Clinical Outcome of Single-Stage Posterior Decompression and Stabilisation for Spine Metastasis.

IF 0.6 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
C S Wang, Z Atan
{"title":"Clinical Outcome of Single-Stage Posterior Decompression and Stabilisation for Spine Metastasis.","authors":"C S Wang, Z Atan","doi":"10.5704/MOJ.2411.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Surgical treatment for indicated spinal metastases cases is an option to improve patients' outcomes. Local data in analysing the potential of patients' improvement after surgical treatment are limited. We intend to review the clinical outcomes of surgeries performed for cancer patients who were diagnosed with spinal metastases. We aim to identify factors associated with improved spinal pain, neurological deficit and patient survival.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The medical records of 51 patients who were diagnosed with thoracolumbar spinal metastatic tumour and underwent palliative single-stage posterior approach spinal surgery between June 2015 and June 2022 were recruited retrospectively. Patient demographic data, pre-operative and post-operative pain scores, neurological assessment and survival duration were collected from the medical records. Radiological findings were studied using respective imaging and reports.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 57.5 years, and the median survival was nine months after the surgical treatment. The post-operative pain improvements were statistically significant at two weeks (VAS improved from 5 to 2), and three months follow-up VAS was one (p<0.001 and p=0.009, respectively). At initial presentation, patients with a single-level spinal involvement had higher VAS compared to multiple spinal metastases (p=0.018). A total of 18 (35.3%) patients had improved one or more ASIA grades, of which eight (15.7%) of them had gain of ambulatory function (p<0.001). Twenty-seven (52.9%) patients were ambulatory post-operative. The slow growth type of primary carcinoma, post-operative ambulatory ability, and the absence of perioperative morbidity were factors associated with favourable survival duration (p=0.006, p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). Synchronous visceral metastases adversely affected the survival duration (p=0.008).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Single-stage posterior decompression and stabilisation improved the clinical outcomes of spinal pain and neurological deficit in metastatic spinal tumours. Type of primary tumour, visceral metastasis, perioperative morbidity, and post-operative ambulatory status significantly impact post-operative survival duration.</p>","PeriodicalId":45241,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal","volume":"18 3","pages":"32-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11647532/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.2411.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Surgical treatment for indicated spinal metastases cases is an option to improve patients' outcomes. Local data in analysing the potential of patients' improvement after surgical treatment are limited. We intend to review the clinical outcomes of surgeries performed for cancer patients who were diagnosed with spinal metastases. We aim to identify factors associated with improved spinal pain, neurological deficit and patient survival.

Material and methods: The medical records of 51 patients who were diagnosed with thoracolumbar spinal metastatic tumour and underwent palliative single-stage posterior approach spinal surgery between June 2015 and June 2022 were recruited retrospectively. Patient demographic data, pre-operative and post-operative pain scores, neurological assessment and survival duration were collected from the medical records. Radiological findings were studied using respective imaging and reports.

Results: The mean age was 57.5 years, and the median survival was nine months after the surgical treatment. The post-operative pain improvements were statistically significant at two weeks (VAS improved from 5 to 2), and three months follow-up VAS was one (p<0.001 and p=0.009, respectively). At initial presentation, patients with a single-level spinal involvement had higher VAS compared to multiple spinal metastases (p=0.018). A total of 18 (35.3%) patients had improved one or more ASIA grades, of which eight (15.7%) of them had gain of ambulatory function (p<0.001). Twenty-seven (52.9%) patients were ambulatory post-operative. The slow growth type of primary carcinoma, post-operative ambulatory ability, and the absence of perioperative morbidity were factors associated with favourable survival duration (p=0.006, p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). Synchronous visceral metastases adversely affected the survival duration (p=0.008).

Conclusion: Single-stage posterior decompression and stabilisation improved the clinical outcomes of spinal pain and neurological deficit in metastatic spinal tumours. Type of primary tumour, visceral metastasis, perioperative morbidity, and post-operative ambulatory status significantly impact post-operative survival duration.

单段后路减压和稳定治疗脊柱转移的临床效果。
手术治疗指征性脊柱转移病例是改善患者预后的一种选择。分析手术治疗后患者改善潜力的本地数据有限。我们打算回顾为诊断为脊柱转移的癌症患者进行手术的临床结果。我们的目标是确定与改善脊柱疼痛、神经功能缺损和患者生存相关的因素。材料与方法:回顾性收集2015年6月至2022年6月间51例经诊断为胸腰椎转移瘤并行姑息性单期后路脊柱手术的患者的病历。从医疗记录中收集患者人口统计数据、术前和术后疼痛评分、神经系统评估和生存时间。利用各自的影像学和报告研究放射学表现。结果:患者平均年龄57.5岁,手术后中位生存期9个月。术后2周疼痛改善有统计学意义(VAS从5改善到2),随访3个月VAS为1(结论:单期后路减压和稳定改善了转移性脊柱肿瘤患者脊柱疼痛和神经功能障碍的临床结果)。原发肿瘤类型、内脏转移、围手术期发病率和术后活动状态显著影响术后生存时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original papers and case reports three times a year in both printed and electronic version. The purpose of MOJ is to disseminate new knowledge and provide updates in Orthopaedics, trauma and musculoskeletal research. It is an Open Access journal that does not require processing fee or article processing charge from the authors. The Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal is the official journal of Malaysian Orthopaedic Association (MOA) and ASEAN Orthopaedic Association (AOA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信