Assessment of Hemostatic Powder in Order to Prevent Staple Line Bleeding After Sleeve Gastrectomy in High-Risk Patients: A Multicentric Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 0.8 Q4 SURGERY
Surgical technology international Pub Date : 2024-12-16
Vincenzo Salsano, Vincenzo Consalvo, Iphigenie Chaze
{"title":"Assessment of Hemostatic Powder in Order to Prevent Staple Line Bleeding After Sleeve Gastrectomy in High-Risk Patients: A Multicentric Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Vincenzo Salsano, Vincenzo Consalvo, Iphigenie Chaze","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Preventing staple line bleeding (SLB) is still a main issue in bariatric surgery procedures, especially after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Staple line reinforcements (SLR), mattress sutures, or titanium clip application did not show any statistical superiority compared to other methods. In this randomized controlled trial, we tested hemostatic powder (HP) in order to assess a possible role in the prevention of active bleeding, hematoma formation, the need for transfusions, and the increased risk for hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Centers involved started the enrollment of patients from September 2023 to August 2024. Two groups of 96 and 98 patients were created after randomization and application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients in the first group underwent LSG with application of HP, while the second group went with standard hemostasis with bipolar coagulation and titanium clip application.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no difference between the two groups. Overall bleeding was found to be similar between the two groups (p=1.00). Diffuse bleeding was superior in group 2 (p=0.02), while large hematoma formation was superior in group 1 (p=0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of HaemoCer™ (BioCer Entwicklungs, GmbH, Bayreuth, Germany) does not reduce staple line bleeding but helps reduce the incidence of hemoperitoneum as well as the reoperation rate, even though hospitalization was similar between the two groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":22194,"journal":{"name":"Surgical technology international","volume":"45 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical technology international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Preventing staple line bleeding (SLB) is still a main issue in bariatric surgery procedures, especially after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Staple line reinforcements (SLR), mattress sutures, or titanium clip application did not show any statistical superiority compared to other methods. In this randomized controlled trial, we tested hemostatic powder (HP) in order to assess a possible role in the prevention of active bleeding, hematoma formation, the need for transfusions, and the increased risk for hospitalization.

Materials and methods: Centers involved started the enrollment of patients from September 2023 to August 2024. Two groups of 96 and 98 patients were created after randomization and application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients in the first group underwent LSG with application of HP, while the second group went with standard hemostasis with bipolar coagulation and titanium clip application.

Results: There was no difference between the two groups. Overall bleeding was found to be similar between the two groups (p=1.00). Diffuse bleeding was superior in group 2 (p=0.02), while large hematoma formation was superior in group 1 (p=0.02).

Conclusion: The use of HaemoCer™ (BioCer Entwicklungs, GmbH, Bayreuth, Germany) does not reduce staple line bleeding but helps reduce the incidence of hemoperitoneum as well as the reoperation rate, even though hospitalization was similar between the two groups.

一项多中心随机对照试验评估止血粉对预防高危患者袖式胃切除术后钉线出血的作用。
导论:预防钉线出血(SLB)仍然是减肥手术过程中的一个主要问题,特别是在腹腔镜袖胃切除术(LSG)后。与其他方法相比,订书钉线增强(SLR),床垫缝合或钛夹应用没有显示出任何统计学优势。在这项随机对照试验中,我们测试了止血粉(HP),以评估其在预防活动性出血、血肿形成、输血需求和住院风险增加方面的可能作用。材料与方法:研究中心于2023年9月至2024年8月开始入组患者。在随机化并应用纳入和排除标准后,分别建立96例和98例患者两组。第一组患者行LSG加HP,第二组患者行双极凝固加钛夹标准止血。结果:两组间无明显差异。两组总出血情况相似(p=1.00)。2组以弥漫性出血为主(p=0.02), 1组以大血肿为主(p=0.02)。结论:使用HaemoCer™(BioCer entwicklung, GmbH, Bayreuth, Germany)不能减少钉线出血,但有助于降低腹膜出血发生率和再手术率,尽管两组住院时间相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
141
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信