The Cost of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Type 1 Diabetes Pregnancies in the United States: A Cost-Consequences Analysis Using Real-World Evidence.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Michael J DiStefano, R Brett McQueen, Valerie Gao, Matthew P Klein, Janet K Snell-Bergeon, Sarit Polsky
{"title":"The Cost of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Type 1 Diabetes Pregnancies in the United States: A Cost-Consequences Analysis Using Real-World Evidence.","authors":"Michael J DiStefano, R Brett McQueen, Valerie Gao, Matthew P Klein, Janet K Snell-Bergeon, Sarit Polsky","doi":"10.1089/dia.2024.0478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Data on the cost implications of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) use in type 1 diabetes (T1D) pregnancies in the United States are sparse. Drawing on associations identified in real-world evidence from a retrospective chart review at the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, we conducted a cost-consequences analysis of CGM use versus self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), inclusive of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) spending. In the base-case analysis assuming per-label CGM use and per-guideline finger-stick frequency, the per-person cost was $16,254 for CGM versus $15,182 for SMBG. In a real-world scenario analysis, the per-person cost was $13,708 for CGM versus $14,524 for SMBG. In both analyses, there was a cost savings for NICU admissions of $2,903 with CGM use. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, CGM was cost saving in 25% of base-case model iterations and 46% of real-world model iterations. This study adds to the growing evidence base that the increased costs of CGM use versus SMBG to manage T1D pregnancies are likely offset by better neonatal health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11159,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2024.0478","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Data on the cost implications of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) use in type 1 diabetes (T1D) pregnancies in the United States are sparse. Drawing on associations identified in real-world evidence from a retrospective chart review at the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, we conducted a cost-consequences analysis of CGM use versus self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), inclusive of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) spending. In the base-case analysis assuming per-label CGM use and per-guideline finger-stick frequency, the per-person cost was $16,254 for CGM versus $15,182 for SMBG. In a real-world scenario analysis, the per-person cost was $13,708 for CGM versus $14,524 for SMBG. In both analyses, there was a cost savings for NICU admissions of $2,903 with CGM use. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, CGM was cost saving in 25% of base-case model iterations and 46% of real-world model iterations. This study adds to the growing evidence base that the increased costs of CGM use versus SMBG to manage T1D pregnancies are likely offset by better neonatal health outcomes.

美国1型糖尿病孕妇持续血糖监测与自我血糖监测的成本:使用真实世界证据的成本-后果分析
在美国,持续血糖监测(CGM)用于1型糖尿病(T1D)妊娠的成本影响的数据很少。根据Barbara Davis糖尿病中心的一项回顾性图表回顾中发现的现实证据,我们对使用CGM与自我血糖监测(SMBG)进行了成本-后果分析,包括新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)的支出。在基本情况分析中,假设每个标签的CGM使用和每个指南的手指插入频率,CGM的人均成本为16,254美元,而SMBG的人均成本为15,182美元。在现实场景分析中,CGM的人均成本为13,708美元,而SMBG的人均成本为14,524美元。在这两项分析中,使用CGM可节省NICU住院费用2,903美元。在概率敏感性分析中,CGM在25%的基本情况模型迭代和46%的实际模型迭代中节省了成本。越来越多的证据表明,与SMBG相比,使用CGM治疗T1D妊娠的成本增加可能被更好的新生儿健康结果所抵消。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes technology & therapeutics
Diabetes technology & therapeutics 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
14.80%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal providing healthcare professionals with information on new devices, drugs, drug delivery systems, and software for managing patients with diabetes. This leading international journal delivers practical information and comprehensive coverage of cutting-edge technologies and therapeutics in the field, and each issue highlights new pharmacological and device developments to optimize patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信