Adherence to national trauma triage criteria in Norway: a cross-sectional study.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Einar Frigstad Hoås, Waleed Mohammed Majeed, Olav Røise, Oddvar Uleberg
{"title":"Adherence to national trauma triage criteria in Norway: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Einar Frigstad Hoås, Waleed Mohammed Majeed, Olav Røise, Oddvar Uleberg","doi":"10.1186/s13049-024-01306-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Norwegian hospitals employed individual trauma triage criteria until 2015 when nationwide criteria were implemented. There is a lack of empirical evidence regarding adherence to Norwegian national criteria for activation of the trauma team (NTrC) and the decision-making processes regarding trauma team activation (TTA) within Norwegian trauma hospitals. The objectives of this study were to investigate institutional adherence to the NTrC and to investigate similarities and differences in the decision-making process leading to TTA in Norwegian trauma hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A digital semi-structured questionnaire regarding adherence to criteria, TTA decision-making and criteria documentation was distributed to all Norwegian trauma hospitals (n = 38) in the spring of 2022. Contact details of trauma coordinators and registrars were provided by the Norwegian Trauma Registry secretariat. Follow-up telephone interviews were conducted at the investigator's discretion in cases of non-respondents or need to clarify answers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-eight trauma hospitals were invited to answer the survey, where 35 hospitals responded (92%), making 35 the denominator of the results. Thirty-four (97.1%) hospitals stated that they followed NTrC. Thirty-three (94.3%) of the responding hospitals provided documentation of their criteria in use, of which twenty-eight (80%) of responding hospitals adhered to the NTrC. Three (8.6%) hospitals employed a tiered TTA approach with different sized teams. In addition four hospitals (11.4%) used specialized teams to meet the needs of defined patient groups (e.g. geriatric patients, traumatic brain injury). Twenty-one (60%) of the responding hospitals had written guidelines on who could perform TTA and in 18 hospitals (51.4%) TTA could be performed by pre-hospital personnel. Twenty-three (65.7%) of the hospitals documented which criteria that were used for TTA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is good adherence to the national criteria for activation of the trauma team among Norwegian trauma hospitals after implementation of national guidelines. Individual hospitals argue the use of certain local criteria and trauma team activation decision-making processes to increase their precision in specific patient populations and demographics. Further steps should be done to reduce the variation in TTA decision-making processes among hospitals and improve documentation quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":49292,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","volume":"32 1","pages":"133"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11656868/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-024-01306-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Norwegian hospitals employed individual trauma triage criteria until 2015 when nationwide criteria were implemented. There is a lack of empirical evidence regarding adherence to Norwegian national criteria for activation of the trauma team (NTrC) and the decision-making processes regarding trauma team activation (TTA) within Norwegian trauma hospitals. The objectives of this study were to investigate institutional adherence to the NTrC and to investigate similarities and differences in the decision-making process leading to TTA in Norwegian trauma hospitals.

Methods: A digital semi-structured questionnaire regarding adherence to criteria, TTA decision-making and criteria documentation was distributed to all Norwegian trauma hospitals (n = 38) in the spring of 2022. Contact details of trauma coordinators and registrars were provided by the Norwegian Trauma Registry secretariat. Follow-up telephone interviews were conducted at the investigator's discretion in cases of non-respondents or need to clarify answers.

Results: Thirty-eight trauma hospitals were invited to answer the survey, where 35 hospitals responded (92%), making 35 the denominator of the results. Thirty-four (97.1%) hospitals stated that they followed NTrC. Thirty-three (94.3%) of the responding hospitals provided documentation of their criteria in use, of which twenty-eight (80%) of responding hospitals adhered to the NTrC. Three (8.6%) hospitals employed a tiered TTA approach with different sized teams. In addition four hospitals (11.4%) used specialized teams to meet the needs of defined patient groups (e.g. geriatric patients, traumatic brain injury). Twenty-one (60%) of the responding hospitals had written guidelines on who could perform TTA and in 18 hospitals (51.4%) TTA could be performed by pre-hospital personnel. Twenty-three (65.7%) of the hospitals documented which criteria that were used for TTA.

Conclusion: There is good adherence to the national criteria for activation of the trauma team among Norwegian trauma hospitals after implementation of national guidelines. Individual hospitals argue the use of certain local criteria and trauma team activation decision-making processes to increase their precision in specific patient populations and demographics. Further steps should be done to reduce the variation in TTA decision-making processes among hospitals and improve documentation quality.

挪威对国家创伤分诊标准的遵守:一项横断面研究。
背景:挪威医院采用个体创伤分诊标准,直到2015年实施全国标准。在挪威创伤医院内,缺乏关于遵守挪威国家标准启动创伤小组(NTrC)和关于启动创伤小组(TTA)的决策过程的经验证据。本研究的目的是调查机构对NTrC的遵守情况,并调查在挪威创伤医院导致TTA的决策过程中的异同。方法:于2022年春季向挪威所有创伤医院(n = 38)分发了一份关于遵守标准、TTA决策和标准文件的数字半结构化问卷。创伤协调员和登记员的联系方式由挪威创伤登记处秘书处提供。如果没有应答者或需要澄清答案,研究者自行决定进行后续电话访谈。结果:共邀请38家创伤医院参与调查,其中35家医院回复,占92%,35为结果的分母。34家(97.1%)医院表示他们遵循了NTrC。33家(94.3%)答复医院提供了其使用标准的文件,其中28家(80%)答复医院遵守NTrC。三家(8.6%)医院采用不同规模团队的分层TTA方法。此外,有四家医院(11.4%)利用专门小组来满足特定患者群体(如老年患者、创伤性脑损伤)的需求。21家(60%)应答医院有书面指导谁可以执行TTA, 18家(51.4%)医院可以由院前人员执行TTA。23家(65.7%)医院记录了TTA使用的标准。结论:在实施国家指南后,挪威创伤医院对激活创伤小组的国家标准有很好的遵守。个别医院主张使用特定的当地标准和创伤团队激活决策过程,以提高其对特定患者群体和人口统计数据的准确性。应采取进一步措施,减少各医院之间在TTA决策过程中的差异,并提高文件质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The primary topics of interest in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine (SJTREM) are the pre-hospital and early in-hospital diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of emergency medicine, trauma, and resuscitation. Contributions focusing on dispatch, major incidents, etiology, pathophysiology, rehabilitation, epidemiology, prevention, education, training, implementation, work environment, as well as ethical and socio-economic aspects may also be assessed for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信