Nurse-Led Multicomponent Behavioral Activation Intervention for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Polly W C Li, Doris S F Yu, Bryan P Yan
{"title":"Nurse-Led Multicomponent Behavioral Activation Intervention for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Polly W C Li, Doris S F Yu, Bryan P Yan","doi":"10.1161/CIRCEP.124.013236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are often ill-equipped for shared decision-making. This study investigated the effects of a patient empowerment care model on patient-reported health outcomes and treatment decision-making in patients with AF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized controlled trial prospectively randomized patients with AF to receive standard care (n=194) or a 13-week nurse-led multicomponent behavioral activation intervention (n=198). The intervention consisted of risk profile assessments, empowered shared decision-making regarding the use of oral anticoagulants (OACs), empowered AF self-management, and increased access to professional advice. The primary outcome was health-related quality of life measured after the completion of the intervention (T1), while the secondary outcomes were patient-physician decision concordance regarding OAC use, actual OAC use, AF knowledge, medication adherence, anxiety, and depression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intervention group showed significantly greater improvements in health-related quality of life (β, -6.702 [95% CI, -9.556 to -3.847]; <i>P</i><0.001), AF knowledge (β, -1.989 [95% CI, -2.342 to -1.635]; <i>P</i><0.001), and medication adherence (β, 0.340 [95% CI, 0.148-0.532]; <i>P</i><0.001) at immediate post-intervention compared with the control group, and the improvements were sustained at 6 months for all outcomes. A higher proportion of patients in the intervention group were prescribed an OAC compared with the control group at 6 months (odds ratio, 5.870 [95% CI, 1.957-12.331]; <i>P</i>=0.012). No significant between-group differences were detected for patient-physician decision concordance regarding OAC use, anxiety, or depression at both time points.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The nurse-led multicomponent behavioral activation intervention improved patient-reported outcomes and increased OAC prescription among patients with AF.</p>","PeriodicalId":10319,"journal":{"name":"Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"e013236"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.124.013236","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are often ill-equipped for shared decision-making. This study investigated the effects of a patient empowerment care model on patient-reported health outcomes and treatment decision-making in patients with AF.

Methods: This randomized controlled trial prospectively randomized patients with AF to receive standard care (n=194) or a 13-week nurse-led multicomponent behavioral activation intervention (n=198). The intervention consisted of risk profile assessments, empowered shared decision-making regarding the use of oral anticoagulants (OACs), empowered AF self-management, and increased access to professional advice. The primary outcome was health-related quality of life measured after the completion of the intervention (T1), while the secondary outcomes were patient-physician decision concordance regarding OAC use, actual OAC use, AF knowledge, medication adherence, anxiety, and depression.

Results: The intervention group showed significantly greater improvements in health-related quality of life (β, -6.702 [95% CI, -9.556 to -3.847]; P<0.001), AF knowledge (β, -1.989 [95% CI, -2.342 to -1.635]; P<0.001), and medication adherence (β, 0.340 [95% CI, 0.148-0.532]; P<0.001) at immediate post-intervention compared with the control group, and the improvements were sustained at 6 months for all outcomes. A higher proportion of patients in the intervention group were prescribed an OAC compared with the control group at 6 months (odds ratio, 5.870 [95% CI, 1.957-12.331]; P=0.012). No significant between-group differences were detected for patient-physician decision concordance regarding OAC use, anxiety, or depression at both time points.

Conclusions: The nurse-led multicomponent behavioral activation intervention improved patient-reported outcomes and increased OAC prescription among patients with AF.

护士主导的心房颤动患者多组分行为激活干预:一项随机对照试验。
背景:心房颤动(AF)患者通常不具备共同决策的能力。本研究探讨了患者授权护理模式对房颤患者报告的健康结果和治疗决策的影响。方法:本随机对照试验前瞻性地将房颤患者随机分配接受标准治疗(n=194)或13周护士主导的多成分行为激活干预(n=198)。干预措施包括风险概况评估、关于口服抗凝剂(OACs)使用的共同决策授权、AF自我管理授权以及增加获得专业建议的机会。主要结局是干预完成后测量的与健康相关的生活质量(T1),而次要结局是关于OAC使用、OAC实际使用、AF知识、药物依从性、焦虑和抑郁的患者-医生决策一致性。结果:干预组在健康相关生活质量方面的改善显著更大(β, -6.702 [95% CI, -9.556 ~ -3.847];PPPP = 0.012)。在两个时间点,在OAC使用、焦虑或抑郁方面的患者-医生决策一致性方面,组间未发现显著差异。结论:护士主导的多组分行为激活干预改善了患者报告的结果,并增加了房颤患者的OAC处方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology is a journal dedicated to the study and application of clinical cardiac electrophysiology. It covers a wide range of topics including the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias, as well as research in this field. The journal accepts various types of studies, including observational research, clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and advancements in translational research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信