Oncologic Outcomes of Sequential Intravesical Gemcitabine and Docetaxel Compared with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin in Patients with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin-Unresponsive Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer.

IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Jacob Taylor, Ashish M Kamat, Drupad Annapureddy, Zine-Eddine Khene, Jeffrey Howard, Wei Shen Tan, Ian M McElree, Davaro Facundo, Kendrick Yim, Stephen Harrington, Elizabeth Dyer, Anna J Black, Pratik Kanabur, Mathieu Roumiguié, Seth Lerner, Peter C Black, Jay Raman, Mark Preston, Gary Steinberg, William Huang, Roger Li, Vignesh T Packiam, Solomon L Woldu, Yair Lotan, Michael A O'Donnell
{"title":"Oncologic Outcomes of Sequential Intravesical Gemcitabine and Docetaxel Compared with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin in Patients with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin-Unresponsive Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer.","authors":"Jacob Taylor, Ashish M Kamat, Drupad Annapureddy, Zine-Eddine Khene, Jeffrey Howard, Wei Shen Tan, Ian M McElree, Davaro Facundo, Kendrick Yim, Stephen Harrington, Elizabeth Dyer, Anna J Black, Pratik Kanabur, Mathieu Roumiguié, Seth Lerner, Peter C Black, Jay Raman, Mark Preston, Gary Steinberg, William Huang, Roger Li, Vignesh T Packiam, Solomon L Woldu, Yair Lotan, Michael A O'Donnell","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.12.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients treated with additional bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) may become unresponsive to BCG. Recently, sequential intravesical gemcitabine and docetaxel (gem/doce) are being used for NMIBC. This study aims to compare oncologic outcomes between sequential intravesical gem/doce versus additional BCG in patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from ten academic institutions on patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC based on the Food and Drug Administration guidelines. Information on high-grade recurrence-free (HGRFS), progression-free (PFS), cystectomy-free (CFS), metastasis-free (MFS), cancer-specific (CSS), and overall (OS) survival was collected. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) were used to determine differences in oncologic outcomes between the Gem/Doce and BCG groups.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Of 299 total patients, 204 underwent additional BCG treatment at the time of BCG unresponsiveness and 95 underwent gem/doce treatment. Rates of PFS (HR 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-5.0, p = 0.03), CFS (HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.4, p = 0.01), and CSS (HR 3.7, 95% CI 1.1-12.3, p=0.03) were higher in patients receiving gem/doce. HGRFS, MFS, and OS were similar between both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>The findings from this study suggest that intravesical gem/doce is associated with lower rates of progression than additional BCG in patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC who decline or are ineligible for cystectomy.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>In this report, we looked at outcomes between patients with noninvasive bladder cancer who were treated with additional bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) or gemcitabine-docetaxel combination after not responding to primary BCG therapy. We found that intravesical gemcitabine-docetaxel was associated with fewer progression events than additional salvage BCG therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.12.005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients treated with additional bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) may become unresponsive to BCG. Recently, sequential intravesical gemcitabine and docetaxel (gem/doce) are being used for NMIBC. This study aims to compare oncologic outcomes between sequential intravesical gem/doce versus additional BCG in patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC.

Methods: Data were collected from ten academic institutions on patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC based on the Food and Drug Administration guidelines. Information on high-grade recurrence-free (HGRFS), progression-free (PFS), cystectomy-free (CFS), metastasis-free (MFS), cancer-specific (CSS), and overall (OS) survival was collected. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) were used to determine differences in oncologic outcomes between the Gem/Doce and BCG groups.

Key findings and limitations: Of 299 total patients, 204 underwent additional BCG treatment at the time of BCG unresponsiveness and 95 underwent gem/doce treatment. Rates of PFS (HR 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-5.0, p = 0.03), CFS (HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.4, p = 0.01), and CSS (HR 3.7, 95% CI 1.1-12.3, p=0.03) were higher in patients receiving gem/doce. HGRFS, MFS, and OS were similar between both groups.

Conclusions and clinical implications: The findings from this study suggest that intravesical gem/doce is associated with lower rates of progression than additional BCG in patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC who decline or are ineligible for cystectomy.

Patient summary: In this report, we looked at outcomes between patients with noninvasive bladder cancer who were treated with additional bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) or gemcitabine-docetaxel combination after not responding to primary BCG therapy. We found that intravesical gemcitabine-docetaxel was associated with fewer progression events than additional salvage BCG therapy.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
128
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: Journal Name: European Urology Oncology Affiliation: Official Journal of the European Association of Urology Focus: First official publication of the EAU fully devoted to the study of genitourinary malignancies Aims to deliver high-quality research Content: Includes original articles, opinion piece editorials, and invited reviews Covers clinical, basic, and translational research Publication Frequency: Six times a year in electronic format
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信