Tyler M Bauer, Allison M Janda, Xiaoting Wu, Carol Ling, Douglas C Shook, Gabriela Querejeta-Roca, Kenneth G Shann, Trevor Smith, Michael R Mathis, Tsuyoshi Kaneko, Thoralf M Sundt, Robert B Schonberger, Steven D Harrington, Roger D Dias, Francis D Pagani, Donald S Likosky, Steven Yule
{"title":"Multicenter Analysis of the Relationship Between Operative Team Familiarity and Safety and Efficiency Outcomes in Cardiac Surgery.","authors":"Tyler M Bauer, Allison M Janda, Xiaoting Wu, Carol Ling, Douglas C Shook, Gabriela Querejeta-Roca, Kenneth G Shann, Trevor Smith, Michael R Mathis, Tsuyoshi Kaneko, Thoralf M Sundt, Robert B Schonberger, Steven D Harrington, Roger D Dias, Francis D Pagani, Donald S Likosky, Steven Yule","doi":"10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Safety in cardiac surgical procedures is predicated on effective team dynamics. This study associated operative team familiarity (ie, the extent of clinical collaboration among surgical team members) with procedural efficiency and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) adjudicated patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Institutional STS adult cardiac surgery registry and electronic health record data from 2014 to 2021 were evaluated across 3 quaternary hospitals. Team familiarity was defined as the mean number of cardiac operations performed by surgeon-anesthesiologist, surgeon-perfusionist, and anesthesiologist-perfusionist dyads within 1 year of the operation. The primary outcomes were (1) safety, measured by the STS' composite major morbidity and operative mortality measure, and (2) procedural efficiency, assessed by cardiopulmonary bypass duration. Team familiarity was stratified by terciles (low, moderate, and high) for crude analyses and analyzed continuously for adjusted analyses. Multivariable logistic and linear regression models were used to assess the association between team familiarity and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Team familiarity was calculated for 13 581 operations. The median (interquartile range) patient age was 64 (55-72) years, and 31.9% (4328/13 581) were women. Terciles of team familiarity were defined as low (<6.00 average shared operations), moderate (6.00-9.67), and high (>9.67). Teams in lower terciles had higher observed STS morbidity and mortality rates (low, 17.9%; moderate, 18.0%; high, 16.0%; <i>P</i>=0.02) and longer median cardiopulmonary bypass duration (low, 137 minutes; moderate, 131 minutes; high, 118 minutes; <i>P</i><0.001). After risk adjustment, team familiarity was not significantly associated with STS morbidity and mortality (estimate, -0.001 [95% CI, -0.998 to 0.997]) but was inversely associated with cardiopulmonary bypass duration (estimate, -2.02 minutes per 1 unit increase in team familiarity [95% CI, -2.30 to -1.75]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increased team familiarity was not associated with STS morbidity and mortality but was inversely correlated with cardiopulmonary bypass duration, demonstrating potential benefit. Interventions aimed at improving team familiarity among operative teams may increase procedural efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":49221,"journal":{"name":"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","volume":"17 12","pages":"e011065"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11654451/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011065","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Safety in cardiac surgical procedures is predicated on effective team dynamics. This study associated operative team familiarity (ie, the extent of clinical collaboration among surgical team members) with procedural efficiency and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) adjudicated patient outcomes.
Methods: Institutional STS adult cardiac surgery registry and electronic health record data from 2014 to 2021 were evaluated across 3 quaternary hospitals. Team familiarity was defined as the mean number of cardiac operations performed by surgeon-anesthesiologist, surgeon-perfusionist, and anesthesiologist-perfusionist dyads within 1 year of the operation. The primary outcomes were (1) safety, measured by the STS' composite major morbidity and operative mortality measure, and (2) procedural efficiency, assessed by cardiopulmonary bypass duration. Team familiarity was stratified by terciles (low, moderate, and high) for crude analyses and analyzed continuously for adjusted analyses. Multivariable logistic and linear regression models were used to assess the association between team familiarity and outcomes.
Results: Team familiarity was calculated for 13 581 operations. The median (interquartile range) patient age was 64 (55-72) years, and 31.9% (4328/13 581) were women. Terciles of team familiarity were defined as low (<6.00 average shared operations), moderate (6.00-9.67), and high (>9.67). Teams in lower terciles had higher observed STS morbidity and mortality rates (low, 17.9%; moderate, 18.0%; high, 16.0%; P=0.02) and longer median cardiopulmonary bypass duration (low, 137 minutes; moderate, 131 minutes; high, 118 minutes; P<0.001). After risk adjustment, team familiarity was not significantly associated with STS morbidity and mortality (estimate, -0.001 [95% CI, -0.998 to 0.997]) but was inversely associated with cardiopulmonary bypass duration (estimate, -2.02 minutes per 1 unit increase in team familiarity [95% CI, -2.30 to -1.75]).
Conclusions: Increased team familiarity was not associated with STS morbidity and mortality but was inversely correlated with cardiopulmonary bypass duration, demonstrating potential benefit. Interventions aimed at improving team familiarity among operative teams may increase procedural efficiency.
期刊介绍:
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, an American Heart Association journal, publishes articles related to improving cardiovascular health and health care. Content includes original research, reviews, and case studies relevant to clinical decision-making and healthcare policy. The online-only journal is dedicated to furthering the mission of promoting safe, effective, efficient, equitable, timely, and patient-centered care. Through its articles and contributions, the journal equips you with the knowledge you need to improve clinical care and population health, and allows you to engage in scholarly activities of consequence to the health of the public. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes considers the following types of articles: Original Research Articles, Data Reports, Methods Papers, Cardiovascular Perspectives, Care Innovations, Novel Statistical Methods, Policy Briefs, Data Visualizations, and Caregiver or Patient Viewpoints.