Barriers to establishing teledermatoscopy in primary health care in Sweden.

IF 2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Nils Hernström, Åsa Ingvar
{"title":"Barriers to establishing teledermatoscopy in primary health care in Sweden.","authors":"Nils Hernström, Åsa Ingvar","doi":"10.1186/s12875-024-02678-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Teledermatoscopy (TDS) has proven to be effective and reliable for diagnosis of skin malignancies. The factors that determine the success of implementation of TDS are largely unknown.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate barriers to implementation of TDS in primary health care (PHC) at center and individual level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following introduction of TDS, cross-sectional quantitative data and free text comments were collected by surveys sent to PHC centers and PCH practitioners. Successful implementation was defined as regularly sent cases at center level and self-reported usage at individual level. Factors associated with implementation were evaluated with Chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis test and logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>93/117 (78.2%) of PHC centers and 239/725 (32.9%) of PHC practitioners answered the surveys. 54.8% (n = 51) of PHC centers and 64.3% (n = 153) of PHC practitioners had implemented TDS. There was a strong association between hardware arrival before introduction and TDS usage at center level (OR 6.0; 95% CI 1.5-24.3). At individual level, male sex was positively associated with usage (OR 1.9; 95%, CI 1.0-3.4), and for every year of increased age, the chance of using TDS decreased with 3% (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.9-1.0). No other factor was associated with implementation. \"Good\" was the most common overall impression (54.8%), and the majority found no problems using the system (> 85%). The most common complaint was technical issues followed by no added value.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Successful implementation of TDS was strongly associated with hardware arrival at center level, and to male sex and younger age at individual level. Satisfaction was overall high.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"25 1","pages":"417"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11653750/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02678-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Teledermatoscopy (TDS) has proven to be effective and reliable for diagnosis of skin malignancies. The factors that determine the success of implementation of TDS are largely unknown.

Objectives: To investigate barriers to implementation of TDS in primary health care (PHC) at center and individual level.

Methods: Following introduction of TDS, cross-sectional quantitative data and free text comments were collected by surveys sent to PHC centers and PCH practitioners. Successful implementation was defined as regularly sent cases at center level and self-reported usage at individual level. Factors associated with implementation were evaluated with Chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis test and logistic regression.

Results: 93/117 (78.2%) of PHC centers and 239/725 (32.9%) of PHC practitioners answered the surveys. 54.8% (n = 51) of PHC centers and 64.3% (n = 153) of PHC practitioners had implemented TDS. There was a strong association between hardware arrival before introduction and TDS usage at center level (OR 6.0; 95% CI 1.5-24.3). At individual level, male sex was positively associated with usage (OR 1.9; 95%, CI 1.0-3.4), and for every year of increased age, the chance of using TDS decreased with 3% (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.9-1.0). No other factor was associated with implementation. "Good" was the most common overall impression (54.8%), and the majority found no problems using the system (> 85%). The most common complaint was technical issues followed by no added value.

Conclusions: Successful implementation of TDS was strongly associated with hardware arrival at center level, and to male sex and younger age at individual level. Satisfaction was overall high.

在瑞典初级卫生保健中建立远距离皮肤镜的障碍。
远程皮肤镜(TDS)已被证明是有效和可靠的诊断皮肤恶性肿瘤。决定TDS实施成功的因素在很大程度上是未知的。目的:探讨初级卫生保健(PHC)在中心和个人层面实施TDS的障碍。方法:引入TDS后,通过问卷调查收集断面定量数据和免费文本评论。成功的实现被定义为在中心级别定期发送案例,并在个人级别自我报告使用情况。采用卡方检验、Kruskal-Wallis检验和logistic回归评估与实施相关的因素。结果:93/117(78.2%)的PHC中心和239/725(32.9%)的PHC从业人员回答了调查。54.8% (n = 51)的PHC中心和64.3% (n = 153)的PHC从业人员实施了TDS。引入前硬件到达与中心级TDS使用之间存在很强的关联(OR 6.0;95% ci 1.5-24.3)。在个体水平上,男性性别与使用率呈正相关(OR 1.9;95%, CI 1.0-3.4),年龄每增加一年,使用TDS的机会降低3% (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.9-1.0)。没有其他因素与执行有关。“好”是最常见的整体印象(54.8%),大多数人认为使用该系统没有问题(> 85%)。最常见的抱怨是技术问题,其次是没有附加价值。结论:TDS的成功实施与硬件到达中心水平密切相关,在个体水平上与男性和年轻年龄密切相关。总体满意度很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信