Novel dilation-erosion labeling technique allows for rapid, accurate and adjustable alignment measurements in primary TKA.

IF 7 2区 医学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Aleksander P Mika, Yehyun Suh, Robert W Elrod, Martin Faschingbauer, Daniel C Moyer, J Ryan Martin
{"title":"Novel dilation-erosion labeling technique allows for rapid, accurate and adjustable alignment measurements in primary TKA.","authors":"Aleksander P Mika, Yehyun Suh, Robert W Elrod, Martin Faschingbauer, Daniel C Moyer, J Ryan Martin","doi":"10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Optimal implant position and alignment remains a controversial, yet critical topic in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Future study of ideal implant position will require the ability to efficiently measure component positions at scale. Previous algorithms have limited accuracy, do not allow for human oversight and correction in deployment, and require extensive training time and dataset. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to develop and validate a machine learning model that can accurately automate, with surgeon directed adjustment, implant position annotation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective series of 295 primary TKAs was identified. The femoral-tibial angle (FTA), distal femoral angle (dFA), and proximal tibial angle (pTA) were manually annotated from the immediate short leg post-op radiograph. We then trained a neural network to predict each annotated landmark using a novel label augmentation procedure of dilation, reweighting, and scheduled erosion steps. The model was compared against diverse models and accuracy was assessed using a validation set of 43 patients and test set of 79 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our proposed model significantly improves accuracy compared to baseline training models across all measures in ten out of eleven cases (p < 1e-22 for each measure). The mean absolute error (difference from manual annotation) was 0.65° for FTA, 1.62° for dFA, and 1.44° for pTA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Utilizing a novel algorithm, trained on a limited dataset, the accuracy of component position was approximately 1.2°. Additionally, the model outputs adjustable points from which the angles are calculated, allowing for clinician oversight and interpretable diagnostics for failure cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":10578,"journal":{"name":"Computers in biology and medicine","volume":"185 ","pages":"109571"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in biology and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109571","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Optimal implant position and alignment remains a controversial, yet critical topic in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Future study of ideal implant position will require the ability to efficiently measure component positions at scale. Previous algorithms have limited accuracy, do not allow for human oversight and correction in deployment, and require extensive training time and dataset. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to develop and validate a machine learning model that can accurately automate, with surgeon directed adjustment, implant position annotation.

Methods: A retrospective series of 295 primary TKAs was identified. The femoral-tibial angle (FTA), distal femoral angle (dFA), and proximal tibial angle (pTA) were manually annotated from the immediate short leg post-op radiograph. We then trained a neural network to predict each annotated landmark using a novel label augmentation procedure of dilation, reweighting, and scheduled erosion steps. The model was compared against diverse models and accuracy was assessed using a validation set of 43 patients and test set of 79 patients.

Results: Our proposed model significantly improves accuracy compared to baseline training models across all measures in ten out of eleven cases (p < 1e-22 for each measure). The mean absolute error (difference from manual annotation) was 0.65° for FTA, 1.62° for dFA, and 1.44° for pTA.

Conclusion: Utilizing a novel algorithm, trained on a limited dataset, the accuracy of component position was approximately 1.2°. Additionally, the model outputs adjustable points from which the angles are calculated, allowing for clinician oversight and interpretable diagnostics for failure cases.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers in biology and medicine
Computers in biology and medicine 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
10.40%
发文量
1086
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Biology and Medicine is an international forum for sharing groundbreaking advancements in the use of computers in bioscience and medicine. This journal serves as a medium for communicating essential research, instruction, ideas, and information regarding the rapidly evolving field of computer applications in these domains. By encouraging the exchange of knowledge, we aim to facilitate progress and innovation in the utilization of computers in biology and medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信