{"title":"Does deformation of immobilization devices impact treatment accuracy in thoracic cancer radiotherapy?","authors":"Lianzi Zhao, Louzheng Zhang, Yiwen Hu, Yang Zhong","doi":"10.1002/acm2.14619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immobilization devices are essential for maintaining accurate and repeatable patient positioning in radiotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate the setup errors and dosimetric deviation induced by the deformation of immobilization devices in thoracic cancer radiotherapy using CT-linac.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 40 thoracic cancer patients who underwent radiotherapy, using vacuum cushion (VC) and thermoplastic mask (TM) for immobilization. A total of 206 weekly Fan-beam CT (FBCT) images (4-7 per patient) were analyzed to manually delineate immobilization devices and assess their geometric deformations against setup errors. Dosimetric deviations between the clinical plan (CT-plan) and the delivered plan (FBCT-plan) were compared for planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs). Correlations between dose variations and setup errors were analyzed in lateral (LAT), longitudinal (LNG), and vertical (VRT) axes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The conformity of the VC (N<sub>up</sub>) and TM (N<sub>down</sub>) with the patient in simulation CT exhibited moderate to strong correlations with VRT setup errors (N<sub>down</sub>: r = -0.484, p < 0.01;N<sub>up</sub>: r = -0.697, p < 0.01). However, intra-fraction deformation of immobilization devices (in FBCT) showed no significant correlation with setup errors. In the dosimetric analysis of OARs, lung dose parameters (D<sub>mean</sub>, V<sub>5</sub>, V<sub>20</sub>) and heart D<sub>mean</sub> exhibited a consistent absolute difference with increasing setup errors. Dose variation decreased significantly when errors exceeded 5 mm, particularly in the VRT direction for most PTV indices, with the exception of CI and HI. Spinal cord D<sub>max</sub> variation correlated significantly with setup accuracy along the LNG axis, but not along other axes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The conformity of immobilization devices in simulation CT exhibits a stronger correlation with setup accuracy than the deformation of these devices in intra-fraction FBCT. FBCT is recommended for improving treatment precision through dosimetric assessment and planning adjustments.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":"e14619"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14619","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Immobilization devices are essential for maintaining accurate and repeatable patient positioning in radiotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate the setup errors and dosimetric deviation induced by the deformation of immobilization devices in thoracic cancer radiotherapy using CT-linac.
Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 40 thoracic cancer patients who underwent radiotherapy, using vacuum cushion (VC) and thermoplastic mask (TM) for immobilization. A total of 206 weekly Fan-beam CT (FBCT) images (4-7 per patient) were analyzed to manually delineate immobilization devices and assess their geometric deformations against setup errors. Dosimetric deviations between the clinical plan (CT-plan) and the delivered plan (FBCT-plan) were compared for planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs). Correlations between dose variations and setup errors were analyzed in lateral (LAT), longitudinal (LNG), and vertical (VRT) axes.
Results: The conformity of the VC (Nup) and TM (Ndown) with the patient in simulation CT exhibited moderate to strong correlations with VRT setup errors (Ndown: r = -0.484, p < 0.01;Nup: r = -0.697, p < 0.01). However, intra-fraction deformation of immobilization devices (in FBCT) showed no significant correlation with setup errors. In the dosimetric analysis of OARs, lung dose parameters (Dmean, V5, V20) and heart Dmean exhibited a consistent absolute difference with increasing setup errors. Dose variation decreased significantly when errors exceeded 5 mm, particularly in the VRT direction for most PTV indices, with the exception of CI and HI. Spinal cord Dmax variation correlated significantly with setup accuracy along the LNG axis, but not along other axes.
Conclusion: The conformity of immobilization devices in simulation CT exhibits a stronger correlation with setup accuracy than the deformation of these devices in intra-fraction FBCT. FBCT is recommended for improving treatment precision through dosimetric assessment and planning adjustments.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic