Denoising proton reference dosimetry spectrum using a large area ionization chamber-physical basis and type A uncertainty.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Hong Qi Tan, Kah Seng Lew, Calvin Wei Yang Koh, Kang Hao Lee, Clifford Ghee Ann Chua, Andrew Wibawa, Zubin Master, James Cheow Lei Lee, Sung Yong Park
{"title":"Denoising proton reference dosimetry spectrum using a large area ionization chamber-physical basis and type A uncertainty.","authors":"Hong Qi Tan, Kah Seng Lew, Calvin Wei Yang Koh, Kang Hao Lee, Clifford Ghee Ann Chua, Andrew Wibawa, Zubin Master, James Cheow Lei Lee, Sung Yong Park","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/ada085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>Reference dosimetry measurement in a pencil beam scanning system can exhibit dose fluctuation due to intra-spill spot positional drift. This results in a noisy reference dosimetry measurement against energy which could introduce errors in monitor unit calibration. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of smoothing the reference dosimetry measurements on the type A uncertainty.<i>Methods.</i>The reference dosimetry measurement (Dw/MU)with a PTW 34045 advanced Markus chamber placed at 2 cm depth and a 10 × 10cm2scanned field are performed for 98 energy layers on five non-consecutive days using a water tank. The PTW 34089 large area ionization chamber (LAIC) is placed at the same depth and the charges are measured with a single spot irradiation (MspotLAIC). (Dw/MU)andMspotLAICare fitted with a linear and quadratic function to obtain a smooth plot of (Dw/MU)against the proton energy (reference dosimetry curve). Type A uncertainty of the measured reference dosimetry curve is compared against the de-noised fitted curve.<i>Results.</i>The repeatability of reference dosimetry measurement shows relative difference of up to 2.3% across the five days. The linear and quadratic fits between LAIC charges and the (Dw/MU)from PTW 34045 show a highR2values of more than 0.95. The maximum type A uncertainty of the de-noised reference dosimetry curve is lower (0.69% at 70.2 MeV) compared to the measured one (0.88% at 77.5 MeV). However, the average type A uncertainty of the denoised curve across all energies is higher compared to the measurements (0.50% versus 0.43%).<i>Conclusion.</i>We have presented the physical basis and procedure for fitting the charges measured with a LAIC to the reference dosimetry curve. The fitted reference dosimetry curve avoids large error in any energy layer but increases the average type A uncertainty across energies and should be used with caution.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ada085","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective.Reference dosimetry measurement in a pencil beam scanning system can exhibit dose fluctuation due to intra-spill spot positional drift. This results in a noisy reference dosimetry measurement against energy which could introduce errors in monitor unit calibration. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of smoothing the reference dosimetry measurements on the type A uncertainty.Methods.The reference dosimetry measurement (Dw/MU)with a PTW 34045 advanced Markus chamber placed at 2 cm depth and a 10 × 10cm2scanned field are performed for 98 energy layers on five non-consecutive days using a water tank. The PTW 34089 large area ionization chamber (LAIC) is placed at the same depth and the charges are measured with a single spot irradiation (MspotLAIC). (Dw/MU)andMspotLAICare fitted with a linear and quadratic function to obtain a smooth plot of (Dw/MU)against the proton energy (reference dosimetry curve). Type A uncertainty of the measured reference dosimetry curve is compared against the de-noised fitted curve.Results.The repeatability of reference dosimetry measurement shows relative difference of up to 2.3% across the five days. The linear and quadratic fits between LAIC charges and the (Dw/MU)from PTW 34045 show a highR2values of more than 0.95. The maximum type A uncertainty of the de-noised reference dosimetry curve is lower (0.69% at 70.2 MeV) compared to the measured one (0.88% at 77.5 MeV). However, the average type A uncertainty of the denoised curve across all energies is higher compared to the measurements (0.50% versus 0.43%).Conclusion.We have presented the physical basis and procedure for fitting the charges measured with a LAIC to the reference dosimetry curve. The fitted reference dosimetry curve avoids large error in any energy layer but increases the average type A uncertainty across energies and should be used with caution.

用大面积电离室去噪质子参考剂量谱-物理基础和a型不确定度。
目的:铅笔束扫描系统中的参考剂量测量会由于泄漏点位置漂移而出现剂量波动。这将导致对能量的参考剂量测量产生噪声,从而在监测单元校准中引入误差。本研究的目的是探讨平滑参考剂量测量值对A型不确定度的影响。方法:使用PTW 34045先进Markus腔在2 cm深度和10 x 10 cm^2扫描场进行参考剂量测量(D_w/MU),使用水箱进行了5天非连续的98个能量层。将PTW 34089大面积电离室(LAIC)置于同一深度,采用单点辐照(M_spot^LAIC)测量电荷。(D_w/MU)和M_spot^ lac分别用线性和二次函数拟合得到(D_w/MU)与质子能量(参考剂量曲线)的平滑图。将测量的参考剂量曲线的A型不确定度与去噪的拟合曲线进行比较。结果:参考剂量测定的重复性在5天内显示出高达2.3%的相对差异。LAIC电荷与PTW 34045的(D_w/MU)之间的线性和二次拟合显示R^2值大于0.95。去噪参考剂量曲线的最大A型不确定度在70.2 MeV时为0.69%,低于实测曲线(77.5 MeV时为0.88%)。然而,与测量值相比,去噪曲线在所有能量上的平均A型不确定度更高(0.50%对0.43%)。结论:我们提出了用LAIC测量的电荷与参考剂量测定曲线拟合的物理基础和程序。拟合的参考剂量曲线避免了任何能量层的大误差,但增加了跨能量的平均A型不确定度,应谨慎使用。& # xD; & # xD; & # xD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physics in medicine and biology
Physics in medicine and biology 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
409
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信