Dana B Mukamel, Debra Saliba, Heather Ladd, R Tamara Konetzka
{"title":"Incorporating staffing instability in the nursing home Five-Star Staffing Composite.","authors":"Dana B Mukamel, Debra Saliba, Heather Ladd, R Tamara Konetzka","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxae159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Staffing is an important indicator of nursing home quality and resident health outcomes. The Five-Star staffing ratings in Nursing Home Care Compare, the report card published by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, is based on average hours per resident-day and turnover measures. Studies have shown that a new measure of staffing instability, capturing day-to-day staffing variation, is associated with resident outcomes and provides additional information about quality not reflected in the current Five-Star staffing ratings. In this paper we simulate the impact of including the new staffing instability measure on staffing ratings for 13 641 nursing homes nationwide, using data for the third quarter of 2023. We found that, under a conservative scenario, 21% of nursing homes perform well or poorly enough on instability that this addition would change their current staffing rating, providing consumers with additional information about quality for these facilities, with minimal disruptions to the rating system as a whole. We also demonstrate that the choice of weights for each of the measures included in the Five-Star ratings matters. These weights should reflect policy priorities. We conclude that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services can and should add staffing instability to its Five-Star staffing ratings.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"2 12","pages":"qxae159"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11646700/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Staffing is an important indicator of nursing home quality and resident health outcomes. The Five-Star staffing ratings in Nursing Home Care Compare, the report card published by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, is based on average hours per resident-day and turnover measures. Studies have shown that a new measure of staffing instability, capturing day-to-day staffing variation, is associated with resident outcomes and provides additional information about quality not reflected in the current Five-Star staffing ratings. In this paper we simulate the impact of including the new staffing instability measure on staffing ratings for 13 641 nursing homes nationwide, using data for the third quarter of 2023. We found that, under a conservative scenario, 21% of nursing homes perform well or poorly enough on instability that this addition would change their current staffing rating, providing consumers with additional information about quality for these facilities, with minimal disruptions to the rating system as a whole. We also demonstrate that the choice of weights for each of the measures included in the Five-Star ratings matters. These weights should reflect policy priorities. We conclude that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services can and should add staffing instability to its Five-Star staffing ratings.
人员配备是养老院质量和居民健康状况的重要指标。美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services)发布的报告卡《养老院护理比较》(Nursing Home Care Compare)中的五星级人员评级是基于每位住院医生每天的平均工作时间和人员流失率指标得出的。研究表明,一种新的人员配备不稳定性衡量标准,即捕捉日常人员配备变化,与住院医师的结果有关,并提供了目前五星级人员配备评级中未反映的质量的额外信息。在本文中,我们使用2023年第三季度的数据,模拟了纳入新的人员配备不稳定性措施对全国13641家养老院人员配备评级的影响。我们发现,在保守的情况下,21%的养老院在不稳定性方面表现得很好或很差,这一增加将改变他们目前的人员评级,为消费者提供有关这些设施质量的额外信息,而对整个评级系统的干扰最小。我们还证明了五星级评级中包含的每个度量的权重选择很重要。这些权重应反映政策重点。我们的结论是,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心可以而且应该在其五星级人员评级中增加人员不稳定性。