Development of a standard set of key work-related outcomes for use in practice for patients with cardiovascular disease: a modified Delphi study.

IF 2.4 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Marije E Hagendijk, Nina Zipfel, Jan L Hoving, Marijke Melles, Philip J van der Wees, Sylvia J van der Burg-Vermeulen
{"title":"Development of a standard set of key work-related outcomes for use in practice for patients with cardiovascular disease: a modified Delphi study.","authors":"Marije E Hagendijk, Nina Zipfel, Jan L Hoving, Marijke Melles, Philip J van der Wees, Sylvia J van der Burg-Vermeulen","doi":"10.1186/s41687-024-00825-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To facilitate the maintenance or resumption of participation in work for patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD), there is a need for high-quality work-focused healthcare. According to the concept of value-based healthcare, quality of care can be enhanced by understanding the outcomes that matter most to patients. However, a major challenge in assessing quality of work-focused healthcare in practice is the lack of consensus on which work-related outcomes should be measured.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to identify a standard set of key work-related outcomes for patients with CVD to be used in practice of work-focused healthcare in the Netherlands, including standardised outcome measures and associated case mix factors. This standard set is intended to assist occupational and other health professionals in delivering work-focused healthcare that meets a patient's individual needs regarding work participation, and to enhance patients' engagement in their own work-focused care process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 2-round RAND-modified Delphi process was conducted. The process included literature searches, consecutive research team meetings, and several meetings and rounds of voting by a working group. The working group consisted of patients with CVD (n = 6) and health professionals representing different stakeholders (n = 11) involved in work-focused healthcare for this patient population in the Netherlands. Consensus was reached over four phases: (1) establishing the scope of the standard set and defining the population, (2) prioritising and defining the outcome domains, (3) selecting the outcome measures for the most important domains, including clinical data and patient-reported data, and (4) selecting and defining case mix factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A 23-item patient-reported questionnaire was developed, called the Value@WORK-Q23, including questions on nine work-related outcome domains considered most important for patients with CVD: (1) work participation, (2) physical work ability, (3) mental work ability, (4) suitable work, (5) support from the work environment, (6) flexibility of the work environment, (7) communication with the patient, (8) person-centredness, and (9) interdisciplinary communication. In addition, nine case mix variables was selected, comprising demographic-, disease-, and work factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Value@WORK-Q23 provides guidance on measuring the most important work-related outcomes for patients with CVD. Using this work-related set in practice, in addition to existing disease-specific standard sets for CVD may facilitate the provision of high-value work-focused healthcare for this patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":36660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","volume":"8 1","pages":"147"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11655757/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-024-00825-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To facilitate the maintenance or resumption of participation in work for patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD), there is a need for high-quality work-focused healthcare. According to the concept of value-based healthcare, quality of care can be enhanced by understanding the outcomes that matter most to patients. However, a major challenge in assessing quality of work-focused healthcare in practice is the lack of consensus on which work-related outcomes should be measured.

Objective: The objective of this study was to identify a standard set of key work-related outcomes for patients with CVD to be used in practice of work-focused healthcare in the Netherlands, including standardised outcome measures and associated case mix factors. This standard set is intended to assist occupational and other health professionals in delivering work-focused healthcare that meets a patient's individual needs regarding work participation, and to enhance patients' engagement in their own work-focused care process.

Methods: A 2-round RAND-modified Delphi process was conducted. The process included literature searches, consecutive research team meetings, and several meetings and rounds of voting by a working group. The working group consisted of patients with CVD (n = 6) and health professionals representing different stakeholders (n = 11) involved in work-focused healthcare for this patient population in the Netherlands. Consensus was reached over four phases: (1) establishing the scope of the standard set and defining the population, (2) prioritising and defining the outcome domains, (3) selecting the outcome measures for the most important domains, including clinical data and patient-reported data, and (4) selecting and defining case mix factors.

Results: A 23-item patient-reported questionnaire was developed, called the Value@WORK-Q23, including questions on nine work-related outcome domains considered most important for patients with CVD: (1) work participation, (2) physical work ability, (3) mental work ability, (4) suitable work, (5) support from the work environment, (6) flexibility of the work environment, (7) communication with the patient, (8) person-centredness, and (9) interdisciplinary communication. In addition, nine case mix variables was selected, comprising demographic-, disease-, and work factors.

Conclusions: The Value@WORK-Q23 provides guidance on measuring the most important work-related outcomes for patients with CVD. Using this work-related set in practice, in addition to existing disease-specific standard sets for CVD may facilitate the provision of high-value work-focused healthcare for this patient population.

开发一套标准的关键工作相关结果,用于心血管疾病患者的实践:一项修改的德尔菲研究。
背景:为了促进心血管疾病(CVD)患者维持或恢复参与工作,需要高质量的以工作为中心的医疗保健。根据基于价值的医疗保健的概念,可以通过了解对患者最重要的结果来提高护理质量。然而,在实践中评估以工作为重点的医疗保健质量的一个主要挑战是,对于应如何衡量与工作有关的结果缺乏共识。目的:本研究的目的是确定一套标准的CVD患者的关键工作相关结果,用于荷兰以工作为重点的医疗保健实践,包括标准化的结果测量和相关的病例混合因素。该标准集旨在帮助职业和其他卫生专业人员提供以工作为重点的医疗保健,以满足患者在工作参与方面的个人需求,并增强患者对自己以工作为重点的护理过程的参与。方法:采用2轮rand修正德尔菲法。这个过程包括文献检索,连续的研究小组会议,以及工作组的几次会议和投票。工作组由心血管疾病患者(n = 6)和代表不同利益相关者(n = 11)的卫生专业人员组成,这些利益相关者参与了荷兰针对这一患者群体的以工作为重点的医疗保健。在四个阶段达成了共识:(1)建立标准集的范围并定义人群;(2)确定结果领域的优先级并定义结果领域;(3)选择最重要领域的结果措施,包括临床数据和患者报告的数据;(4)选择和定义病例混合因素。结果:制定了一份由患者报告的23项问卷,名为Value@WORK-Q23,其中包括对心血管疾病患者最重要的九个与工作相关的结果领域的问题:(1)工作参与,(2)体力工作能力,(3)脑力工作能力,(4)合适的工作,(5)工作环境的支持,(6)工作环境的灵活性,(7)与患者的沟通,(8)以人为本,(9)跨学科沟通。此外,还选择了9个病例混合变量,包括人口、疾病和工作因素。结论:Value@WORK-Q23为测量心血管疾病患者最重要的工作相关结果提供了指导。除了现有的心血管疾病特定标准集之外,在实践中使用这一与工作相关的标准集可能有助于为这一患者群体提供高价值的以工作为重点的医疗保健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信