Return to Soccer After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Outcome or a Decision?

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-18 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1177/23259671241295834
Isabelle Hållén, Joanna Kvist, Magnus Forssblad, Alexander Sandon
{"title":"Return to Soccer After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Outcome or a Decision?","authors":"Isabelle Hållén, Joanna Kvist, Magnus Forssblad, Alexander Sandon","doi":"10.1177/23259671241295834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The return-to-sports rate is often used as an outcome measure after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). Although most soccer players want to return to sports after their ACL injury, up to 40% do not believe they will return to soccer after their ACL injury.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate whether self-reported presurgical beliefs regarding return to soccer correspond to registered official match participation after ACLR.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Included were soccer players with a primary unilateral ACL injury who were ≥15 years at the time of ACLR and who had completed a presurgical question about their future sports participation beliefs. ACLR surgical data were extracted from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry, and game participation data were extracted from the Swedish Football Association's administrative data system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 959 soccer players (617 [64%] male and 342 [36%] female) were included. The follow-up time after ACLR ranged from 18 months to 5.5 years. Of 720 soccer players (75%) who believed that they would return to play (RTP), 462 (64%) players actually did. Of the players who believed that they would not RTP, 181 (76%) did not. Presurgical beliefs predicted RTP (odds ratio [OR], 5.59; <i>P</i> < .001). Younger age at the time of ACLR favored RTP, where 61% of the players aged 15-20 years had RTP (OR, 3.85; <i>P</i> < .001). At the top competitive level, 84% of the players RTP compared to 14% at the recreational level. Players active at higher levels were more likely to believe that they would RTP, and they also actually did so (OR, 33.06; <i>P</i> < .001). Overall, 67% of players followed their presurgical intention to return to soccer.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings indicated that presurgical beliefs, age, and level of play helped to predict the actual RTP of soccer players after ACLR.</p>","PeriodicalId":19646,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"12 12","pages":"23259671241295834"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11653463/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241295834","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The return-to-sports rate is often used as an outcome measure after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). Although most soccer players want to return to sports after their ACL injury, up to 40% do not believe they will return to soccer after their ACL injury.

Purpose: To investigate whether self-reported presurgical beliefs regarding return to soccer correspond to registered official match participation after ACLR.

Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

Methods: Included were soccer players with a primary unilateral ACL injury who were ≥15 years at the time of ACLR and who had completed a presurgical question about their future sports participation beliefs. ACLR surgical data were extracted from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry, and game participation data were extracted from the Swedish Football Association's administrative data system.

Results: A total of 959 soccer players (617 [64%] male and 342 [36%] female) were included. The follow-up time after ACLR ranged from 18 months to 5.5 years. Of 720 soccer players (75%) who believed that they would return to play (RTP), 462 (64%) players actually did. Of the players who believed that they would not RTP, 181 (76%) did not. Presurgical beliefs predicted RTP (odds ratio [OR], 5.59; P < .001). Younger age at the time of ACLR favored RTP, where 61% of the players aged 15-20 years had RTP (OR, 3.85; P < .001). At the top competitive level, 84% of the players RTP compared to 14% at the recreational level. Players active at higher levels were more likely to believe that they would RTP, and they also actually did so (OR, 33.06; P < .001). Overall, 67% of players followed their presurgical intention to return to soccer.

Conclusion: The findings indicated that presurgical beliefs, age, and level of play helped to predict the actual RTP of soccer players after ACLR.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
876
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), developed by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), is a global, peer-reviewed, open access journal that combines the interests of researchers and clinical practitioners across orthopaedic sports medicine, arthroscopy, and knee arthroplasty. Topics include original research in the areas of: -Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, including surgical and nonsurgical treatment of orthopaedic sports injuries -Arthroscopic Surgery (Shoulder/Elbow/Wrist/Hip/Knee/Ankle/Foot) -Relevant translational research -Sports traumatology/epidemiology -Knee and shoulder arthroplasty The OJSM also publishes relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信