Cost-effectiveness analysis of transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis at low risk of surgical mortality in Sweden.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Upsala journal of medical sciences Pub Date : 2024-11-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.48101/ujms.v129.10741
Konrad Nilsson, Stefan James, Oskar Angerås, Jenny Backes, Henrik Bjursten, Pascal Candolfi, Mattias Götberg, Henrik Hagström, Chiara Malmberg, Niels Erik Nielsen, Archita Sarmah, Magnus Settergren, Tom Bromilow
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness analysis of transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis at low risk of surgical mortality in Sweden.","authors":"Konrad Nilsson, Stefan James, Oskar Angerås, Jenny Backes, Henrik Bjursten, Pascal Candolfi, Mattias Götberg, Henrik Hagström, Chiara Malmberg, Niels Erik Nielsen, Archita Sarmah, Magnus Settergren, Tom Bromilow","doi":"10.48101/ujms.v129.10741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has shown similar or improved clinical outcomes compared with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis at low risk for surgical mortality. This cost-utility analysis compared TAVI with SAPIEN 3 versus SAVR in symptomatic severe aortic stenosis patients at low risk of surgical mortality from the perspective of the Swedish healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A published, two-stage, Markov-based cost-utility model that captured clinical outcomes from the <i>Swedish Web-system for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-based care in Heart disease Evaluated according to Recommended Therapies</i> (SWEDEHEART) registry (2018-2020) was adapted from the perspective of the Swedish healthcare system using local general population mortality, utility and costs data. The model had a lifetime horizon. Model outputs included changes in direct healthcare costs and health-related quality of life from using TAVI as compared with SAVR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TAVI with SAPIEN 3 resulted in lifetime costs per patient of 940,541 Swedish krona (SEK) and lifetime quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) per patient of 7.16, whilst SAVR resulted in lifetime costs and QALYs per patient of 821,380 SEK and 6.81 QALYs, respectively. Compared with SAVR, TAVI offered an incremental improvement of +0.35 QALY per patient at an increased cost of +119,161 SEK per patient over a lifetime horizon, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 343,918 SEK per QALY gained.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TAVI with SAPIEN 3 is a cost-effective option versus SAVR for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis at low risk for surgical mortality treated in the Swedish healthcare setting. These findings may inform policy decisions in Sweden for the management of this patient group.</p>","PeriodicalId":23458,"journal":{"name":"Upsala journal of medical sciences","volume":"129 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11650470/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Upsala journal of medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48101/ujms.v129.10741","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has shown similar or improved clinical outcomes compared with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis at low risk for surgical mortality. This cost-utility analysis compared TAVI with SAPIEN 3 versus SAVR in symptomatic severe aortic stenosis patients at low risk of surgical mortality from the perspective of the Swedish healthcare system.

Methods: A published, two-stage, Markov-based cost-utility model that captured clinical outcomes from the Swedish Web-system for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-based care in Heart disease Evaluated according to Recommended Therapies (SWEDEHEART) registry (2018-2020) was adapted from the perspective of the Swedish healthcare system using local general population mortality, utility and costs data. The model had a lifetime horizon. Model outputs included changes in direct healthcare costs and health-related quality of life from using TAVI as compared with SAVR.

Results: TAVI with SAPIEN 3 resulted in lifetime costs per patient of 940,541 Swedish krona (SEK) and lifetime quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) per patient of 7.16, whilst SAVR resulted in lifetime costs and QALYs per patient of 821,380 SEK and 6.81 QALYs, respectively. Compared with SAVR, TAVI offered an incremental improvement of +0.35 QALY per patient at an increased cost of +119,161 SEK per patient over a lifetime horizon, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 343,918 SEK per QALY gained.

Conclusion: TAVI with SAPIEN 3 is a cost-effective option versus SAVR for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis at low risk for surgical mortality treated in the Swedish healthcare setting. These findings may inform policy decisions in Sweden for the management of this patient group.

在瑞典,经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术在低手术死亡率的严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者中的成本-效果分析。
背景:经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)与外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)相比,在有症状的严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者中,经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)显示出相似或改善的临床结果,手术死亡率低。从瑞典医疗保健系统的角度,本成本-效用分析比较了TAVI、SAPIEN 3和SAVR在低手术死亡率的症状性严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者中的应用。方法:从瑞典医疗保健系统的角度,利用当地一般人群死亡率、效用和成本数据,对瑞典根据推荐疗法评估的心脏病循证护理增强和发展网络系统(SWEDEHEART)注册(2018-2020)中已发表的两阶段马尔可夫成本效用模型进行了调整。这个模型有一个终生的视界。模型输出包括与SAVR相比,使用TAVI导致的直接医疗保健成本和健康相关生活质量的变化。结果:使用SAPIEN 3的TAVI导致每位患者的终生成本为940,541瑞典克朗(SEK),每位患者的终生质量调整生命年(QALYs)为7.16,而SAVR导致每位患者的终生成本和QALYs分别为821,380瑞典克朗和6.81 QALYs。与SAVR相比,TAVI为每位患者提供了+0.35 QALY的增量改善,每位患者在整个生命周期内的成本增加了+119,161瑞典克朗,导致每个QALY获得的增量成本-效果比为343,918瑞典克朗。结论:与SAVR相比,在瑞典医疗机构治疗的有症状的严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者手术死亡风险较低,TAVI联合SAPIEN 3是一种经济有效的选择。这些发现可能为瑞典管理这一患者群体的政策决策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Upsala journal of medical sciences
Upsala journal of medical sciences 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences is published for the Upsala Medical Society. It has been published since 1865 and is one of the oldest medical journals in Sweden. The journal publishes clinical and experimental original works in the medical field. Although focusing on regional issues, the journal always welcomes contributions from outside Sweden. Specially extended issues are published occasionally, dealing with special topics, congress proceedings and academic dissertations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信