Predicting response to bacillus Calmette-Guerin in high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Translational cancer research Pub Date : 2024-11-30 Epub Date: 2024-07-30 DOI:10.21037/tcr-24-180
Amir M Soltani-Tehrani, Aman Kumar, Kamal S Pohar
{"title":"Predicting response to bacillus Calmette-Guerin in high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.","authors":"Amir M Soltani-Tehrani, Aman Kumar, Kamal S Pohar","doi":"10.21037/tcr-24-180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bladder cancer is a commonly diagnosed cancer, especially in men, and 70% of new diagnoses are considered non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Bladder cancer is prone to high rates of recurrence, and this risk is greatest in high risk NMIBC. Intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) is standard of care for reducing rates of recurrence for high risk NMIBC. Despite its favorable efficacy a significant proportion of patients do not have durable prolonged response to BCG and some patients progress to muscle invasive bladder cancer worsening prognosis. Predictive tools are needed in clinical practice to identify patients who are not likely to respond to BCG and need alternative treatments. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and Club Urologico Espanol de Tratamiento Oncologico (CUETO) have proposed outcome prediction tables for NMIBC patients, providing risk stratification and recurrence and progression probability scores. While valuable in clinical practice, these tables have limitations and overestimate recurrence and progression for high risk NMIBC. Several efforts have attempted to refine our ability to better understand which patients derive the greatest benefit from BCG. T1 pathologic substaging, tumor budding, and artificial intelligence techniques studying pathologic features of the tumor and the microenvironment have been applied to high risk NMIBC as a means of identifying patients less likely to respond to BCG. Molecular markers, genomic alterations and transcriptomic signatures are promising and hold the potential to aid in forecasting tumor progression and response to therapy. However, their application is still in its initial phases and necessitates additional validation through further studies. This review describes both clinical and molecular risk factors that could prove beneficial in anticipating the response to BCG, with a particular focus on high-risk T1 bladder cancers.</p>","PeriodicalId":23216,"journal":{"name":"Translational cancer research","volume":"13 11","pages":"6489-6502"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11651738/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr-24-180","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bladder cancer is a commonly diagnosed cancer, especially in men, and 70% of new diagnoses are considered non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Bladder cancer is prone to high rates of recurrence, and this risk is greatest in high risk NMIBC. Intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) is standard of care for reducing rates of recurrence for high risk NMIBC. Despite its favorable efficacy a significant proportion of patients do not have durable prolonged response to BCG and some patients progress to muscle invasive bladder cancer worsening prognosis. Predictive tools are needed in clinical practice to identify patients who are not likely to respond to BCG and need alternative treatments. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and Club Urologico Espanol de Tratamiento Oncologico (CUETO) have proposed outcome prediction tables for NMIBC patients, providing risk stratification and recurrence and progression probability scores. While valuable in clinical practice, these tables have limitations and overestimate recurrence and progression for high risk NMIBC. Several efforts have attempted to refine our ability to better understand which patients derive the greatest benefit from BCG. T1 pathologic substaging, tumor budding, and artificial intelligence techniques studying pathologic features of the tumor and the microenvironment have been applied to high risk NMIBC as a means of identifying patients less likely to respond to BCG. Molecular markers, genomic alterations and transcriptomic signatures are promising and hold the potential to aid in forecasting tumor progression and response to therapy. However, their application is still in its initial phases and necessitates additional validation through further studies. This review describes both clinical and molecular risk factors that could prove beneficial in anticipating the response to BCG, with a particular focus on high-risk T1 bladder cancers.

预测卡介苗对高危非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌的疗效。
膀胱癌是一种常见的癌症,尤其是在男性中,70%的新诊断被认为是非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)。膀胱癌的复发率很高,在高危的NMIBC中复发率最高。膀胱内卡介苗(BCG)是降低高风险NMIBC复发率的标准治疗方法。尽管卡介苗疗效良好,但相当比例的患者对卡介苗没有持久的长期反应,一些患者进展为肌肉浸润性膀胱癌,预后恶化。在临床实践中需要预测工具来识别不太可能对卡介苗有反应并需要替代治疗的患者。欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)和西班牙泌尿肿瘤协会(CUETO)提出了NMIBC患者的预后预测表,提供了风险分层、复发和进展概率评分。虽然在临床实践中有价值,但这些表有局限性,并且高估了高风险NMIBC的复发和进展。一些努力试图完善我们的能力,以更好地了解哪些患者从卡介苗中获益最大。T1病理亚分期、肿瘤出芽以及研究肿瘤病理特征和微环境的人工智能技术已被应用于高风险NMIBC,作为识别不太可能对BCG产生反应的患者的手段。分子标记、基因组改变和转录组特征是有希望的,并且有潜力帮助预测肿瘤进展和对治疗的反应。然而,它们的应用仍处于初始阶段,需要通过进一步的研究来进一步验证。这篇综述描述了临床和分子危险因素,可以证明有利于预测BCG的反应,特别关注高危T1膀胱癌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
252
期刊介绍: Translational Cancer Research (Transl Cancer Res TCR; Print ISSN: 2218-676X; Online ISSN 2219-6803; http://tcr.amegroups.com/) is an Open Access, peer-reviewed journal, indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE). TCR publishes laboratory studies of novel therapeutic interventions as well as clinical trials which evaluate new treatment paradigms for cancer; results of novel research investigations which bridge the laboratory and clinical settings including risk assessment, cellular and molecular characterization, prevention, detection, diagnosis and treatment of human cancers with the overall goal of improving the clinical care of cancer patients. The focus of TCR is original, peer-reviewed, science-based research that successfully advances clinical medicine toward the goal of improving patients'' quality of life. The editors and an international advisory group of scientists and clinician-scientists as well as other experts will hold TCR articles to the high-quality standards. We accept Original Articles as well as Review Articles, Editorials and Brief Articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信