Bridging the Gap: Examining Student Engagement in a Hybrid POGIL General Chemistry Class

IF 2.5 3区 教育学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Shaghayegh Fateh, Zubeyde Demet Kirbulut Gunes, Aspen Malone, Gabriella Cote, Amy J. Phelps, Ryleigh N. Porter and Gregory T. Rushton*, 
{"title":"Bridging the Gap: Examining Student Engagement in a Hybrid POGIL General Chemistry Class","authors":"Shaghayegh Fateh,&nbsp;Zubeyde Demet Kirbulut Gunes,&nbsp;Aspen Malone,&nbsp;Gabriella Cote,&nbsp;Amy J. Phelps,&nbsp;Ryleigh N. Porter and Gregory T. Rushton*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c0079110.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >In today’s educational system, distance learning has become a prominent instructional method. Despite its prevalence, concerns linger regarding its efficacy in effectively engaging students. A hybrid class utilizing Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) activities was examined, with students participating in person for half of the classes and participating remotely for the other half. The class was arranged such that, on any given day, approximately half of the students attended class in person and the other half joined remotely. Through an analysis of students’ interactions and conversations, the study’s design aimed to gauge the impact of active learning on the same students in two different environments. We observed discourse frequency and key discursive moves in both learning environments which were consistent with the substantive engagement expected in a student-centered experience. Despite all students at times being both in-person and remote learners engaging in group interactions, students demonstrated an overall lower level of engagement in group conversations when participating remotely. These results demonstrated the influence of transactional distance which posits that a psychological and communicative divide exists between students and instructors in distance education. Interviews with the course instructor and select students shed light on potential factors influencing this difference in engagement including increased distractions, reduced accountability, and a perceived lack of community among remote learners. Acknowledging the influence of individual differences such as personality, emotions, and attitude toward the course, the study also identified certain students who deviated from the overall participation patterns. Some learners exhibited heightened engagement in discussions when remote, in contradiction to the overall trend. Implications for supporting student engagement in hybrid learning environments are considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":43,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Education","volume":"101 12","pages":"5147–5159 5147–5159"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Education","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00791","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In today’s educational system, distance learning has become a prominent instructional method. Despite its prevalence, concerns linger regarding its efficacy in effectively engaging students. A hybrid class utilizing Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) activities was examined, with students participating in person for half of the classes and participating remotely for the other half. The class was arranged such that, on any given day, approximately half of the students attended class in person and the other half joined remotely. Through an analysis of students’ interactions and conversations, the study’s design aimed to gauge the impact of active learning on the same students in two different environments. We observed discourse frequency and key discursive moves in both learning environments which were consistent with the substantive engagement expected in a student-centered experience. Despite all students at times being both in-person and remote learners engaging in group interactions, students demonstrated an overall lower level of engagement in group conversations when participating remotely. These results demonstrated the influence of transactional distance which posits that a psychological and communicative divide exists between students and instructors in distance education. Interviews with the course instructor and select students shed light on potential factors influencing this difference in engagement including increased distractions, reduced accountability, and a perceived lack of community among remote learners. Acknowledging the influence of individual differences such as personality, emotions, and attitude toward the course, the study also identified certain students who deviated from the overall participation patterns. Some learners exhibited heightened engagement in discussions when remote, in contradiction to the overall trend. Implications for supporting student engagement in hybrid learning environments are considered.

Abstract Image

在当今的教育体系中,远程学习已成为一种重要的教学方法。尽管远程教学十分盛行,但人们对其能否有效吸引学生的关注却一直存在。我们研究了一个利用过程导向探究学习(POGIL)活动的混合班级,其中一半课程学生亲自参加,另一半课程学生远程参与。课堂的安排是,在任何一天,大约一半的学生亲自上课,另一半学生远程上课。通过分析学生的互动和对话,本研究的设计旨在衡量主动学习在两种不同环境下对同一学生的影响。我们观察了两种学习环境中的话语频率和关键话语动作,这与以学生为中心的体验中所期望的实质性参与是一致的。尽管所有学生有时既是现场学习者又是远程学习者,都参与了小组互动,但学生在远程参与小组对话时的参与度总体较低。这些结果表明了交易距离的影响,即在远程教育中,学生和教师之间存在着心理和交流上的鸿沟。对课程教师和部分学生的访谈揭示了影响这种参与度差异的潜在因素,包括分心现象增多、责任感降低以及远程学习者缺乏集体感。考虑到个性、情绪和对课程的态度等个体差异的影响,研究还发现了某些偏离整体参与模式的学生。一些学习者在远程学习时表现出更高的讨论参与度,这与整体趋势相悖。本研究探讨了在混合学习环境中支持学生参与的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Education
Journal of Chemical Education 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Education is the official journal of the Division of Chemical Education of the American Chemical Society, co-published with the American Chemical Society Publications Division. Launched in 1924, the Journal of Chemical Education is the world’s premier chemical education journal. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles and related information as a resource to those in the field of chemical education and to those institutions that serve them. JCE typically addresses chemical content, activities, laboratory experiments, instructional methods, and pedagogies. The Journal serves as a means of communication among people across the world who are interested in the teaching and learning of chemistry. This includes instructors of chemistry from middle school through graduate school, professional staff who support these teaching activities, as well as some scientists in commerce, industry, and government.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信