The IMproving treatment decisions for Patients with AortiC stenosis Through Shared Decision Making (IMPACT SDM) Study: study protocol for a cluster randomized stepped wedge trial.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Trials Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1186/s13063-024-08640-6
Karen Sepucha, Sammy Elmariah, K D Valentine, Matthew A Cavender, Yuchiao Chang, Chandan M Devireddy, Neal W Dickert, Kristy D Gama, Christopher E Knoepke, Ethan Korngold, Dharam J Kumbhani, Daniel D Matlock, John C Messenger, Susan Strong, Vinod H Thourani, Ashwin Nathan, Nishath Quader, Alexander A Brescia
{"title":"The IMproving treatment decisions for Patients with AortiC stenosis Through Shared Decision Making (IMPACT SDM) Study: study protocol for a cluster randomized stepped wedge trial.","authors":"Karen Sepucha, Sammy Elmariah, K D Valentine, Matthew A Cavender, Yuchiao Chang, Chandan M Devireddy, Neal W Dickert, Kristy D Gama, Christopher E Knoepke, Ethan Korngold, Dharam J Kumbhani, Daniel D Matlock, John C Messenger, Susan Strong, Vinod H Thourani, Ashwin Nathan, Nishath Quader, Alexander A Brescia","doi":"10.1186/s13063-024-08640-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services recommend shared decision-making (SDM) for patients with severe aortic stenosis choosing between transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Although tools such as patient decision aids (DAs) and training in SDM have been shown to improve SDM, implementation of SDM and DAs is limited. The IMproving treatment decisions for Patients with AortiC stenosis Through Shared Decision Making (IMPACT SDM) study aims to (1) determine the effectiveness of the interventions (a DA and clinician SDM training) in achieving SDM (primary outcome) and improving the quality of decisions about aortic valve replacement, (2) determine the reach of the DAs and adoption of training, and (3) explore potential mechanisms of effectiveness and implementation at the patient-, clinician-, and clinic-level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study is a hybrid type II effectiveness-implementation study using a cluster randomized batched stepped wedge trial with 8 sites across the USA. Eligible patients will be surveyed before and after visits with the heart valve team; clinicians will be surveyed after visits. Reach of DAs and adoption of training will be tracked. Clinicians will be interviewed regarding barriers and facilitators to implementation.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The IMPACT SDM Study seeks to provide evidence of the ability of the interventions to improve SDM and decision quality, and also to shed light on barriers and facilitators to SDM implementation to promote future implementation efforts.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06171737. Registered on December 15, 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"25 1","pages":"820"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11654330/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08640-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services recommend shared decision-making (SDM) for patients with severe aortic stenosis choosing between transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Although tools such as patient decision aids (DAs) and training in SDM have been shown to improve SDM, implementation of SDM and DAs is limited. The IMproving treatment decisions for Patients with AortiC stenosis Through Shared Decision Making (IMPACT SDM) study aims to (1) determine the effectiveness of the interventions (a DA and clinician SDM training) in achieving SDM (primary outcome) and improving the quality of decisions about aortic valve replacement, (2) determine the reach of the DAs and adoption of training, and (3) explore potential mechanisms of effectiveness and implementation at the patient-, clinician-, and clinic-level.

Methods: The study is a hybrid type II effectiveness-implementation study using a cluster randomized batched stepped wedge trial with 8 sites across the USA. Eligible patients will be surveyed before and after visits with the heart valve team; clinicians will be surveyed after visits. Reach of DAs and adoption of training will be tracked. Clinicians will be interviewed regarding barriers and facilitators to implementation.

Discussion: The IMPACT SDM Study seeks to provide evidence of the ability of the interventions to improve SDM and decision quality, and also to shed light on barriers and facilitators to SDM implementation to promote future implementation efforts.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06171737. Registered on December 15, 2023.

通过共同决策改善主动脉瓣狭窄患者的治疗决策(IMPACT SDM)研究:聚类随机阶梯楔形试验的研究方案。
背景:美国心脏病学会、美国心脏协会、医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心建议严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者在经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)和手术主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)之间选择共同决策(SDM)。虽然诸如患者决策辅助(DAs)和SDM培训等工具已被证明可以改善SDM,但SDM和DAs的实施是有限的。通过共享决策改善主动脉瓣狭窄患者的治疗决策(IMPACT SDM)研究旨在(1)确定干预措施(DA和临床医生SDM培训)在实现SDM(主要结局)和提高主动脉瓣置换术决策质量方面的有效性,(2)确定DA的范围和培训的采用,以及(3)探索患者、临床医生和临床层面的有效性和实施的潜在机制。方法:该研究是一项混合型II型有效性实施研究,采用美国8个站点的随机分批阶梯形试验。符合条件的患者将在就诊前后接受心脏瓣膜团队的调查;临床医生将在访问后接受调查。将跟踪DAs的覆盖范围和培训的采用情况。临床医生将接受关于实施障碍和促进因素的访谈。讨论:IMPACT SDM研究旨在为干预措施改善SDM和决策质量的能力提供证据,并揭示SDM实施的障碍和促进因素,以促进未来的实施工作。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06171737。注册日期:2023年12月15日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信