Improving How Caregivers of People Living With Dementia Are Identified in the Electronic Health Record: Qualitative Study and Exploratory Chart Review.

IF 5 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
JMIR Aging Pub Date : 2024-12-13 DOI:10.2196/59584
Ariel R Green, Cynthia M Boyd, Rosalphie Quiles Rosado, Andrea E Daddato, Kathy S Gleason, Tobie E Taylor McPhail, Marcela D Blinka, Nancy L Schoenborn, Jennifer L Wolff, Elizabeth A Bayliss, Rebecca S Boxer
{"title":"Improving How Caregivers of People Living With Dementia Are Identified in the Electronic Health Record: Qualitative Study and Exploratory Chart Review.","authors":"Ariel R Green, Cynthia M Boyd, Rosalphie Quiles Rosado, Andrea E Daddato, Kathy S Gleason, Tobie E Taylor McPhail, Marcela D Blinka, Nancy L Schoenborn, Jennifer L Wolff, Elizabeth A Bayliss, Rebecca S Boxer","doi":"10.2196/59584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Family and unpaid caregivers play a crucial role in supporting people living with dementia; yet, they are not systematically identified and documented by health systems.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aims of the study are to determine the extent to which caregivers are currently identified and documented in the electronic health record (EHR) and to elicit the perspectives of caregivers and clinical staff on how to best identify, engage, and support caregivers of people living with dementia through the EHR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>People with dementia were identified based on International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes or dementia medications in the EHR. A chart review of people with dementia characterized how caregiver information was documented and whether caregivers had shared access to the patient portal. Caregivers of eligible people with dementia were then recruited through mailed letters and follow-up calls to the homes of people with dementia. We conducted semistructured interviews with caregivers, clinicians, and staff involved in the care of people with dementia within 2 health systems in Maryland and Colorado. Transcripts were analyzed using a mixed inductive and deductive approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Caregivers of people with dementia (N=22) were usually identified in the \"contact information\" or \"patient contacts\" tab (n=20, 91%) by their name and relation to the people with dementia; this tab did not specify the caregiver's role. Caregivers were also mentioned, and their roles were described to a varying degree in clinical notes (n=21, 96%). Of the 22 caregivers interviewed, the majority (n=17, 77%) reported that the people with dementia had additional caregivers. The presence of multiple caregivers could be gleaned from most charts (n=16, 73%); however, this information was not captured systematically, and caregivers' individual contributions were not explicitly recorded. Interviews with 22 caregivers and 16 clinical staff revealed two major themes: (1) caregiving arrangements are complex and not systematically captured or easy to locate in the EHR and (2) health systems should develop standardized processes to obtain and document caregiver information in the EHR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This exploratory chart review and qualitative interview study found that people with dementia frequently have multiple caregivers, whose roles and needs are captured inconsistently in the EHR. To address this concern, caregivers and clinical staff suggested that health systems should develop and test workflows to identify caregivers, assess their needs at multiple touchpoints, and record their information in extractable EHR fields.</p>","PeriodicalId":36245,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Aging","volume":"7 ","pages":"e59584"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11660723/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/59584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Family and unpaid caregivers play a crucial role in supporting people living with dementia; yet, they are not systematically identified and documented by health systems.

Objective: The aims of the study are to determine the extent to which caregivers are currently identified and documented in the electronic health record (EHR) and to elicit the perspectives of caregivers and clinical staff on how to best identify, engage, and support caregivers of people living with dementia through the EHR.

Methods: People with dementia were identified based on International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes or dementia medications in the EHR. A chart review of people with dementia characterized how caregiver information was documented and whether caregivers had shared access to the patient portal. Caregivers of eligible people with dementia were then recruited through mailed letters and follow-up calls to the homes of people with dementia. We conducted semistructured interviews with caregivers, clinicians, and staff involved in the care of people with dementia within 2 health systems in Maryland and Colorado. Transcripts were analyzed using a mixed inductive and deductive approach.

Results: Caregivers of people with dementia (N=22) were usually identified in the "contact information" or "patient contacts" tab (n=20, 91%) by their name and relation to the people with dementia; this tab did not specify the caregiver's role. Caregivers were also mentioned, and their roles were described to a varying degree in clinical notes (n=21, 96%). Of the 22 caregivers interviewed, the majority (n=17, 77%) reported that the people with dementia had additional caregivers. The presence of multiple caregivers could be gleaned from most charts (n=16, 73%); however, this information was not captured systematically, and caregivers' individual contributions were not explicitly recorded. Interviews with 22 caregivers and 16 clinical staff revealed two major themes: (1) caregiving arrangements are complex and not systematically captured or easy to locate in the EHR and (2) health systems should develop standardized processes to obtain and document caregiver information in the EHR.

Conclusions: This exploratory chart review and qualitative interview study found that people with dementia frequently have multiple caregivers, whose roles and needs are captured inconsistently in the EHR. To address this concern, caregivers and clinical staff suggested that health systems should develop and test workflows to identify caregivers, assess their needs at multiple touchpoints, and record their information in extractable EHR fields.

改进如何在电子健康记录中识别痴呆症患者的照顾者:定性研究和探索性图表回顾。
背景:家庭和无偿照顾者在支持痴呆症患者方面发挥着至关重要的作用;然而,卫生系统没有系统地识别和记录这些疾病。目的:本研究的目的是确定护理人员目前在电子健康记录(EHR)中被识别和记录的程度,并引出护理人员和临床工作人员关于如何通过电子健康记录最好地识别、参与和支持痴呆症患者护理人员的观点。方法:根据国际疾病分类第十版(ICD-10)代码或EHR中的痴呆药物对痴呆患者进行识别。对痴呆症患者的图表回顾描述了如何记录护理人员信息以及护理人员是否共享患者门户网站。然后通过邮寄信件和后续电话到痴呆症患者家中招募符合条件的痴呆症患者的护理人员。我们对马里兰州和科罗拉多州两个卫生系统中参与痴呆症患者护理的护理人员、临床医生和工作人员进行了半结构化访谈。转录本分析使用混合归纳和演绎的方法。结果:痴呆患者照护者(N=22)在“联系方式”或“患者联系方式”选项卡(N= 20, 91%)通过姓名和与痴呆患者的关系进行识别;此选项卡没有指定护理人员的角色。护理人员也被提及,他们的角色在临床记录中有不同程度的描述(n= 21,96%)。在接受采访的22名护理人员中,大多数(n= 17,77%)报告说痴呆症患者有额外的护理人员。从大多数图表中可以收集到多个照顾者的存在(n= 16,73%);然而,这些信息并没有被系统地捕获,护理人员的个人贡献也没有被明确地记录下来。对22名护理人员和16名临床工作人员的访谈揭示了两个主要主题:(1)护理安排复杂,无法系统地捕获或易于在电子病历中定位;(2)卫生系统应制定标准化流程,以在电子病历中获取和记录护理人员信息。结论:这一探索性图表回顾和定性访谈研究发现,痴呆症患者经常有多个照顾者,他们的角色和需求在电子病历中被不一致地记录下来。为了解决这一问题,护理人员和临床工作人员建议卫生系统应开发和测试工作流程,以确定护理人员,在多个接触点评估他们的需求,并在可提取的电子病历字段中记录他们的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Aging
JMIR Aging Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信