Assessment of residual gastric volume by ultrasound prior to upper endoscopy: a prospective cohort study.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Emanuella F A Pinto, Mariana L S Bastos, Cassiana G Prates, Guilherme B Sander, Daniela B Bumaguin, Airton Bagatini
{"title":"Assessment of residual gastric volume by ultrasound prior to upper endoscopy: a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Emanuella F A Pinto, Mariana L S Bastos, Cassiana G Prates, Guilherme B Sander, Daniela B Bumaguin, Airton Bagatini","doi":"10.1007/s12630-024-02885-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pulmonary aspiration is an adverse event with high morbidity and mortality. Despite fasting for > 8 hr, some patients still have residual gastric volume and are thus at risk of aspiration. We aimed to determine the accuracy of gastric ultrasound in assessing residual gastric content in patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a prospective cohort study, we performed gastric ultrasound immediately before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in a sample of 294 patients. We categorized the ultrasound results as high risk of aspiration when the fluid volume was > 1.5 mL·kg<sup>-1</sup> or when there was thick/solid content. We applied Spearman's test to determine the correlation between aspirated volume and ultrasound-estimated volume using three mathematical models. We assessed the method's accuracy by calculating its sensitivity and specificity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 282 patients in the analysis. The incidence of residual gastric contents was 5%. There were no aspiration events. Prokinetic use (relative risk [RR], 7.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9 to 29.1; P < 0.01), previous stroke (RR, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.2 to 13.6; P = 0.02), and male sex (RR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.2 to 9.4; P = 0.02) were significantly more frequent among those with residual gastric content. The ultrasonography's specificity and sensitivity to predict gastric content at risk of aspiration were 100% and 77%, respectively, with a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 99%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultrasonography was an effective way to assess residual gastric content, which can help improve patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":56145,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-024-02885-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Pulmonary aspiration is an adverse event with high morbidity and mortality. Despite fasting for > 8 hr, some patients still have residual gastric volume and are thus at risk of aspiration. We aimed to determine the accuracy of gastric ultrasound in assessing residual gastric content in patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Methods: In a prospective cohort study, we performed gastric ultrasound immediately before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in a sample of 294 patients. We categorized the ultrasound results as high risk of aspiration when the fluid volume was > 1.5 mL·kg-1 or when there was thick/solid content. We applied Spearman's test to determine the correlation between aspirated volume and ultrasound-estimated volume using three mathematical models. We assessed the method's accuracy by calculating its sensitivity and specificity.

Results: We included 282 patients in the analysis. The incidence of residual gastric contents was 5%. There were no aspiration events. Prokinetic use (relative risk [RR], 7.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9 to 29.1; P < 0.01), previous stroke (RR, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.2 to 13.6; P = 0.02), and male sex (RR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.2 to 9.4; P = 0.02) were significantly more frequent among those with residual gastric content. The ultrasonography's specificity and sensitivity to predict gastric content at risk of aspiration were 100% and 77%, respectively, with a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 99%.

Conclusion: Ultrasonography was an effective way to assess residual gastric content, which can help improve patient safety.

上胃镜检查前超声评估残胃容量:一项前瞻性队列研究。
目的:肺吸入是一种发病率和死亡率都很高的不良反应。尽管禁食超过 8 小时,但一些患者仍有残胃,因此有误吸的风险。我们旨在确定胃超声在评估上消化道内镜检查患者残留胃内容物方面的准确性:在一项前瞻性队列研究中,我们在对 294 例患者进行上消化道内镜检查前立即进行了胃超声检查。当胃液量大于 1.5 mL-kg-1 或有粘稠/固体内容物时,我们将超声结果归类为高吸入风险。我们采用斯皮尔曼检验法,通过三个数学模型来确定吸入量与超声波估计量之间的相关性。我们通过计算其敏感性和特异性来评估该方法的准确性:我们分析了 282 名患者。残留胃内容物的发生率为 5%。没有发生误吸事件。使用促胃液素(相对风险 [RR],7.5;95% 置信区间 [CI],1.9 至 29.1;P 结论:超声波检查是一种有效的胃肠道检查方法:超声波检查是评估残留胃内容物的有效方法,有助于提高患者的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
161
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Anesthesia (the Journal) is owned by the Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society and is published by Springer Science + Business Media, LLM (New York). From the first year of publication in 1954, the international exposure of the Journal has broadened considerably, with articles now received from over 50 countries. The Journal is published monthly, and has an impact Factor (mean journal citation frequency) of 2.127 (in 2012). Article types consist of invited editorials, reports of original investigations (clinical and basic sciences articles), case reports/case series, review articles, systematic reviews, accredited continuing professional development (CPD) modules, and Letters to the Editor. The editorial content, according to the mission statement, spans the fields of anesthesia, acute and chronic pain, perioperative medicine and critical care. In addition, the Journal publishes practice guidelines and standards articles relevant to clinicians. Articles are published either in English or in French, according to the language of submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信