Patterns and drivers of excess mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic in 13 Western European countries.

Simon Galmiche, Camille Coustaury, Kelly Charniga, Rebecca Grant, Simon Cauchemez, Arnaud Fontanet
{"title":"Patterns and drivers of excess mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic in 13 Western European countries.","authors":"Simon Galmiche, Camille Coustaury, Kelly Charniga, Rebecca Grant, Simon Cauchemez, Arnaud Fontanet","doi":"10.1186/s44263-024-00103-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Important differences in excess mortality between European countries during the COVID-19 pandemic have been reported. Understanding the drivers of these differences is essential to pandemic preparedness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined patterns in age- and sex-standardized cumulative excess mortality in 13 Western European countries during the first 30 months of the COVID-19 pandemic and the correlation of country-level characteristics of interest with excess mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a timeline analysis, we identified notable differences in seeding events, particularly in early 2020 and when the Alpha variant emerged, likely contributing to notable differences in excess mortality between countries (lowest in Denmark during that period). These differences were more limited from July 2021 onwards. Lower excess mortality was associated with implementing stringent non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) when hospital admissions were still low in 2020 (correlation coefficient rho = 0.65, p = 0.03) and rapid rollout of vaccines in the elderly in early 2021 (rho =  - 0.76, p = 0.002). Countries which implemented NPIs while hospital admissions were low tended to experience lower gross domestic product (GDP) losses in 2020 (rho =  - 0.55, p = 0.08). Structural factors, such as high trust in the national government (rho =  - 0.77, p = 0.002) and low ratio of population at risk of poverty (rho = 0.55, p = 0.05), were also associated with lower excess mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results suggest the benefit of early implementation of NPIs and swift rollout of vaccines to the most vulnerable. Further analyses are required at a more granular level to better understand how these factors impacted excess mortality and help guide pandemic preparedness plans.</p>","PeriodicalId":519903,"journal":{"name":"BMC global and public health","volume":"2 1","pages":"78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11626765/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC global and public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44263-024-00103-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Important differences in excess mortality between European countries during the COVID-19 pandemic have been reported. Understanding the drivers of these differences is essential to pandemic preparedness.

Methods: We examined patterns in age- and sex-standardized cumulative excess mortality in 13 Western European countries during the first 30 months of the COVID-19 pandemic and the correlation of country-level characteristics of interest with excess mortality.

Results: In a timeline analysis, we identified notable differences in seeding events, particularly in early 2020 and when the Alpha variant emerged, likely contributing to notable differences in excess mortality between countries (lowest in Denmark during that period). These differences were more limited from July 2021 onwards. Lower excess mortality was associated with implementing stringent non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) when hospital admissions were still low in 2020 (correlation coefficient rho = 0.65, p = 0.03) and rapid rollout of vaccines in the elderly in early 2021 (rho =  - 0.76, p = 0.002). Countries which implemented NPIs while hospital admissions were low tended to experience lower gross domestic product (GDP) losses in 2020 (rho =  - 0.55, p = 0.08). Structural factors, such as high trust in the national government (rho =  - 0.77, p = 0.002) and low ratio of population at risk of poverty (rho = 0.55, p = 0.05), were also associated with lower excess mortality.

Conclusions: These results suggest the benefit of early implementation of NPIs and swift rollout of vaccines to the most vulnerable. Further analyses are required at a more granular level to better understand how these factors impacted excess mortality and help guide pandemic preparedness plans.

13个西欧国家2019冠状病毒病大流行期间死亡率过高的模式和驱动因素。
背景:据报道,在 COVID-19 大流行期间,欧洲国家之间的超额死亡率存在重大差异。了解造成这些差异的原因对于防范大流行至关重要:我们研究了 COVID-19 大流行头 30 个月期间 13 个西欧国家年龄和性别标准化累积超额死亡率的模式,以及国家层面相关特征与超额死亡率的相关性:在时间轴分析中,我们发现了播种事件的显著差异,尤其是在 2020 年初和阿尔法变体出现时,这可能是造成各国间超额死亡率显著差异的原因(丹麦在此期间的超额死亡率最低)。从 2021 年 7 月起,这些差异就比较有限了。超额死亡率较低与 2020 年入院率仍然较低时实施严格的非药物干预措施(NPIs)(相关系数 rho = 0.65,p = 0.03)以及 2021 年初在老年人中快速推广疫苗(rho = - 0.76,p = 0.002)有关。在住院率较低时实施 NPI 的国家,2020 年的国内生产总值 (GDP) 损失往往较低(rho = - 0.55,p = 0.08)。结构性因素,如对国家政府的高度信任(rho = - 0.77,p = 0.002)和较低的贫困人口比例(rho = 0.55,p = 0.05),也与较低的超额死亡率有关:这些结果表明,尽早实施国家免疫方案和迅速向最脆弱人群推广疫苗是有益的。需要进一步进行更精细的分析,以更好地了解这些因素是如何影响超额死亡率的,并帮助指导大流行病防备计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信