Interference of titanium and zirconia implants on dental-dedicated magnetic resonance image quality: ex vivo and in vivo assessment.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
K M Johannsen, J Christensen, L H Matzen, B Hansen, R Spin-Neto
{"title":"Interference of titanium and zirconia implants on dental-dedicated magnetic resonance image quality: ex vivo and in vivo assessment.","authors":"K M Johannsen, J Christensen, L H Matzen, B Hansen, R Spin-Neto","doi":"10.1093/dmfr/twae071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the impact of titanium and zirconia implants on dental-dedicated MR image (ddMRI) quality ex vivo (magnetic field distortion, MFD) and in vivo (artefacts).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>ddMR images were acquired (MAGNETOM Free.Max, 0.55 T, Siemens Healthineers AG, Forchheim, Germany) using a dental-dedicated coil (Rapid Biomedical, Rimpar Germany). Ex vivo: three phantoms were manufactured: one agar-embedded titanium implant, one agar-embedded zirconia implant, and one control phantom (agar 1.5%). Field-map analysis of images acquired at 0.55 T, 1.5 T and 3.0 T (MAGNETOM Sola and MAGNETOM Lumina, respectively, Siemens Healthineers AG, Forchheim, Germany) was done to illustrate the extent and severity of MFD caused by the implants. In vivo (0.55 T only): a splint was designed to serve as implant carrier allowing diverse implant positions (0, 1, 2, or 5 implants). A volunteer was imaged using multiple pulse sequences. Three blinded observers scored the images twice for the presence, severity, and type of artefacts, illustrated by descriptive statistics and inter- and intra-observer reproducibility (kappa statistics).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ex vivo: titanium produced more severe MFD than zirconia. MFD extent and amplitude increased with field strength (0.55 T < 1.5 T < 3.0 T). In vivo: titanium produced more artefacts than zirconia, generally as signal voids in tooth crowns close to implants. Inter- and intra-observer reproducibility ranged from 0.28-0.64, and 0.32-0.57, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prevalence of artefacts increased with magnetic field strength. Titanium generated larger MFD than zirconia. For both materials, artefacts were visible mainly in the crown area. Observer reproducibility needs improvement by dedicated ddMRI training.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twae071","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To assess the impact of titanium and zirconia implants on dental-dedicated MR image (ddMRI) quality ex vivo (magnetic field distortion, MFD) and in vivo (artefacts).

Material and methods: ddMR images were acquired (MAGNETOM Free.Max, 0.55 T, Siemens Healthineers AG, Forchheim, Germany) using a dental-dedicated coil (Rapid Biomedical, Rimpar Germany). Ex vivo: three phantoms were manufactured: one agar-embedded titanium implant, one agar-embedded zirconia implant, and one control phantom (agar 1.5%). Field-map analysis of images acquired at 0.55 T, 1.5 T and 3.0 T (MAGNETOM Sola and MAGNETOM Lumina, respectively, Siemens Healthineers AG, Forchheim, Germany) was done to illustrate the extent and severity of MFD caused by the implants. In vivo (0.55 T only): a splint was designed to serve as implant carrier allowing diverse implant positions (0, 1, 2, or 5 implants). A volunteer was imaged using multiple pulse sequences. Three blinded observers scored the images twice for the presence, severity, and type of artefacts, illustrated by descriptive statistics and inter- and intra-observer reproducibility (kappa statistics).

Results: Ex vivo: titanium produced more severe MFD than zirconia. MFD extent and amplitude increased with field strength (0.55 T < 1.5 T < 3.0 T). In vivo: titanium produced more artefacts than zirconia, generally as signal voids in tooth crowns close to implants. Inter- and intra-observer reproducibility ranged from 0.28-0.64, and 0.32-0.57, respectively.

Conclusion: The prevalence of artefacts increased with magnetic field strength. Titanium generated larger MFD than zirconia. For both materials, artefacts were visible mainly in the crown area. Observer reproducibility needs improvement by dedicated ddMRI training.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
65
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging. Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology. The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919 - Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks - Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks - Open access option - ISSN: 0250-832X - eISSN: 1476-542X
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信