Hong Qi Tan, Kah Seng Lew, Calvin Wei Yang Koh, Kang Hao Lee, Clifford Ghee Ann Chua, Andrew Wibawa, Zubin Master, James Cheow Lei Lee, Sung Yong Park
{"title":"Denoising proton reference dosimetry spectrum using a large area ionization chamber - physical basis and type A uncertainty.","authors":"Hong Qi Tan, Kah Seng Lew, Calvin Wei Yang Koh, Kang Hao Lee, Clifford Ghee Ann Chua, Andrew Wibawa, Zubin Master, James Cheow Lei Lee, Sung Yong Park","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/ada085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>
Reference dosimetry measurement in a pencil beam scanning system can exhibit dose fluctuation due to intra-spill spot positional drift. This results in a noisy reference dosimetry measurement against energy which could introduce errors in monitor unit calibration. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of smoothing the reference dosimetry measurements on the type A uncertainty.
Methods:
The reference dosimetry measurement (D_w/MU) with a PTW 34045 advanced Markus chamber placed at 2 cm depth and a 10 x 10 cm^2 scanned field are performed for 98 energy layers on five non-consecutive days using a water tank. The PTW 34089 large area ionization chamber (LAIC) is placed at the same depth and the charges are measured with a single spot irradiation (M_spot^LAIC). (D_w/MU) and M_spot^LAIC are fitted with a linear and quadratic function to obtain a smooth plot of (D_w/MU) against the proton energy (reference dosimetry curve). Type A uncertainty of the measured reference dosimetry curve is compared against the de-noised fitted curve. 
Results:
The repeatability of reference dosimetry measurement shows relative difference of up to 2.3% across the five days. The linear and quadratic fits between LAIC charges and the (D_w/MU) from PTW 34045 show a high R^2 values of more than 0.95. The maximum type A uncertainty of the de-noised reference dosimetry curve is lower (0.69% at 70.2 MeV) compared to the measured one (0.88% at 77.5 MeV). However, the average type A uncertainty of the denoised curve across all energies is higher compared to the measurements (0.50% versus 0.43%).
Conclusion:
We have presented the physical basis and procedure for fitting the charges measured with a LAIC to the reference dosimetry curve. The fitted reference dosimetry curve avoids large error in any energy layer but increases the average type A uncertainty across energies and should be used with caution. 


.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ada085","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective:
Reference dosimetry measurement in a pencil beam scanning system can exhibit dose fluctuation due to intra-spill spot positional drift. This results in a noisy reference dosimetry measurement against energy which could introduce errors in monitor unit calibration. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of smoothing the reference dosimetry measurements on the type A uncertainty.
Methods:
The reference dosimetry measurement (D_w/MU) with a PTW 34045 advanced Markus chamber placed at 2 cm depth and a 10 x 10 cm^2 scanned field are performed for 98 energy layers on five non-consecutive days using a water tank. The PTW 34089 large area ionization chamber (LAIC) is placed at the same depth and the charges are measured with a single spot irradiation (M_spot^LAIC). (D_w/MU) and M_spot^LAIC are fitted with a linear and quadratic function to obtain a smooth plot of (D_w/MU) against the proton energy (reference dosimetry curve). Type A uncertainty of the measured reference dosimetry curve is compared against the de-noised fitted curve.
Results:
The repeatability of reference dosimetry measurement shows relative difference of up to 2.3% across the five days. The linear and quadratic fits between LAIC charges and the (D_w/MU) from PTW 34045 show a high R^2 values of more than 0.95. The maximum type A uncertainty of the de-noised reference dosimetry curve is lower (0.69% at 70.2 MeV) compared to the measured one (0.88% at 77.5 MeV). However, the average type A uncertainty of the denoised curve across all energies is higher compared to the measurements (0.50% versus 0.43%).
Conclusion:
We have presented the physical basis and procedure for fitting the charges measured with a LAIC to the reference dosimetry curve. The fitted reference dosimetry curve avoids large error in any energy layer but increases the average type A uncertainty across energies and should be used with caution.
.
期刊介绍:
The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry