Exploring how first- and third-person narrative modulates neural activation during a social cognition task. An event-related potentials (ERPs) study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Social Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1080/17470919.2024.2441524
Daniela Altavilla, Ines Adornetti, Valentina Deriu, Alessandra Chiera, Francesco Ferretti
{"title":"Exploring how first- and third-person narrative modulates neural activation during a social cognition task. An event-related potentials (ERPs) study.","authors":"Daniela Altavilla, Ines Adornetti, Valentina Deriu, Alessandra Chiera, Francesco Ferretti","doi":"10.1080/17470919.2024.2441524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Several studies showed a positive effect of stories on Theory of Mind (ToM) performance. The aim of the present exploratory study was to investigate whether and how a specific aspect of narrative, i.e., character perspective, modulates the brain activation in response to a ToM task and improve the accuracy. Fifty participants were divided in three groups based on the text assigned: first-person perspective group (1 G; <i>n</i> = 16), third-person perspective group (3 G; <i>n</i> = 18) and a scientific essay group (EG; <i>n</i> = 16). The electroencephalographic and behavioral responses to eyes expressions, taken from the \"Reading the Mind in the Eyes\" test, were recorded pre-(T0) and post-(T1) reading task. The main results showed a greater N100 on left fronto-central electrodes and a greater P220-400 on right temporo-parietal electrodes in response to eye expressions at T1 compared to T0 in 3 G. A lower N220-400 was found on right fronto-central in response to eye expressions at T1 compared to T0 in 1 G and 3 G. The results suggest that, although reading first- and third-person stories modulates self-processes in a similar way, third-person stories involve an early stage of processing and a more extended neural network including anterior-posterior brain sites.</p>","PeriodicalId":49511,"journal":{"name":"Social Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"307-325"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2024.2441524","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several studies showed a positive effect of stories on Theory of Mind (ToM) performance. The aim of the present exploratory study was to investigate whether and how a specific aspect of narrative, i.e., character perspective, modulates the brain activation in response to a ToM task and improve the accuracy. Fifty participants were divided in three groups based on the text assigned: first-person perspective group (1 G; n = 16), third-person perspective group (3 G; n = 18) and a scientific essay group (EG; n = 16). The electroencephalographic and behavioral responses to eyes expressions, taken from the "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" test, were recorded pre-(T0) and post-(T1) reading task. The main results showed a greater N100 on left fronto-central electrodes and a greater P220-400 on right temporo-parietal electrodes in response to eye expressions at T1 compared to T0 in 3 G. A lower N220-400 was found on right fronto-central in response to eye expressions at T1 compared to T0 in 1 G and 3 G. The results suggest that, although reading first- and third-person stories modulates self-processes in a similar way, third-person stories involve an early stage of processing and a more extended neural network including anterior-posterior brain sites.

探索第一和第三人称叙述如何调节社会认知任务中的神经激活。事件相关电位(ERPs)研究。
一些研究表明,故事对心理理论(ToM)的表现有积极的影响。本研究旨在探讨叙事的特定方面,即人物视角,是否以及如何调节大脑对ToM任务的反应并提高准确性。50名参与者根据所分配的文本分为三组:第一人称视角组(1g;n = 16),第三人称视角组(3g;n = 18)和科学论文组(EG;n = 16)。在阅读前(T0)和阅读后(T1)分别记录了阅读前(T0)和阅读后(T1)对眼睛表情的脑电图和行为反应。主要结果显示,T1时与3g时相比,左侧额中央电极的N100和右侧颞顶叶电极的P220-400均有较大的变化。T1和3g时,与T0相比,T1时眼球表情反应的右侧额中央N220-400较低。结果表明,虽然阅读第一人称故事和第三人称故事以类似的方式调节自我过程,但第三人称故事涉及到处理的早期阶段和一个更广泛的神经网络,包括大脑的前后部位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Neuroscience
Social Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Social Neuroscience features original empirical Research Papers as well as targeted Reviews, Commentaries and Fast Track Brief Reports that examine how the brain mediates social behavior, social cognition, social interactions and relationships, group social dynamics, and related topics that deal with social/interpersonal psychology and neurobiology. Multi-paper symposia and special topic issues are organized and presented regularly as well. The goal of Social Neuroscience is to provide a place to publish empirical articles that intend to further our understanding of the neural mechanisms contributing to the development and maintenance of social behaviors, or to understanding how these mechanisms are disrupted in clinical disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信