Lay health coaching intervention for older adults with chronic diseases: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Trials Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1186/s13063-024-08649-x
Edwin K H Chung, Eliza Lai-Yi Wong, Hera Hiu-Wah Leung, Dannii Y Yeung, Eng-Kiong Yeoh, Frank Youhua Chen
{"title":"Lay health coaching intervention for older adults with chronic diseases: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Edwin K H Chung, Eliza Lai-Yi Wong, Hera Hiu-Wah Leung, Dannii Y Yeung, Eng-Kiong Yeoh, Frank Youhua Chen","doi":"10.1186/s13063-024-08649-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A large proportion of older adults suffer from chronic diseases. Health coaching is a promising intervention that enhances individuals' health knowledge and supports changes in health behaviours. Even though health professionals usually conduct health coaching interventions, lay health workers from different backgrounds account for a growing segment of health coaches over the years. The planned study's main objective is to investigate whether health coaching by lay health workers is as effective as that by health professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The effects of health coaching intervention by lay health workers will be examined in comparison with that by health professionals within a single-blind, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial with a follow-up assessment after 3 months. A total of 380 community-dwelling older adults with chronic diseases will be recruited and randomly assigned using a 1:1 ratio into the intervention and control groups. The intervention group will receive a 3-month health coaching intervention delivered by lay health workers, whereas the control group will receive the intervention delivered by health professionals. Primary outcomes include patient activation, physical activity and nutrition behaviours.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The expected findings of this study will advance the health coaching literature, research and practice by determining whether health coaching by lay health workers is as effective as that by health professionals in enhancing older adults' knowledge, skills and confidence in chronic disease self-management and promoting changes in health behaviours. If proven effective, the inclusion of lay health workers in delivering effective self-management interventions should be advocated to reduce the over-reliance on health professionals in the primary healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ISRCTN, ISRCTN73836238 . Registered 8 November 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"25 1","pages":"817"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11653921/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08649-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A large proportion of older adults suffer from chronic diseases. Health coaching is a promising intervention that enhances individuals' health knowledge and supports changes in health behaviours. Even though health professionals usually conduct health coaching interventions, lay health workers from different backgrounds account for a growing segment of health coaches over the years. The planned study's main objective is to investigate whether health coaching by lay health workers is as effective as that by health professionals.

Methods: The effects of health coaching intervention by lay health workers will be examined in comparison with that by health professionals within a single-blind, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial with a follow-up assessment after 3 months. A total of 380 community-dwelling older adults with chronic diseases will be recruited and randomly assigned using a 1:1 ratio into the intervention and control groups. The intervention group will receive a 3-month health coaching intervention delivered by lay health workers, whereas the control group will receive the intervention delivered by health professionals. Primary outcomes include patient activation, physical activity and nutrition behaviours.

Discussion: The expected findings of this study will advance the health coaching literature, research and practice by determining whether health coaching by lay health workers is as effective as that by health professionals in enhancing older adults' knowledge, skills and confidence in chronic disease self-management and promoting changes in health behaviours. If proven effective, the inclusion of lay health workers in delivering effective self-management interventions should be advocated to reduce the over-reliance on health professionals in the primary healthcare system.

Trial registration: ISRCTN, ISRCTN73836238 . Registered 8 November 2023.

老年人慢性疾病的健康指导干预:一项实用随机对照试验的研究方案。
背景:很大一部分老年人患有慢性疾病。健康指导是一种很有前途的干预措施,可以增强个人的健康知识并支持改变健康行为。尽管卫生专业人员通常进行卫生指导干预,但多年来,来自不同背景的非专业卫生工作者在卫生教练中所占的比例越来越大。计划中的研究的主要目的是调查非专业卫生工作者的健康指导是否与卫生专业人员的健康指导同样有效。方法:通过一项单盲、多中心、随机对照试验,在3个月后进行随访评估,将非专业卫生工作者健康指导干预的效果与卫生专业人员进行比较。将招募380名居住在社区的慢性病老年人,按1:1的比例随机分为干预组和对照组。干预组将接受由非专业卫生工作者提供的为期3个月的健康指导干预,而对照组将接受由卫生专业人员提供的干预。主要结局包括患者活动、身体活动和营养行为。讨论:本研究的预期结果将通过确定非专业卫生工作者的健康指导是否与卫生专业人员的健康指导在增强老年人慢性病自我管理的知识、技能和信心以及促进健康行为改变方面同样有效,从而推进健康指导文献、研究和实践。如果证明有效,应提倡让非专业卫生工作者参与提供有效的自我管理干预措施,以减少初级卫生保健系统对卫生专业人员的过度依赖。试验注册:ISRCTN, ISRCTN73836238。2023年11月8日注册
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信