Incidence and risk factors for complications following cervical epidural steroid injections.

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Harsh Wadhwa, Matthew Rohde, Jayme C B Koltsov, Akaila Cabell, Matthew Smuck, Serena S Hu, John P Kleimeyer
{"title":"Incidence and risk factors for complications following cervical epidural steroid injections.","authors":"Harsh Wadhwa, Matthew Rohde, Jayme C B Koltsov, Akaila Cabell, Matthew Smuck, Serena S Hu, John P Kleimeyer","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Cervical epidural steroid injections (CESIs) are commonly used in management of cervical pathology. While severe complications have been reported, they are rare, and thus their incidence and risk factors have not been well characterized.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the incidence of complications 7, 30, and 90 days after CESI and to identify associated risk factors.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study of a large, national administrative claims database (Meritive<sup>TM</sup> Marketscan®).</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>The study included 229,412 patients (mean age 52.2 ± 11.3 years, 57.1% female) undergoing 448,209 CESIs from 2008-2015.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Complication rates following CESI, and risk factors for complication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults undergoing a CESI with active enrollment for one year prior to and 90 days after CESI were included. Patients with neoplasm, fracture, infection, inflammatory spondyloarthropathy or prior cervical surgery within one year preceding CESI were excluded. Multivariable repeated measures logistic regression models were used to identify risk factors for complications at 7, 30, and 90 days. Complications were stratified into procedural and medical complications. Each time point was modeled separately with Bonferroni adjustment for the multiple time points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Complications increased from 1.7% to 4.1%, to 8.0% within 7, 30, and 90 days, respectively. Procedural complications occurred in 0.6% of cases within 7 days, with neurologic complications occurring in 0.5% of cases. Medical complications occurred in 1.1%, 3.6%, and 7.2% within 7, 30 and 90 days, respectively. After multivariable risk adjustment, a transforaminal approach was associated with greater odd for procedural complications within 7 days relative to an interlaminar approach (p<0.001), with an odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.55 (1.35, 1.77). The transforaminal approach also was associated with greater odds of neurologic complications at 7 days [1.69 (1.45, 1.95); p<0.001]. A myelopathy diagnosis was not associated with risk of overall, procedural, medical, or neurological complications. The most influential factors independently associated with greater odds of any complication within 30 days included anticoagulant prescription [5.40 (4.55, 6.41); p<0.001] and history of venous thromboembolism [3.01 (2.40, 3.77); p<0.001]. The factors most strongly associated with procedural complications at 7 days included history of neurologic deficit [3.04 (2.65, 3.50); p<0.001] and antiplatelet medication prescription [2.21 (1.49, 3.27); p=0.003].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Complications following CESIs are infrequent. Neurologic complications were most common among procedural complications at 0.5% at 7 days. The transforaminal approach was associated with higher procedural complication rate compared to the interlaminar approach. Procedural and neurological complications were also associated with multiple factors including obesity, existing neurologic deficit, anxiety, and antiplatelet medication prescription. Attention should be given to these factors to mitigate procedural complications.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 2: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.12.003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background context: Cervical epidural steroid injections (CESIs) are commonly used in management of cervical pathology. While severe complications have been reported, they are rare, and thus their incidence and risk factors have not been well characterized.

Purpose: To determine the incidence of complications 7, 30, and 90 days after CESI and to identify associated risk factors.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study of a large, national administrative claims database (MeritiveTM Marketscan®).

Patient sample: The study included 229,412 patients (mean age 52.2 ± 11.3 years, 57.1% female) undergoing 448,209 CESIs from 2008-2015.

Outcome measures: Complication rates following CESI, and risk factors for complication.

Methods: Adults undergoing a CESI with active enrollment for one year prior to and 90 days after CESI were included. Patients with neoplasm, fracture, infection, inflammatory spondyloarthropathy or prior cervical surgery within one year preceding CESI were excluded. Multivariable repeated measures logistic regression models were used to identify risk factors for complications at 7, 30, and 90 days. Complications were stratified into procedural and medical complications. Each time point was modeled separately with Bonferroni adjustment for the multiple time points.

Results: Complications increased from 1.7% to 4.1%, to 8.0% within 7, 30, and 90 days, respectively. Procedural complications occurred in 0.6% of cases within 7 days, with neurologic complications occurring in 0.5% of cases. Medical complications occurred in 1.1%, 3.6%, and 7.2% within 7, 30 and 90 days, respectively. After multivariable risk adjustment, a transforaminal approach was associated with greater odd for procedural complications within 7 days relative to an interlaminar approach (p<0.001), with an odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.55 (1.35, 1.77). The transforaminal approach also was associated with greater odds of neurologic complications at 7 days [1.69 (1.45, 1.95); p<0.001]. A myelopathy diagnosis was not associated with risk of overall, procedural, medical, or neurological complications. The most influential factors independently associated with greater odds of any complication within 30 days included anticoagulant prescription [5.40 (4.55, 6.41); p<0.001] and history of venous thromboembolism [3.01 (2.40, 3.77); p<0.001]. The factors most strongly associated with procedural complications at 7 days included history of neurologic deficit [3.04 (2.65, 3.50); p<0.001] and antiplatelet medication prescription [2.21 (1.49, 3.27); p=0.003].

Conclusions: Complications following CESIs are infrequent. Neurologic complications were most common among procedural complications at 0.5% at 7 days. The transforaminal approach was associated with higher procedural complication rate compared to the interlaminar approach. Procedural and neurological complications were also associated with multiple factors including obesity, existing neurologic deficit, anxiety, and antiplatelet medication prescription. Attention should be given to these factors to mitigate procedural complications.

Level of evidence: 2:

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信