Impact of zero-positive end-expiratory pressure on blood transfusion rates in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Kentaroh Tarao, Kyongsuk Son, Yusei Ishizuka, Atsushi Nakagomi, Maiko Hasegawa-Moriyama
{"title":"Impact of zero-positive end-expiratory pressure on blood transfusion rates in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Kentaroh Tarao, Kyongsuk Son, Yusei Ishizuka, Atsushi Nakagomi, Maiko Hasegawa-Moriyama","doi":"10.1186/s12871-024-02853-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bleeding are common in cardiac surgery, with significant impacts on transfusion-related complications and patient prognosis. This study aimed to determine the differences in perioperative blood loss, transfusion rates, and the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) with and without the use of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery (OPCAB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, retrospective study included 106 adult patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery without cardiopulmonary bypass from January 2018 to March 2022. The patients were divided into two groups based on intraoperative ventilator settings: the zero-PEEP (ZEEP) group and the PEEP group. The primary outcome was the perioperative transfusion rate from the intraoperative period to postoperative 7 day. The incidence of PPCs was recorded for 1 week post-operatively. Logistic regression analysis was performed for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average PEEP in the PEEP group was 4.92 ± 0.42 cmH<sub>2</sub>O. Multiple regression analysis indicated that lower mean airway pressure during surgery tend to associate with intraoperative lower blood loss. The intraoperative transfusion rates in the ZEEP group were significantly lower than those in the PEEP group (ZEEP:14%, PEEP 38.4%, P = 0.02). Logistic regression analysis revealed that ZEEP (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04-0.78) and Society of Thoracic Surgeons(STS) scores (adjusted OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.53-3.49) were significantly associated with a reduced requirement for perioperative transfusions. No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of PPCs (p = 0.824). Atelectasis was the most common complication in both groups (ZEEP: 35.7%, PEEP: 40%, P = 0.832).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ZEEP and STS scores were associated with significantly reduced requirement for perioperative transfusion rates during elective OPCAB surgery. However, ZEEP did not significantly affect the incidence of PPCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"24 1","pages":"461"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02853-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bleeding are common in cardiac surgery, with significant impacts on transfusion-related complications and patient prognosis. This study aimed to determine the differences in perioperative blood loss, transfusion rates, and the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) with and without the use of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery (OPCAB).

Methods: This single-center, retrospective study included 106 adult patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery without cardiopulmonary bypass from January 2018 to March 2022. The patients were divided into two groups based on intraoperative ventilator settings: the zero-PEEP (ZEEP) group and the PEEP group. The primary outcome was the perioperative transfusion rate from the intraoperative period to postoperative 7 day. The incidence of PPCs was recorded for 1 week post-operatively. Logistic regression analysis was performed for statistical analysis.

Results: The average PEEP in the PEEP group was 4.92 ± 0.42 cmH2O. Multiple regression analysis indicated that lower mean airway pressure during surgery tend to associate with intraoperative lower blood loss. The intraoperative transfusion rates in the ZEEP group were significantly lower than those in the PEEP group (ZEEP:14%, PEEP 38.4%, P = 0.02). Logistic regression analysis revealed that ZEEP (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04-0.78) and Society of Thoracic Surgeons(STS) scores (adjusted OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.53-3.49) were significantly associated with a reduced requirement for perioperative transfusions. No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of PPCs (p = 0.824). Atelectasis was the most common complication in both groups (ZEEP: 35.7%, PEEP: 40%, P = 0.832).

Conclusions: ZEEP and STS scores were associated with significantly reduced requirement for perioperative transfusion rates during elective OPCAB surgery. However, ZEEP did not significantly affect the incidence of PPCs.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信