Transcriptomic Signatures of Antibody-mediated Rejection in Early Biopsies With Negative Histology in HLA-incompatible Kidney Transplantation.

IF 1.9 Q3 TRANSPLANTATION
Transplantation Direct Pub Date : 2024-12-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1097/TXD.0000000000001741
Petra Hruba, Jiri Klema, Petra Mrazova, Eva Girmanova, Katerina Jaklova, Ludek Voska, Martin Kment, Martina Mackova, Klara Osickova, Vladimir Hanzal, Philip F Halloran, Ondrej Viklicky
{"title":"Transcriptomic Signatures of Antibody-mediated Rejection in Early Biopsies With Negative Histology in HLA-incompatible Kidney Transplantation.","authors":"Petra Hruba, Jiri Klema, Petra Mrazova, Eva Girmanova, Katerina Jaklova, Ludek Voska, Martin Kment, Martina Mackova, Klara Osickova, Vladimir Hanzal, Philip F Halloran, Ondrej Viklicky","doi":"10.1097/TXD.0000000000001741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Presensitized patients with circulating donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) before transplantation are at risk for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Peritransplant desensitization mitigates but does not eliminate the alloimmune response. We examined the possibility that subthreshold AMR activity undetected by histology could be operating in some early biopsies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Transcriptome of kidney allograft biopsies performed within the first month in presensitized patients (DSA<sup>+</sup>) who had received desensitization and did not develop active/probable AMR by histology (R<sup>-</sup>) was compared with biopsies showing active/probable AMR (R<sup>+</sup>/DSA<sup>+</sup>). As negative controls, biopsies without rejection by histology in patients without DSA at transplantation were used (R<sup>-</sup>/DSA<sup>-</sup>). RNA sequencing from biopsies selected from the biobank was used in cohort 1 (n = 32) and microarray, including the molecular microscope (Molecular Microscope Diagnostic System [MMDx]) algorithm, in recent cohort 2 (n = 30).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The transcriptome of R<sup>-</sup>/DSA<sup>+</sup> was similar to R<sup>+</sup>/DSA<sup>+</sup> as these groups differed in 14 transcripts only. Contrarily, large differences were found between both DSA<sup>+</sup> groups and negative controls. Fast gene set enrichment analyses showed upregulation of the immune system in both DSA<sup>+</sup> groups (gene ontology terms: adaptive immune response, humoral immune response, antigen receptor-mediated signaling, and B-cell receptor signaling or complement activation) when compared with negative controls. MMDx assessment in cohort 2 classified 50% of R<sup>-</sup>/DSA<sup>+</sup> samples as AMR and found no differences in AMR molecular scores between R<sup>+</sup> and R<sup>-</sup> DSA<sup>+</sup> groups. In imlifidase desensitization, MMDx series showed a gradual increase in AMR scores over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Presensitized kidney transplant recipients exhibited frequent molecular calls of AMR in biopsy-based transcript diagnostics despite desensitization therapy and negative histology.</p>","PeriodicalId":23225,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Direct","volume":"11 1","pages":"e1741"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11649270/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Direct","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001741","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Presensitized patients with circulating donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) before transplantation are at risk for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Peritransplant desensitization mitigates but does not eliminate the alloimmune response. We examined the possibility that subthreshold AMR activity undetected by histology could be operating in some early biopsies.

Methods: Transcriptome of kidney allograft biopsies performed within the first month in presensitized patients (DSA+) who had received desensitization and did not develop active/probable AMR by histology (R-) was compared with biopsies showing active/probable AMR (R+/DSA+). As negative controls, biopsies without rejection by histology in patients without DSA at transplantation were used (R-/DSA-). RNA sequencing from biopsies selected from the biobank was used in cohort 1 (n = 32) and microarray, including the molecular microscope (Molecular Microscope Diagnostic System [MMDx]) algorithm, in recent cohort 2 (n = 30).

Results: The transcriptome of R-/DSA+ was similar to R+/DSA+ as these groups differed in 14 transcripts only. Contrarily, large differences were found between both DSA+ groups and negative controls. Fast gene set enrichment analyses showed upregulation of the immune system in both DSA+ groups (gene ontology terms: adaptive immune response, humoral immune response, antigen receptor-mediated signaling, and B-cell receptor signaling or complement activation) when compared with negative controls. MMDx assessment in cohort 2 classified 50% of R-/DSA+ samples as AMR and found no differences in AMR molecular scores between R+ and R- DSA+ groups. In imlifidase desensitization, MMDx series showed a gradual increase in AMR scores over time.

Conclusions: Presensitized kidney transplant recipients exhibited frequent molecular calls of AMR in biopsy-based transcript diagnostics despite desensitization therapy and negative histology.

HLA不相容肾移植中组织学阴性的早期活检中抗体介导的排斥反应的转录组特征。
背景:移植前循环存在供体特异性抗体(DSAs)的致敏患者有可能发生抗体介导的排斥反应(AMR)。移植前脱敏可减轻但不能消除同种免疫反应。我们研究了组织学未检测到的亚阈值AMR活动可能在某些早期活检中存在的可能性:我们将接受过脱敏治疗且组织学检查未发现活跃/可能的 AMR(R-)的预敏患者(DSA+)在第一个月内进行的肾脏异体活检的转录组与显示活跃/可能的 AMR(R+/DSA+)的活检进行了比较。作为阴性对照,则采用移植时无 DSA 的患者组织学无排斥反应的活检组织(R-/DSA-)。队列 1(32 人)使用了从生物库中选取的活检组织的 RNA 测序,队列 2(30 人)使用了包括分子显微镜(分子显微镜诊断系统 [MMDx])算法在内的芯片:结果:R-/DSA+与R+/DSA+的转录组相似,两组仅在14个转录本上存在差异。相反,DSA+ 组与阴性对照组之间存在巨大差异。快速基因组富集分析表明,与阴性对照组相比,两个 DSA+ 组的免疫系统都出现了上调(基因本体术语:适应性免疫反应、体液免疫反应、抗原受体介导的信号转导、B 细胞受体信号转导或补体激活)。队列 2 中的 MMDx 评估将 50% 的 R-/DSA+ 样本归类为 AMR,并发现 R+ 组和 R- DSA+ 组之间的 AMR 分子评分没有差异。在亚胺立酮酶脱敏过程中,MMDx系列显示AMR评分随着时间的推移逐渐增加:结论:尽管接受了脱敏治疗且组织学检查结果为阴性,但肾移植受者在活检转录诊断中仍会频繁出现AMR分子评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplantation Direct
Transplantation Direct TRANSPLANTATION-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
193
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信