{"title":"Understanding the implication of task conditions on asymmetry in gait of post-stroke individuals using an Integrated Wearable System.","authors":"Shashi Ranjan, Priya Darji, Shraddha J Diwan, Uttama Lahiri","doi":"10.1007/s11517-024-03249-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hemiplegic individuals often demonstrate gait abnormality causing asymmetry in lower-limb muscle activation-related (implicit) and gait-related (explicit) measures (offering complementary information on one's gait) while walking. Added to hemiplegia, such asymmetry can be aggravated while walking under varying task conditions, namely, walking without speaking (single task), walking while counting backwards (dual task), and walking while holding an object and counting backwards (multiple task). This emphasizes the need to quantify the extent of aggravated implication of multiple-task and dual-task on gait asymmetry compared to single task. Here, we used Integrated Wearable System and carried out a study with a group of age-matched hemiplegic (Grp_S) and healthy (Grp_H) individuals to understand the potential of our system in quantifying asymmetry in explicit and implicit measures of gait, implication of hemiplegic condition and varying task conditions on these asymmetry measures along with their clinical relevance. Results showed the potential of our system in quantifying asymmetry in both explicit and implicit measures of gait, and these measures were statistically higher (p-value < 0.05) in Grp_S than Grp_H irrespective of the task conditions. Also, for Grp_S, these asymmetry measures became more pronounced as task demand increased, and again, these measures have shown a correlation with their risk of fall specifically during more attention-demanding tasks that could be clinically relevant.</p>","PeriodicalId":49840,"journal":{"name":"Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-024-03249-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Hemiplegic individuals often demonstrate gait abnormality causing asymmetry in lower-limb muscle activation-related (implicit) and gait-related (explicit) measures (offering complementary information on one's gait) while walking. Added to hemiplegia, such asymmetry can be aggravated while walking under varying task conditions, namely, walking without speaking (single task), walking while counting backwards (dual task), and walking while holding an object and counting backwards (multiple task). This emphasizes the need to quantify the extent of aggravated implication of multiple-task and dual-task on gait asymmetry compared to single task. Here, we used Integrated Wearable System and carried out a study with a group of age-matched hemiplegic (Grp_S) and healthy (Grp_H) individuals to understand the potential of our system in quantifying asymmetry in explicit and implicit measures of gait, implication of hemiplegic condition and varying task conditions on these asymmetry measures along with their clinical relevance. Results showed the potential of our system in quantifying asymmetry in both explicit and implicit measures of gait, and these measures were statistically higher (p-value < 0.05) in Grp_S than Grp_H irrespective of the task conditions. Also, for Grp_S, these asymmetry measures became more pronounced as task demand increased, and again, these measures have shown a correlation with their risk of fall specifically during more attention-demanding tasks that could be clinically relevant.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1963, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing (MBEC) continues to serve the biomedical engineering community, covering the entire spectrum of biomedical and clinical engineering. The journal presents exciting and vital experimental and theoretical developments in biomedical science and technology, and reports on advances in computer-based methodologies in these multidisciplinary subjects. The journal also incorporates new and evolving technologies including cellular engineering and molecular imaging.
MBEC publishes original research articles as well as reviews and technical notes. Its Rapid Communications category focuses on material of immediate value to the readership, while the Controversies section provides a forum to exchange views on selected issues, stimulating a vigorous and informed debate in this exciting and high profile field.
MBEC is an official journal of the International Federation of Medical and Biological Engineering (IFMBE).