People with dementia disclosing their diagnosis to social networks: A systematic review and meta-synthesis.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY
Gianna Kohl, Mauricio Molinari Ulate, Jem Bhatt, Jennifer Lynch, Katrina Scior, Georgina Charlesworth
{"title":"People with dementia disclosing their diagnosis to social networks: A systematic review and meta-synthesis.","authors":"Gianna Kohl, Mauricio Molinari Ulate, Jem Bhatt, Jennifer Lynch, Katrina Scior, Georgina Charlesworth","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnae186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Given the stigma of dementia, individuals with the condition may be wary to disclose their diagnosis to other people, both in face-to-face and digital settings. While sharing one's dementia diagnosis with others is essential for accessing valuable support for social, cognitive, and physical well-being, this area of research has largely been neglected. In this meta-synthesis, we aimed to systematically review qualitative research on the factors associated with online and offline self-disclosure in people with dementia.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search in six electronic databases. Inclusion criteria comprised qualitative and mixed-methods studies describing experiences with self-disclosure in people with any type of dementia. Quality of the included studies was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. The meta-synthesis was conducted in NVivo using a thematic synthesis approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight studies were included. Three analytical themes were generated: 'Concealment', 'Stigma and fear', and 'Taking control', the latter two with subthemes. Findings from this review were corroborated with people with dementia and family carers as part of Patient and Public Involvement meetings. Our findings reveal that while stigma plays a pivotal role, people with dementia can take control of the meaning of their diagnosis through self-disclosure.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Self-disclosure is complex and multifaceted. People with dementia, particularly those experiencing stigma, can benefit from post-diagnostic support that encompasses resources and interventions for self-disclosure. Further research is required to investigate people with dementia's disclosure decision-making process.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnae186","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Given the stigma of dementia, individuals with the condition may be wary to disclose their diagnosis to other people, both in face-to-face and digital settings. While sharing one's dementia diagnosis with others is essential for accessing valuable support for social, cognitive, and physical well-being, this area of research has largely been neglected. In this meta-synthesis, we aimed to systematically review qualitative research on the factors associated with online and offline self-disclosure in people with dementia.

Research design and methods: We conducted a systematic search in six electronic databases. Inclusion criteria comprised qualitative and mixed-methods studies describing experiences with self-disclosure in people with any type of dementia. Quality of the included studies was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. The meta-synthesis was conducted in NVivo using a thematic synthesis approach.

Results: Twenty-eight studies were included. Three analytical themes were generated: 'Concealment', 'Stigma and fear', and 'Taking control', the latter two with subthemes. Findings from this review were corroborated with people with dementia and family carers as part of Patient and Public Involvement meetings. Our findings reveal that while stigma plays a pivotal role, people with dementia can take control of the meaning of their diagnosis through self-disclosure.

Discussion and implications: Self-disclosure is complex and multifaceted. People with dementia, particularly those experiencing stigma, can benefit from post-diagnostic support that encompasses resources and interventions for self-disclosure. Further research is required to investigate people with dementia's disclosure decision-making process.

痴呆症患者向社交网络披露他们的诊断:一个系统的回顾和综合。
背景和目的:考虑到痴呆症的耻辱,患有这种疾病的人可能会谨慎地向其他人透露他们的诊断,无论是在面对面还是在数字环境中。虽然与他人分享痴呆症诊断对于获得社会、认知和身体健康方面的宝贵支持至关重要,但这一研究领域在很大程度上被忽视了。在这一荟萃综合中,我们旨在系统地回顾痴呆症患者在线和离线自我表露相关因素的定性研究。研究设计与方法:对6个电子数据库进行了系统检索。纳入标准包括定性和混合方法研究,描述任何类型痴呆患者的自我表露经历。使用混合方法评估工具评估纳入研究的质量。综合研究采用主题综合方法在非体内进行。结果:纳入28项研究。产生了三个分析主题:“隐瞒”、“耻辱与恐惧”和“控制”,后两个主题还有副主题。作为患者和公众参与会议的一部分,这一综述的发现得到了痴呆症患者和家庭护理人员的证实。我们的研究结果表明,虽然耻辱感起着关键作用,但痴呆症患者可以通过自我表露来控制诊断的意义。讨论与启示:自我表露是复杂的、多方面的。痴呆症患者,特别是那些遭受耻辱的人,可以从诊断后支持中受益,包括自我披露的资源和干预措施。需要进一步的研究来调查痴呆症患者的信息披露决策过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gerontologist
Gerontologist GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信