Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block Versus Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) in Pediatric Hip Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Controlled Trial.

IF 1.4 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1097/BPO.0000000000002882
Malgorzata Reysner, Tomasz Reysner, Piotr Janusz, Grzegorz Kowalski, Milud Shadi, Przemysław Daroszewski, Katarzyna Wieczorowska-Tobis, Tomasz Kotwicki
{"title":"Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block Versus Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) in Pediatric Hip Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Controlled Trial.","authors":"Malgorzata Reysner, Tomasz Reysner, Piotr Janusz, Grzegorz Kowalski, Milud Shadi, Przemysław Daroszewski, Katarzyna Wieczorowska-Tobis, Tomasz Kotwicki","doi":"10.1097/BPO.0000000000002882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effectiveness and safety of the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and lumbar erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in pediatric hip surgeries is limited mainly to case reports. This study assessed the efficacy of ultrasound-guided PENG block versus lumbar ESPB under spinal anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety patients aged 2 to 7 years, ASA I-III scheduled for hip surgery were randomly assigned to 3 equal groups, each receiving the PENG block group (n=30), the ESPB group (n=30), or the control group (n=30). After the spinal anesthesia, the block was performed with 0.5 kg/mL of 0.2% ropivacaine. The primary outcome was the pain scores (FLACC) 48 hours after surgery. The secondary outcomes included postoperative FLACC pain scores, neutrophile-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and total opioid consumption.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FLACC score was significantly lower in the lumbar ESPB and PENG groups compared with the control group ( P <0.0001) at all time points. The NLR and PLR levels were substantially lower in the PENG and lumbar ESPB groups ( P <0.0001) compared with the control group. The NLR and PLR levels were significantly lower in the PENG and lumbar ESPB groups compared with the control group ( P <0.0001). The total opioid consumption was significantly lower in the PENG and lumbar ESPB groups compared with the control group ( P <0.0001). Forty-three percent of children in the PENG group and 50% of children in the lumbar ESPB group did not require opioids postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PENG block and the lumbar ESPB provide efficient postoperative analgesia in children undergoing hip surgery. The PENG block and lumbar ESPB lower cumulative opioid consumption and the stress response to surgery, expressed by NLR and PLR levels.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level I.</p>","PeriodicalId":16945,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":"e324-e330"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11875410/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000002882","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The effectiveness and safety of the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and lumbar erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in pediatric hip surgeries is limited mainly to case reports. This study assessed the efficacy of ultrasound-guided PENG block versus lumbar ESPB under spinal anesthesia.

Methods: Ninety patients aged 2 to 7 years, ASA I-III scheduled for hip surgery were randomly assigned to 3 equal groups, each receiving the PENG block group (n=30), the ESPB group (n=30), or the control group (n=30). After the spinal anesthesia, the block was performed with 0.5 kg/mL of 0.2% ropivacaine. The primary outcome was the pain scores (FLACC) 48 hours after surgery. The secondary outcomes included postoperative FLACC pain scores, neutrophile-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and total opioid consumption.

Results: The FLACC score was significantly lower in the lumbar ESPB and PENG groups compared with the control group ( P <0.0001) at all time points. The NLR and PLR levels were substantially lower in the PENG and lumbar ESPB groups ( P <0.0001) compared with the control group. The NLR and PLR levels were significantly lower in the PENG and lumbar ESPB groups compared with the control group ( P <0.0001). The total opioid consumption was significantly lower in the PENG and lumbar ESPB groups compared with the control group ( P <0.0001). Forty-three percent of children in the PENG group and 50% of children in the lumbar ESPB group did not require opioids postoperatively.

Conclusions: The PENG block and the lumbar ESPB provide efficient postoperative analgesia in children undergoing hip surgery. The PENG block and lumbar ESPB lower cumulative opioid consumption and the stress response to surgery, expressed by NLR and PLR levels.

Level of evidence: Level I.

小儿髋关节手术中囊周神经组(PENG)阻滞与腰竖肌脊柱平面阻滞(ESPB):一项随机、双盲、对照试验。
背景:小儿髋关节手术中应用囊周神经群(PENG)阻滞和腰竖肌脊柱平面阻滞(ESPB)的有效性和安全性主要局限于病例报道。本研究评估了超声引导下彭阻滞与腰椎ESPB在脊髓麻醉下的疗效。方法:90例2 ~ 7岁ASA I-III期髋关节手术患者随机分为3组,分别接受PENG阻滞组(n=30)、ESPB组(n=30)和对照组(n=30)。脊髓麻醉后,以0.5 kg/mL 0.2%罗哌卡因阻滞。主要观察指标为术后48小时疼痛评分(FLACC)。次要结果包括术后FLACC疼痛评分、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比率(PLR)和总阿片类药物消耗。结果:与对照组相比,腰椎ESPB组和PENG组的FLACC评分显著降低(结论:PENG阻滞和腰椎ESPB对髋关节手术儿童术后镇痛有效。彭阻滞和腰椎ESPB降低累积阿片类药物消耗和手术应激反应,通过NLR和PLR水平表达。证据等级:一级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
17.60%
发文量
512
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: ​Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics is a leading journal that focuses specifically on traumatic injuries to give you hands-on on coverage of a fast-growing field. You''ll get articles that cover everything from the nature of injury to the effects of new drug therapies; everything from recommendations for more effective surgical approaches to the latest laboratory findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信