUD的TAY服用mod的总天数更少,表明保留时间更低。需要进一步的研究,以推广到农村社区,以评估农村TAY与OUD的保留。临床试验注册信息:农村模式远程医疗在初级保健阶段1(可行性);https://clinicaltrials.gov/;NCT04418453。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAACAP open
JAACAP open Psychiatry and Mental Health
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信