Radiation Myelitis Risk After Hypofractionated Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.

IF 28.4 1区 医学 Q1 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Christopher B Jackson, Lillian A Boe, Lei Zhang, Aditya Apte, Lisa M Ruppert, Justin M Haseltine, Boris A Mueller, Adam M Schmitt, Jonathan T Yang, W Christopher Newman, Ori Barzilai, Mark H Bilsky, Yoshiya Yamada, Andrew Jackson, Eric Lis, Daniel S Higginson
{"title":"Radiation Myelitis Risk After Hypofractionated Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.","authors":"Christopher B Jackson, Lillian A Boe, Lei Zhang, Aditya Apte, Lisa M Ruppert, Justin M Haseltine, Boris A Mueller, Adam M Schmitt, Jonathan T Yang, W Christopher Newman, Ori Barzilai, Mark H Bilsky, Yoshiya Yamada, Andrew Jackson, Eric Lis, Daniel S Higginson","doi":"10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.5387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for spinal metastases improves symptomatic outcomes and local control compared to conventional radiotherapy. Treatment failure most often occurs within the epidural space, where dose is constrained by the risk of radiation myelitis (RM). Current constraints designed to prevent RM after spine SBRT are derived from limited data.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize the risk of RM after spine SBRT and to update the dosimetric constraints for preventing it.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cohort study was conducted in a single tertiary cancer care center with patients treated for spinal metastases from 2014 to 2023. All included participants had undergone spine SBRT, had a minimum of 1-month follow-up with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), a maximal cord dose to a voxel (Dmax) greater than 0 Gy, and no overlapping prior radiotherapy. In all, 2051 patients received SBRT to 2835 spinal metastases (levels C1-L2) during the study period.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Three-fraction spine SBRT to a prescription dose of 27 to 36 Gy.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>RM defined as radiographic evidence of spinal cord injury in the treatment field, classified as grade (G) 1 to G4 or G3 to G4 per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Multiple dosimetric parameters of the true spinal cord structure were assessed for an association with risk of RM to determine the important covariates associated with this toxicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 1423 patients (mean [SD] age, 61.6 [12.9] years; 695 [48.8%] females and 728 [51.1%] males) who received SBRT for 1904 spinal metastases. Among them, 30 cases of RM were identified, 19 of which were classified as G3 to G4. Two years after SBRT, the rate of G1 to G4 RM was 1.8% (95% CI, 1.2%-2.5%) and the rate of G3 to G4 RM was 1.1% (95% CI, 0.7%-1.7%). The minimum dose to the 0.1 cm3 of spinal cord receiving the greatest dose (D0.1cc) was the most important covariate on univariable cause-specific hazards regression for RM (for G3 to G4: hazard ratio, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.68-2.72; P < .001). A true cord D0.1cc of 19.1 Gy and Dmax of 20.8 Gy estimated a 1.0% risk (95% CI, 0.3%-1.6% and 0.4%-1.6%, respectively) of G3 to G4 RM 2 years after SBRT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The findings of this cohort study indicate that a cord (myelogram or MRI-derived) D0.1cc constraint of 19.1 Gy and a Dmax constraint of 20.8 Gy correspond with a 1.0% risk of G3 to G4 RM at 2 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":48661,"journal":{"name":"Jama Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":28.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jama Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.5387","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for spinal metastases improves symptomatic outcomes and local control compared to conventional radiotherapy. Treatment failure most often occurs within the epidural space, where dose is constrained by the risk of radiation myelitis (RM). Current constraints designed to prevent RM after spine SBRT are derived from limited data.

Objective: To characterize the risk of RM after spine SBRT and to update the dosimetric constraints for preventing it.

Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study was conducted in a single tertiary cancer care center with patients treated for spinal metastases from 2014 to 2023. All included participants had undergone spine SBRT, had a minimum of 1-month follow-up with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), a maximal cord dose to a voxel (Dmax) greater than 0 Gy, and no overlapping prior radiotherapy. In all, 2051 patients received SBRT to 2835 spinal metastases (levels C1-L2) during the study period.

Exposures: Three-fraction spine SBRT to a prescription dose of 27 to 36 Gy.

Main outcomes and measures: RM defined as radiographic evidence of spinal cord injury in the treatment field, classified as grade (G) 1 to G4 or G3 to G4 per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Multiple dosimetric parameters of the true spinal cord structure were assessed for an association with risk of RM to determine the important covariates associated with this toxicity.

Results: The analysis included 1423 patients (mean [SD] age, 61.6 [12.9] years; 695 [48.8%] females and 728 [51.1%] males) who received SBRT for 1904 spinal metastases. Among them, 30 cases of RM were identified, 19 of which were classified as G3 to G4. Two years after SBRT, the rate of G1 to G4 RM was 1.8% (95% CI, 1.2%-2.5%) and the rate of G3 to G4 RM was 1.1% (95% CI, 0.7%-1.7%). The minimum dose to the 0.1 cm3 of spinal cord receiving the greatest dose (D0.1cc) was the most important covariate on univariable cause-specific hazards regression for RM (for G3 to G4: hazard ratio, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.68-2.72; P < .001). A true cord D0.1cc of 19.1 Gy and Dmax of 20.8 Gy estimated a 1.0% risk (95% CI, 0.3%-1.6% and 0.4%-1.6%, respectively) of G3 to G4 RM 2 years after SBRT.

Conclusions and relevance: The findings of this cohort study indicate that a cord (myelogram or MRI-derived) D0.1cc constraint of 19.1 Gy and a Dmax constraint of 20.8 Gy correspond with a 1.0% risk of G3 to G4 RM at 2 years.

低分割脊柱立体定向放射治疗后放射性脊髓炎的风险。
重要性:与传统放射治疗相比,立体定向全身放射治疗(SBRT)可改善脊柱转移的症状结局和局部控制。治疗失败最常发生在硬膜外腔,那里的剂量受到放射性脊髓炎(RM)风险的限制。目前旨在防止脊柱SBRT后发生RM的限制来自有限的数据。目的:探讨脊柱SBRT术后发生RM的风险,并更新预防RM的剂量学限制。设计、环境和参与者:该队列研究于2014年至2023年在单一三级癌症护理中心进行,患者接受脊柱转移治疗。所有纳入的参与者都接受了脊柱SBRT,进行了至少1个月的磁共振成像(MRI)随访,最大脊髓剂量到体素(Dmax)大于0 Gy,并且没有重叠的先前放疗。在研究期间,共有2051例患者接受了SBRT治疗,其中2835例脊柱转移(C1-L2水平)。暴露:三组分脊柱SBRT,处方剂量为27至36 Gy。主要结局和指标:RM定义为治疗现场脊髓损伤的放射学证据,根据不良事件通用术语标准5.0,分为(G) 1至G4或G3至G4级。评估了真实脊髓结构的多个剂量学参数与RM风险的关联,以确定与该毒性相关的重要协变量。结果:纳入1423例患者(平均[SD]年龄61.6[12.9]岁;695例(48.8%)女性,728例(51.1%)男性)因1904例脊柱转移接受SBRT治疗。其中发现RM 30例,其中G3 ~ G4级19例。SBRT后2年,G1至G4 RM的发生率为1.8% (95% CI, 1.2%-2.5%), G3至G4 RM的发生率为1.1% (95% CI, 0.7%-1.7%)。在RM的单变量病因特异性风险回归中,接受最大剂量(D0.1cc)的0.1 cm3脊髓的最小剂量是最重要的协变量(G3至G4:风险比为2.14;95% ci, 1.68-2.72;结论和相关性:该队列研究的结果表明,脊髓(髓系图或mri衍生)D0.1cc限制19.1 Gy和Dmax限制20.8 Gy对应于2年G3至G4 RM 1.0%的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Jama Oncology
Jama Oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
37.50
自引率
1.80%
发文量
423
期刊介绍: At JAMA Oncology, our primary goal is to contribute to the advancement of oncology research and enhance patient care. As a leading journal in the field, we strive to publish influential original research, opinions, and reviews that push the boundaries of oncology science. Our mission is to serve as the definitive resource for scientists, clinicians, and trainees in oncology globally. Through our innovative and timely scientific and educational content, we aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of cancer pathogenesis and the latest treatment advancements to our readers. We are dedicated to effectively disseminating the findings of significant clinical research, major scientific breakthroughs, actionable discoveries, and state-of-the-art treatment pathways to the oncology community. Our ultimate objective is to facilitate the translation of new knowledge into tangible clinical benefits for individuals living with and surviving cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信