Should patients with encrusted JJ stents involving the proximal/renal loop undergo primarily endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery?

IF 1.4 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Alexandra Rocha, Gonçalo Mendes, Sofia Mesquita, Mariana Madanelo, João Vital, Miguel Marques-Monteiro, Nuno Vinagre, Martinha Magalhães, Beatriz Oliveira, Guilherme Gonçalves, Vítor Cavadas, Avelino Fraga
{"title":"Should patients with encrusted JJ stents involving the proximal/renal loop undergo primarily endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery?","authors":"Alexandra Rocha, Gonçalo Mendes, Sofia Mesquita, Mariana Madanelo, João Vital, Miguel Marques-Monteiro, Nuno Vinagre, Martinha Magalhães, Beatriz Oliveira, Guilherme Gonçalves, Vítor Cavadas, Avelino Fraga","doi":"10.4081/aiua.2024.13163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ureteral stents are one of the most used devices in Urology, allowing drainage of the upper urinary system, and can be used either in elective or emergency procedures. However, as a foreign body inside the urinary system, they are subject to encrustation. Encrustation is one of the burdens seen with double-J stents and, to date, there is no consensus about its best management. This study aims to prove that Endoscopic Combined Intra-Renal Surgery (ECIRS) is the best choice when there's an encrusted proximal loop of a ureteral stent.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with an encrusted proximal loop of the ureteral stent who underwent surgery at a single center, comparing ECIRS with other procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between July 2011 and June of 2024, 33 patients (18 females and 15 males) were submitted to surgery. The median indwelling time of the stent was 11 (8-19) months and a stentfree rate of 100% was achieved. The authors demonstrated a significant stone-free rate of 61.1% following ECIRS compared to merely 20% with other procedures (p = 0.023). Notably, while the complication rate was low across all procedures, the ECIRS group exhibited fewer complications (5.6%) than those undergoing alternate techniques (13.3%), though this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.439).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study advocates for ECIRS as the preferred initial treatment for encrusted proximal ureteral stents, as it facilitates superior stone clearance, minimizes complications, and maintains comparable operative efficiency. This research contributes valuable insights into the management of challenging cases involving encrusted ureteral stents, calling for future studies to further validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":46900,"journal":{"name":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","volume":"96 4","pages":"13163"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2024.13163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ureteral stents are one of the most used devices in Urology, allowing drainage of the upper urinary system, and can be used either in elective or emergency procedures. However, as a foreign body inside the urinary system, they are subject to encrustation. Encrustation is one of the burdens seen with double-J stents and, to date, there is no consensus about its best management. This study aims to prove that Endoscopic Combined Intra-Renal Surgery (ECIRS) is the best choice when there's an encrusted proximal loop of a ureteral stent.

Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with an encrusted proximal loop of the ureteral stent who underwent surgery at a single center, comparing ECIRS with other procedures.

Results: Between July 2011 and June of 2024, 33 patients (18 females and 15 males) were submitted to surgery. The median indwelling time of the stent was 11 (8-19) months and a stentfree rate of 100% was achieved. The authors demonstrated a significant stone-free rate of 61.1% following ECIRS compared to merely 20% with other procedures (p = 0.023). Notably, while the complication rate was low across all procedures, the ECIRS group exhibited fewer complications (5.6%) than those undergoing alternate techniques (13.3%), though this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.439).

Conclusions: Our study advocates for ECIRS as the preferred initial treatment for encrusted proximal ureteral stents, as it facilitates superior stone clearance, minimizes complications, and maintains comparable operative efficiency. This research contributes valuable insights into the management of challenging cases involving encrusted ureteral stents, calling for future studies to further validate these findings.

累及近端/肾袢的结痂JJ支架患者是否应主要接受内镜联合肾内手术?
背景:输尿管支架是泌尿外科中使用最多的装置之一,它可以引流上泌尿系统,可用于选择性或急诊手术。然而,作为泌尿系统内的异物,它们容易结痂。结痂是双j型支架的负担之一,迄今为止,对其最佳管理尚无共识。本研究旨在证明内镜联合肾内手术(ECIRS)是输尿管支架近端袢结痂时的最佳选择。方法:作者进行了一项回顾性队列研究,对在单中心接受手术的输尿管支架近端环结痂的患者进行了比较,并将ECIRS与其他手术进行了比较。结果:2011年7月至2024年6月,共收治33例患者,其中女性18例,男性15例。支架中位留置时间为11(8-19)个月,支架无支架率为100%。作者证明,ECIRS后结石无结石率为61.1%,而其他手术仅为20% (p = 0.023)。值得注意的是,虽然所有手术的并发症发生率都很低,但ECIRS组的并发症发生率(5.6%)低于其他手术组(13.3%),尽管这种差异没有统计学意义(p = 0.439)。结论:我们的研究提倡将ECIRS作为输尿管近端结痂支架的首选初始治疗,因为它有助于更好的结石清除,减少并发症,并保持相当的手术效率。本研究为输尿管嵌套支架的治疗提供了有价值的见解,需要进一步的研究来验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
35.70%
发文量
72
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信