Ursodeoxycholic acid for the treatment of hepatic sarcoid: A pre-post pilot study.

IF 1.5 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Clinical and Experimental Hepatology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-25 DOI:10.5114/ceh.2024.141732
Ethan Weinberg, Aimee Stonelake, Kelly Borges, Emily Toal, Sevda Aghayeva, Milton Rossman, Colin Ligon, K Rajender Reddy
{"title":"Ursodeoxycholic acid for the treatment of hepatic sarcoid: A pre-post pilot study.","authors":"Ethan Weinberg, Aimee Stonelake, Kelly Borges, Emily Toal, Sevda Aghayeva, Milton Rossman, Colin Ligon, K Rajender Reddy","doi":"10.5114/ceh.2024.141732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>Sarcoidosis is characterized by noncaseating granulomas that can affect multiple organs. Due to the lack of prospective studies regarding treatment of hepatic sarcoidosis with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), we set out to evaluate its effects in a single-center, open-label, prospective, pre-post study.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 10 patients were screened from August 2018 to July 2020; seven met the criteria and were enrolled. The study was terminated prior to achieving target enrollment of 10 patients due to the difficulty in recruitment around the COVID-19 pandemic. Most patients were women (4/7; 57.1%) and African American (5/7; 71.4%). One patient dropped out during the first month of observation due to a new diagnosis of esophageal cancer. Six completed the 6-month observation and UDCA treatment periods. One patient stopped UDCA within the first month of active treatment due to the side effect of nausea.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a decrease in ALP and GGT after six months of UDCA treatment compared to six months of observation (ALP - 257.6 to 202.2, <i>p</i> = 0.23; GGT - 302.5 to 111.8, <i>p</i> = 0.059), but this did not reach statistical significance. There were also decreases in all key secondary endpoints (ALT - 50.8 to 29.8, <i>p</i> = NS; AST - 40.3 to 31.2, <i>p</i> = NS, VCTE kPa - 8.3 to 6.3, <i>p</i> = NS). As with the primary endpoints, none of the key secondary endpoints reached statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is significant potential for UDCA as first-line treatment of hepatic sarcoid. Multi-center, ideally prospective, studies of longer duration are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":10281,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Hepatology","volume":"10 3","pages":"194-196"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11650808/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ceh.2024.141732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim of the study: Sarcoidosis is characterized by noncaseating granulomas that can affect multiple organs. Due to the lack of prospective studies regarding treatment of hepatic sarcoidosis with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), we set out to evaluate its effects in a single-center, open-label, prospective, pre-post study.

Material and methods: A total of 10 patients were screened from August 2018 to July 2020; seven met the criteria and were enrolled. The study was terminated prior to achieving target enrollment of 10 patients due to the difficulty in recruitment around the COVID-19 pandemic. Most patients were women (4/7; 57.1%) and African American (5/7; 71.4%). One patient dropped out during the first month of observation due to a new diagnosis of esophageal cancer. Six completed the 6-month observation and UDCA treatment periods. One patient stopped UDCA within the first month of active treatment due to the side effect of nausea.

Results: There was a decrease in ALP and GGT after six months of UDCA treatment compared to six months of observation (ALP - 257.6 to 202.2, p = 0.23; GGT - 302.5 to 111.8, p = 0.059), but this did not reach statistical significance. There were also decreases in all key secondary endpoints (ALT - 50.8 to 29.8, p = NS; AST - 40.3 to 31.2, p = NS, VCTE kPa - 8.3 to 6.3, p = NS). As with the primary endpoints, none of the key secondary endpoints reached statistical significance.

Conclusions: There is significant potential for UDCA as first-line treatment of hepatic sarcoid. Multi-center, ideally prospective, studies of longer duration are needed.

熊去氧胆酸治疗肝肉瘤:一项前期-后期试点研究。
研究目的:结节病以非干酪化肉芽肿为特征,可影响多个器官。由于缺乏关于熊去氧胆酸(UDCA)治疗肝结节病的前瞻性研究,我们开始在单中心、开放标签、前瞻性、前后研究中评估其效果。材料与方法:2018年8月至2020年7月共筛查10例患者;其中7人符合标准并入选。由于在COVID-19大流行期间招募困难,该研究在实现10例患者的目标入组之前终止。大多数患者为女性(4/7;57.1%)和非洲裔美国人(5/7;71.4%)。一名患者在观察的第一个月因新诊断为食管癌而退出。6例完成了6个月的观察和UDCA治疗期。一名患者在积极治疗的第一个月内由于恶心的副作用停止了UDCA。结果:与观察6个月相比,UDCA治疗6个月后ALP和GGT下降(ALP - 257.6 ~ 202.2, p = 0.23;GGT - 302.5 ~ 111.8, p = 0.059),但没有达到统计学意义。所有关键次要终点(ALT - 50.8至29.8,p = NS;AST - 40.3至31.2,p = NS, VCTE kPa - 8.3至6.3,p = NS)。与主要终点一样,没有一个关键的次要终点达到统计学意义。结论:UDCA作为肝肉瘤的一线治疗有很大的潜力。需要多中心、理想的前瞻性、更长时间的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Hepatology
Clinical and Experimental Hepatology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Hepatology – quarterly of the Polish Association for Study of Liver – is a scientific and educational, peer-reviewed journal publishing original and review papers describing clinical and basic investigations in the field of hepatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信