Assessing usability of electronic patient-reported outcome measures in older people with and without a rare dermatologic disorder.

IF 2.4 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Calvin N Ho, Anna Kündig, Lila Bahadori, Katy Roat, Rachel Bruce, Caroline P Goswami, Kimberly Kelly, Thomas Moll
{"title":"Assessing usability of electronic patient-reported outcome measures in older people with and without a rare dermatologic disorder.","authors":"Calvin N Ho, Anna Kündig, Lila Bahadori, Katy Roat, Rachel Bruce, Caroline P Goswami, Kimberly Kelly, Thomas Moll","doi":"10.1186/s41687-024-00821-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robust and well-defined data collection is important when using electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) in clinical studies. Questions have been raised as to whether older age may be a barrier to data collection due to patients' unfamiliarity with electronic devices. Older adults may also have underlying health conditions that affect their ability to fill out patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) on electronic devices. The aim of this observational, qualitative research study was to evaluate the usability of electronic PROMs (ePROMs) on a tablet and smartphone in older participants with and without bullous pemphigoid (BP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Older people with and without BP were recruited in the US and France. They participated in 60-min in-person interviews, with moderators observing their completion of various tasks, including ePROMs, using a tablet and smartphone. Participants were scored on ease of task completion using a scale from 1 to 5.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 participants were recruited (≥65 years old; six each with and without BP [all participants without BP were ≥75 years old]). Most participants (83%) could easily and confidently perform most assigned tasks on both the tablet and smartphone. Although select tasks required assistance, all participants were eventually able to complete all tasks. Overall, ePROM usability did not correlate with age, sex, country, or disease state. Feedback on the general usability of both electronic devices was largely positive, and most participants (n = 11; 92%) were willing to use them. Participants were generally pleased with the training modules offered on both devices, describing the training as sufficient, straightforward, and helpful. In total, 25 usability issues were identified, which fell into three categories: incomplete instructions, unclear language, and insufficient technical/visual design. Participants provided feedback on how to enhance device usability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results suggest that older people can confidently use a tablet or smartphone for ePROM completion, particularly with appropriate training. ePROMs should be designed with the needs of the target patient population in mind. These results can be leveraged to improve clinical data recording, optimize device usability, and enhance the user experience for older people and those with functional or physical limitations.</p>","PeriodicalId":36660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","volume":"8 1","pages":"145"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11655768/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-024-00821-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Robust and well-defined data collection is important when using electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) in clinical studies. Questions have been raised as to whether older age may be a barrier to data collection due to patients' unfamiliarity with electronic devices. Older adults may also have underlying health conditions that affect their ability to fill out patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) on electronic devices. The aim of this observational, qualitative research study was to evaluate the usability of electronic PROMs (ePROMs) on a tablet and smartphone in older participants with and without bullous pemphigoid (BP).

Methods: Older people with and without BP were recruited in the US and France. They participated in 60-min in-person interviews, with moderators observing their completion of various tasks, including ePROMs, using a tablet and smartphone. Participants were scored on ease of task completion using a scale from 1 to 5.

Results: A total of 12 participants were recruited (≥65 years old; six each with and without BP [all participants without BP were ≥75 years old]). Most participants (83%) could easily and confidently perform most assigned tasks on both the tablet and smartphone. Although select tasks required assistance, all participants were eventually able to complete all tasks. Overall, ePROM usability did not correlate with age, sex, country, or disease state. Feedback on the general usability of both electronic devices was largely positive, and most participants (n = 11; 92%) were willing to use them. Participants were generally pleased with the training modules offered on both devices, describing the training as sufficient, straightforward, and helpful. In total, 25 usability issues were identified, which fell into three categories: incomplete instructions, unclear language, and insufficient technical/visual design. Participants provided feedback on how to enhance device usability.

Conclusions: The results suggest that older people can confidently use a tablet or smartphone for ePROM completion, particularly with appropriate training. ePROMs should be designed with the needs of the target patient population in mind. These results can be leveraged to improve clinical data recording, optimize device usability, and enhance the user experience for older people and those with functional or physical limitations.

评估有或无罕见皮肤病的老年人电子患者报告结果测量的可用性。
背景:在临床研究中使用电子患者报告结果测量(ePROMs)时,稳健和定义明确的数据收集非常重要。人们提出的问题是,由于患者不熟悉电子设备,老年是否可能成为数据收集的障碍。老年人也可能有潜在的健康状况,影响他们在电子设备上填写患者报告结果测量(PROMs)的能力。本观察性定性研究的目的是评估平板电脑和智能手机上电子prom (eprom)在患有和不患有大疱性类天疱疮(BP)的老年参与者中的可用性。方法:在美国和法国招募有和无BP的老年人。他们参加了60分钟的面对面访谈,主持人观察他们使用平板电脑和智能手机完成各种任务,包括电子prom。参与者完成任务的难易程度按1到5分进行评分。结果:共招募了12名参与者(≥65岁;有BP和无BP各6例[所有无BP的参与者年龄≥75岁])。大多数参与者(83%)可以轻松自信地在平板电脑和智能手机上完成大多数分配的任务。虽然有些任务需要帮助,但所有参与者最终都能完成所有任务。总体而言,ePROM可用性与年龄、性别、国家或疾病状态无关。对这两种电子设备的总体可用性的反馈基本上是积极的,大多数参与者(n = 11;92%)愿意使用它们。参与者普遍对两种设备上提供的培训模块感到满意,认为培训是充分的、直接的和有用的。总共确定了25个可用性问题,分为三类:说明不完整、语言不清晰、技术/视觉设计不足。与会者就如何提高设备可用性提供了反馈。结论:结果表明老年人可以自信地使用平板电脑或智能手机完成ePROM,特别是在适当的训练下。eprom的设计应该考虑到目标患者群体的需求。这些结果可用于改善临床数据记录,优化设备可用性,并增强老年人和有功能或身体限制的人的用户体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信