Planning a Phased Guideline Implementation Strategy Across the Multicenter Ventilation Liberation for Kids (VentLib4Kids) Collaborative.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Jeremy M Loberger, Kristine R Hearld, Akira Nishisaki, Robinder G Khemani, Katherine M Steffen, Samer Abu-Sultaneh
{"title":"Planning a Phased Guideline Implementation Strategy Across the Multicenter Ventilation Liberation for Kids (VentLib4Kids) Collaborative.","authors":"Jeremy M Loberger, Kristine R Hearld, Akira Nishisaki, Robinder G Khemani, Katherine M Steffen, Samer Abu-Sultaneh","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate contextual factors relevant to implementing pediatric ventilator liberation guidelines and to develop an implementation strategy for a multicenter collaborative.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional qualitative analysis of a 2023/2024 survey.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>International, multicenter Ventilation Liberation for Kids (VentLib4Kids) collaborative.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Physicians, advanced practice providers, respiratory therapists, and nurses.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The survey was distributed to 26 PICUs representing 18 unique centers (17 in North American)-14 general medical/surgical, eight cardiac, and four mixed (1935 solicitations). All 409 responses were analyzed (prescribers 39.8%, nursing 32.8%, and respiratory therapists 27.4%). Three implementation tiers were identified based on perceptions of evidence, feasibility, positive impact, and favorability constructs. Tier A (≥ 80% agreement for all constructs) included extubation readiness testing (ERT) screening, ERT bundle, spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs), upper airway obstruction (UAO) risk mitigation, and risk stratified noninvasive respiratory support (NRS). Tier B (50-79% agreement) included standard risk SBT method, risk stratified SBT duration, and UAO risk assessment. Tier C (< 50% agreement) included high-risk SBT method, respiratory muscle strength testing, and infant NRS. The smallest perceived practice gaps were noted in tier A and the largest in tier C. The smallest practice gap was risk stratified NRS (88% agreement). The largest practice gap was respiratory muscle strength (18% agreement). In regression analysis, independently significant differences in perceptions based on role and unit type for multiple constructs were identified for UAO risk assessment, UAO risk mitigation, risk stratified NRS, and infant NRS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This survey study of the VentLib4Kids collaborative lays the foundation for phased implementation of the 2023 pediatric ventilator liberation guidelines. Early phases should focus on the best implementation profiles and smallest practice gaps. Later phases should address those that are more challenging. Unit- and role-based tailoring of differences should be considered for some recommendations more than others.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003673","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate contextual factors relevant to implementing pediatric ventilator liberation guidelines and to develop an implementation strategy for a multicenter collaborative.

Design: Cross-sectional qualitative analysis of a 2023/2024 survey.

Setting: International, multicenter Ventilation Liberation for Kids (VentLib4Kids) collaborative.

Subjects: Physicians, advanced practice providers, respiratory therapists, and nurses.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: The survey was distributed to 26 PICUs representing 18 unique centers (17 in North American)-14 general medical/surgical, eight cardiac, and four mixed (1935 solicitations). All 409 responses were analyzed (prescribers 39.8%, nursing 32.8%, and respiratory therapists 27.4%). Three implementation tiers were identified based on perceptions of evidence, feasibility, positive impact, and favorability constructs. Tier A (≥ 80% agreement for all constructs) included extubation readiness testing (ERT) screening, ERT bundle, spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs), upper airway obstruction (UAO) risk mitigation, and risk stratified noninvasive respiratory support (NRS). Tier B (50-79% agreement) included standard risk SBT method, risk stratified SBT duration, and UAO risk assessment. Tier C (< 50% agreement) included high-risk SBT method, respiratory muscle strength testing, and infant NRS. The smallest perceived practice gaps were noted in tier A and the largest in tier C. The smallest practice gap was risk stratified NRS (88% agreement). The largest practice gap was respiratory muscle strength (18% agreement). In regression analysis, independently significant differences in perceptions based on role and unit type for multiple constructs were identified for UAO risk assessment, UAO risk mitigation, risk stratified NRS, and infant NRS.

Conclusions: This survey study of the VentLib4Kids collaborative lays the foundation for phased implementation of the 2023 pediatric ventilator liberation guidelines. Early phases should focus on the best implementation profiles and smallest practice gaps. Later phases should address those that are more challenging. Unit- and role-based tailoring of differences should be considered for some recommendations more than others.

规划跨多中心儿童通风解放(VentLib4Kids)的阶段性指南实施策略
目的:评估与实施儿童呼吸机解放指南相关的环境因素,并制定多中心合作的实施策略。设计:对2023/2024年调查进行横断面定性分析。设置:国际多中心儿童通风解放(VentLib4Kids)协作。研究对象:内科医生、高级执业医师、呼吸治疗师和护士。干预措施:没有。测量和主要结果:调查分布到代表18个独特中心(17个在北美)的26个picu -14个普通内科/外科中心,8个心脏中心和4个混合中心(1935年征求)。对所有409份回复进行分析(处方医生39.8%,护理人员32.8%,呼吸治疗师27.4%)。根据对证据、可行性、积极影响和好感度结构的看法确定了三个实施层。A级(所有结构的一致性≥80%)包括拔管准备测试(ERT)筛查、ERT束、自主呼吸试验(sbt)、上呼吸道阻塞(UAO)风险缓解和风险分层无创呼吸支持(NRS)。B级(50-79%同意)包括标准风险SBT方法、风险分层SBT持续时间和UAO风险评估。C级(一致性< 50%)包括高危SBT方法、呼吸肌力量测试和婴儿NRS。感知到的实践差距最小的是A级,最大的是c级。最小的实践差距是风险分层的NRS(88%的一致性)。最大的练习差距是呼吸肌力量(18%一致)。在回归分析中,我们发现在UAO风险评估、UAO风险缓解、风险分层NRS和婴儿NRS中,基于角色和单位类型的多重结构的感知存在独立的显著差异。结论:VentLib4Kids合作的调查研究为2023年儿科呼吸机解放指南的分阶段实施奠定了基础。早期阶段应该关注于最佳的实现概要和最小的实践差距。后期阶段应该解决那些更具挑战性的问题。对于某些建议,应该比其他建议更多地考虑基于单元和角色的差异剪裁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
14.60%
发文量
991
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Critical Care Medicine is written for the entire critical care team: pediatricians, neonatologists, respiratory therapists, nurses, and others who deal with pediatric patients who are critically ill or injured. International in scope, with editorial board members and contributors from around the world, the Journal includes a full range of scientific content, including clinical articles, scientific investigations, solicited reviews, and abstracts from pediatric critical care meetings. Additionally, the Journal includes abstracts of selected articles published in Chinese, French, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese, and Spanish translations - making news of advances in the field available to pediatric and neonatal intensive care practitioners worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信