Stakeholder perspectives on the current status and potential barriers of patient involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) across Europe.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Anke-Peggy Holtorf, Neil Bertelsen, Hannes Jarke, Maria Dutarte, Silvia Scalabrini, Valentina Strammiello
{"title":"Stakeholder perspectives on the current status and potential barriers of patient involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) across Europe.","authors":"Anke-Peggy Holtorf, Neil Bertelsen, Hannes Jarke, Maria Dutarte, Silvia Scalabrini, Valentina Strammiello","doi":"10.1017/S0266462324004707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are wide variations in the practices of patient involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) in Europe. The field is lacking a consensus on good practices, leading to divergent processes, methods, and evaluation of patient involvement. To identify potential good practice approaches and current gaps, a structured online survey was conducted among HTA stakeholders, including HTA practitioners, patient stakeholders, industry representatives, and others who had experienced patient involvement in HTA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The questionnaire was co-created by HTA experts, patient stakeholders, and industry representatives and disseminated between 29 April and 14 September 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses (n = 168) were submitted from thirty-two European countries by HTA practitioners (n = 33), patient stakeholders (n = 75), industry stakeholders (n = 42), providers (n = 5), academics (n = 7), and others (n = 6). The responses indicated that \"<i>allowing access to treatments that have demonstrated value\"</i>is the principle rationale for conducting HTA. In terms of the importance of patient involvement, there was consensus across stakeholder groups that \"<i>patients have insights and information [that] no other stakeholder has</i>\" and that patient involvement is important \"<i>to inform HTA which evidence is most patient-relevant</i>\". Shortcomings were identified in the lack of systematic and transparent processes, an unsatisfactory level of information and guidance, and minimal communication and collaboration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The diverse stakeholders who responded highlighted the need for improving specific aspects of patient involvement practices, including better guidance and information, a more consistent flow of communication between the HTA body and participating patient stakeholders, and the need to develop and implement a consensus on good practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":14467,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","volume":"40 1","pages":"e81"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462324004707","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There are wide variations in the practices of patient involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) in Europe. The field is lacking a consensus on good practices, leading to divergent processes, methods, and evaluation of patient involvement. To identify potential good practice approaches and current gaps, a structured online survey was conducted among HTA stakeholders, including HTA practitioners, patient stakeholders, industry representatives, and others who had experienced patient involvement in HTA.

Methods: The questionnaire was co-created by HTA experts, patient stakeholders, and industry representatives and disseminated between 29 April and 14 September 2022.

Results: Responses (n = 168) were submitted from thirty-two European countries by HTA practitioners (n = 33), patient stakeholders (n = 75), industry stakeholders (n = 42), providers (n = 5), academics (n = 7), and others (n = 6). The responses indicated that "allowing access to treatments that have demonstrated value"is the principle rationale for conducting HTA. In terms of the importance of patient involvement, there was consensus across stakeholder groups that "patients have insights and information [that] no other stakeholder has" and that patient involvement is important "to inform HTA which evidence is most patient-relevant". Shortcomings were identified in the lack of systematic and transparent processes, an unsatisfactory level of information and guidance, and minimal communication and collaboration.

Conclusions: The diverse stakeholders who responded highlighted the need for improving specific aspects of patient involvement practices, including better guidance and information, a more consistent flow of communication between the HTA body and participating patient stakeholders, and the need to develop and implement a consensus on good practices.

利益相关者对整个欧洲患者参与卫生技术评估(HTA)的现状和潜在障碍的看法。
背景:在欧洲,患者参与卫生技术评估(HTA)的做法存在很大差异。该领域缺乏对良好实践的共识,导致不同的过程、方法和患者参与的评估。为了确定潜在的良好实践方法和当前的差距,在HTA利益相关者中进行了一项结构化的在线调查,包括HTA从业者、患者利益相关者、行业代表和其他经历过患者参与HTA的人。方法:问卷由HTA专家、患者利益相关者和行业代表共同制作,于2022年4月29日至9月14日发放。结果:来自32个欧洲国家的HTA从业者(n = 33)、患者利益相关者(n = 75)、行业利益相关者(n = 42)、提供者(n = 5)、学者(n = 7)和其他人(n = 6)提交了回复(n = 168)。回复表明,“允许获得已证明有价值的治疗”是开展HTA的主要理由。就患者参与的重要性而言,利益相关者群体一致认为“患者拥有其他利益相关者没有的见解和信息”,并且患者参与“对于告知HTA哪些证据与患者最相关”很重要。缺点是缺乏系统和透明的进程,信息和指导水平不令人满意,沟通和协作最少。结论:不同利益相关者的回应强调需要改进患者参与实践的具体方面,包括更好的指导和信息,HTA机构与参与的患者利益相关者之间更一致的沟通,以及制定和实施良好实践共识的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.60%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care serves as a forum for the wide range of health policy makers and professionals interested in the economic, social, ethical, medical and public health implications of health technology. It covers the development, evaluation, diffusion and use of health technology, as well as its impact on the organization and management of health care systems and public health. In addition to general essays and research reports, regular columns on technology assessment reports and thematic sections are published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信